Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates

Abstract

THE dating of the history of reversals of the Earth's magnetic field since the Jurassic period has been based primarily on radiometric dating of a small number of reversals, with most ages of individual reversals interpolated or extrapolated on the basis of the widths of marine magnetic anomalies. Recently, however, Pliocene and Pleistocene reversals have been dated by an entirely independent method, which relies on correlating climate proxies (such as oxygen isotope ratios) in sediments with calculated variations of the Earth's orbit and inclination1–4. The dates obtained from this astronomical calibration are 3–8% older than radiometrically calibrated ages published between 1979 and 1989 (see, for example, refs 5 and 6), although recent dating by the 40Ar/39Ar method tends to confirm the astronomical calibration7–10, at least for the past 3.3 Myr. Here I use sea-floor spreading rates determined from high-precision plate-rotation solutions for five plate pairs to test the astronomically calibrated timescale over the past 5.32 Myr. The results suggest that the errors in the astronomical calibration are no greater than 0.02 Myr, and also show that spreading rate can remain constant for several million years, even for fast-moving plates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, R. G. Quat. Res. 17, 135–147 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shackleton, N. J., Berger, A. & Peltier, W. R. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 81, 251–261 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilgen, F. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 104, 226–244 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilgen, F. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 107, 349–368 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mankinen, E. A. & Dalrymple, G. B. J. geophys. Res. 84, 615–626 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harland, W. B. et al. A Geologic Time Scale 1989 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baksi, A. K., Hsu, V., McWilliams, M. O. & Farrar, E. Science 256, 356–357 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spell, T. L. & McDougall, I. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1181–1184 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tauxe, L., Deino, A. D., Behrensmeyer, A. K. & Potts, R. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 109, 561–572 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. McDougall, I., Brown, F. H., Cerling, T. E. & Hillhouse, J. W. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2349–2352 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, D. S. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  12. Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13917–13951 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, T. J. Am. statist Ass. 83, 1178–1183 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klitgord, K. D., Huestis, S. P., Mudie, J. D. & Parker, R. L. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 387–424 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Geophys. J. Int. 101, 425–478 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsyth, D. & Uyeda, S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 163–200 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D. Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates. Nature 364, 788–790 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/364788a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/364788a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing