Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities

Abstract

Part of the current dogma in ecology is that competition between species for limited resources is not only common but also a major organizing force in many communities1,2 largely because studies on vertebrates, particularly birds, have played a major role in creating the traditional framework of niche theory and resource partitioning3–9. Other workers, particularly those studying insect communities, have suggested that significant interspecific competition is too rare and sporadic to be of major significance and have placed more emphasis on autecological processes10–13. Efforts to resolve the controversy have concentrated on the question of whether or not competition is common in nature1. Here we show that even where competition can be demonstrated, it need not have a major role in community organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schoener, T. W. Am. Nat. 122, 240–285 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roughgarden, J. Am. Nat. 122, 583–601 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cody, M. L. Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities (Princeton University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond, J. M. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 342–444 (Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond, J. M. Am. Scient. 66, 322–331 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lack, D., Ecological Isolation in Birds (Harvard Univeristy Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacArthur, R. H. in Avian Biology Vol. 1 (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pianka, E. E. . in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 292–314 (Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roughgarden, J., Heckel, D. & Fuentes, E. . in Lizard Ecology (eds Huey, R. B., Pianka, E. R. & Schoener, T. W.) 371–410 (Harvard University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andrewartha, H. G. & Birch, L. C., The Distribution and Abundance of Animals (Chicago University Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lawton, J. H. & Strong, D. R. Am. Nat. 118, 317–338 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strong, D. R., 122, 636–660 (1983).

  13. Connell, J. H. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 460–490 (Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shorrocks, B. in Genetics and Biology of Drosophila Vol. 3b (eds Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L. & Thompson, J. N. Jr) 385–428 (Academic, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atkinson, W. D. & Shorrocks, B. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 461–471 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassell, M. P. & Comins, H. N. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 202–221 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. May, R. M. & Ives, A. R. . J. theor. Biol. (in the press).

  18. Nicholson, A. J. Aust. J. Zool. 2, 9–65 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ayala, F. J. Nature 224, 1076–1079 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayala, F. J. in Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky (eds Hecht, M. K. & Steere, W. C.) 121–158 (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayala, F. J. Am. Scient. 60, 348–357 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ayala, F. J., Gilpin, M. E. & Ehrenfeld, J. G. Theor. Pop. Biol. 4, 331–356 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DeBenedictis, P. A. Ecology 58, 158–166 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, R. S. Ecology 45, 132–148 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atkinson, W. D. & Shorrocks, B. Am. Nat. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shorrocks, B., Rosewell, J., Edwards, K. et al. Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities. Nature 310, 310–312 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/310310a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/310310a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing