Abstract
THE initial derivation of atomic-scale models of the 4-connected framework crystal structures of zeolites and related materials is generally difficult. Interpretation of powder X-ray diffraction data to yield a unit cell and some symmetry information is often straightforward. Chemical analyses and sorption experiments indicate the number of framework tetrahedra, nT, present in the unit cell (T represents the framework tetrahedral species, such as Si or Al) and the approximate pore dimensions. However, because synthetic zeolites are almost invariably microcrystalline, the possibilities for structure solution by conventional diffraction methods are limited, and framework structure determinations have traditionally relied heavily on the building of physical models. We describe here an alternative approach, in which approximate T-atom coordinates are derived from the unit-cell size and symmetry, and the value of nT from computer modelling. An initially arbitrary T-atom configuration is optimized with respect to a 'cost function' based on the T–T distances, T–T–T angles and number of first-neighbour T-atoms, by simulated annealing using Monte Carlo methods. The potential of the method for structural determinations in both two dimensions (for structural projections) and three dimensions are illustrated by results obtained for a hexagonal cell of space group P6/mmm and dimensions a = 18.4 Å and c = 7.5 Å, and by determination of the previously unknown structure of lithium gallosilicate.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meier, W. M. & Olson, D. H. Atlas of Zeolite Structure Types (Butterworths, Surrey, 1987).
LaPierre, R. B. et al. Zeolites 5, 346–348 (1985).
Bennett, J. M., Richardson, J. W., Pluth, J. J. & Smith, J. V. Zeolites 7, 160–162 (1987).
Treacy, M. M. J. & Newsam, J. M. Nature 332, 249–251 (1988).
Newsam, J. M., Treacy, M. M. J., Koetsier, W. T. & deGruyter, C. B. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A420, 375–405 (1988).
Meier, W. M. & Villiger, H. Z. Kristallogr. 129, 411–423 (1969).
Baerlocher, Ch., Hepp, A. & Meier, W. M. DLS-76 Manual (ETH, Zurich, 1977).
K. Binder (ed.) Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics 2nd edn (Springer, Berlin, 1987).
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. & Vecchi, M. P. Science 220, 671–680 (1983).
Smith, J. V. in Zeolites: Facts, Figures, Future (eds van Santen, R. A. & Jacobs, P. A.) 29–47 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989).
Smith, J. V. & Dytrych, W. J. Z. Kristallogr. 175, 31–36 (1986).
Smith, J. V. & Dytrych, W. J. Nature 309, 607–608 (1984).
Richardson, J. W., Smith, J. V. & Pluth, J. J. J. phys. Chem. (in the press).
Davis, M. E., Saldarriaga, C., Montes, C., Garces, J. & Crowder, C. Nature 331, 698–699 (1988).
Smith, J. V. & Bennett, J. M. Am. Miner. 66, 777–788 (1981).
Barrer, R. M. & Villiger, H. J. chem. Soc. chem. Commun., 659–660 (1969).
Barri, S. A. I., Smith, G. W., White, D. & Young, D. Nature 312, 533–534 (1984).
Newsam, J. M. J. phys. Chem. 92, 445–452 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deem, M., Newsam, J. Determination of 4-connected framework crystal structures by simulated annealing. Nature 342, 260–262 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/342260a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/342260a0
This article is cited by
-
Computational development of the nanoporous materials genome
Nature Reviews Materials (2017)
-
In silico prediction and screening of modular crystal structures via a high-throughput genomic approach
Nature Communications (2015)
-
Crystal structure prediction from first principles
Nature Materials (2008)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.