Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Primary production in the glacial North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans

Abstract

THE conditions controlling primary production are very different in the modern North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans1, a difference that is reflected in the composition of diatom fossils in surface sediments. By contrast, I report here evidence that during the last glacial interval the diatom assemblage, and by extrapolation the primary production, was very similar in the two regions. The modern analogues of these assemblages occur in sediments of Baffin Bay and the Sea of Okhotsk, both highly productive seas where ice is present. I infer that during the last glacial interval plankton biomass was at least as high as it is today in the North Atlantic, and was as much as an order of magnitude higher in the North Pacific. The glacial assemblage occurs in lithologies dominated by ice-rafted detritus, which is generally believed to indicate the presence of icebergs2–6. I hypothesize that the presence of numerous icebergs, possibly associated with sea ice, supported high production by physical mechanisms (such as turbulent mixing and enhanced density stratification) and/or biogeochemical ones (such as supply of major or trace nutrients).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parsons, T. R. & Lalli, C. M. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. A. Rev. 26, 317–359 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bramlette, M. N. & Bradley, W. H. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 196, 1–34 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kent, D., Opdyke, N. D. & Ewing, M. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 82, 2741–2754 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broecker, W., Bond, G., Klas, M., Clark, E. & McManus, J. clim. Dynam. 6, 265–273 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, G. et al. Nature 360, 245–249 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruddiman, W. F. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 88, 1813–1827 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, J. H., Gordon, R. M., Fitzwater, S. & Broenkow, W. W. Deep-Sea Res. 36, 649–680 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morel, F. M. M., Rueter, J. G. & Price, N. M. Oceanography 4, 56–61 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, C. B. et al. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1600–1615 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman, G. et al. Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 70, 634–641 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sancetta, C. & Silvestri, S. Paleoceanography 1, 163–180 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, G. C., Lam, R. K., Booth, B. C. & Glass, J. M. NOAA Spec. Rep. 76, 477–798 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maynard, N. G. thesis, Univ. of Miami (1974).

  14. Keigwin, L. D., Jones, G. A. & Froelich, P. N. Earth planet Sci. Lett. (in the press).

  15. Zahn, R., Pedersen, T. F., Bornhold, B. D. & Mix, A. C. Paleoceanography 6, 543–560 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, K. M. Mar. Micropaleont. 10, 327–341 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Subba Rao, D. V. & Platt, T. Polar Biol. 3, 191–201 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larssen, B. B., Elverhoi, A. & Aagaard, P. Polar Res. 5, 313–315 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wollenburg, I., Pfirman, S. & Lange, M. Eos 69, 1263 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barnes, P. W., Kempena, E. M. & Reimnitz E. Eos 69, 1263 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Horner, R. in Sea Ice Biota (ed Horner, R.) 148–157 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hart, T. J. Discovery Rep. 21, 261–356 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neshyba, S. Nature 267, 507–508 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs, S. S., Huppert, H. E., Holdsworth, G. & Drewry, D. J. J. geophys. Res. 86, 6547–6555 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Josberger, E. G. in Iceberg Utilization (ed. Husseiny, A. A.) 245–264 (Pergamon, New York 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Allison, I., Knowles, K. & Wright, S. Iceberg Res. 9, 3–9 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shulenberger, E. Polar Biol. 2, 149–158 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobs, S. S., Gordon, A. L. & Amos, A. F. Nature 277, 469–471 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Appollonio S. Science 180, 491–493 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gran, H. H. Int. Conseil Explor. Mer. Jour. 8, 343–358 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, J. H., Gordon, R. M. & Fitzwalter, S. E. Nature 345, 156–158 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Morleyh, J. J. Quat. Res. 20, 374–386 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morley, J. J., Hays, J. D. & Robertson, J. H. Deep-Sea Res. 29, 1485–1499 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Korotkevich, T. S. & Lorius, C. Nature 329, 408–414 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sancetta, C. Primary production in the glacial North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans. Nature 360, 249–251 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360249a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/360249a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing