Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Epistatic gene interactions in the control of division in fission yeast

Abstract

THERE is currently much interest in the mechanism which controls the timing of cell division. Certain features of the control have been found to be common to a variety of eukaryotes. In particular, the importance of cell size as a parameter affecting cell cycle progress has been reported for mammalian cells1,2 and for several single-celled eukaryotes3–6. Another feature common to several systems is that growth conditions have a direct effect on the timing of division cycle events7–9, and on cell size9,10. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, both cell size6 and nutritional conditions9 have been shown to affect cycle kinetics. The organism has been used extensively as a model eukaryotic system, largely because of the ease of measuring cell size and because division occurs by binary fission11. More recently, its genetic tractability has led to the isolation of cell division cycle (cdc) mutants12, and also of wee mutants altered in the control coordinating growth with the division cycle13–15. The existence of such control mutants allows a more direct approach to the investigation of the molecular basis of division control, in contrast to the indirect methods used in other systems4,16–18. wee mutants are so far unique to S. pombe. The most conspicuous property of wee mutants is their reduced cell size13,14. Analysis of these mutants15,19 and other evidence9 has shown that control over cell division timing normally acts at entry to mitosis. As the function of a number of cdc genes is specifically required for mitosis12, interactions between wee and cdc mutants which affect mitosis might be expected. I report here that the mitotic defect caused by a defective cdc25 allele is suppressed in wee mutants. Suppression by wee1 mutants is almost complete, while the wee2.1 mutation is a less effective suppressor. The significance of these findings for genetic models of the control of mitosis is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Killander, D. & Zetterberg, A. Expl Cell Res. 40, 12–20 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shields, R., Brooks, R. F., Riddle, P. N., Capellaro, D. F. & Delia, D. Cell 15, 469–474 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Prescott, D. M. Expl Cell Res. 11, 94–98 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sudbery, P. E. & Grant, W. D. J. Cell Sci. 22, 59–65 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston, G. C., Pringle, J. R. & Hartwell, L. H. Expl Cell Res. 105, 79–98 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fantes, P. A. J. Cell Sci. 24, 51–67 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pardee, A. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 1286–1290 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartwell, L. H. & Unger, M. W. J. Cell Biol. 75, 422–435 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fantes, P. & Nurse, P. Expl Cell. Res. 107, 377–386 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnston, G. C., Ehrhardt, C. W., Lorincz, A. & Carter, B. L. A. J. Bact. 137, 1–5 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchinson, J. M. in Methods in Cell Physiology Vol. 4 (ed. Prescott, D. M.) 131–165 (Academic, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nurse, P., Thuriaux, P. & Nasmyth, K. Molec. gen. Genet. 146, 167–178 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nurse, P. Nature 256, 547–551 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thuriaux, P., Nurse, P. & Carter, B. Molec. gen. Genet. 161, 215–220 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nurse, P. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 5, 1191–1193 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeuthen, E. & Rasmussen, L. in Research in Protozoology Vol. 4 (ed. Chen, T. T.) 11–145 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachsenmaier, W., Remy, U. & Plattner-Schobel, R. Expl Cell. Res. 73, 41–48 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wille, J. J., Scheffey, C. & Kauffman, S. A. J. Cell Sci. 27, 91–104 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fantes, P. A. & Nurse, P. Expl Cell. Res. 115, 317–329 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasmyth, K. thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (1977).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FANTES, P. Epistatic gene interactions in the control of division in fission yeast. Nature 279, 428–430 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279428a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279428a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing