Abstract
Three-dimensional visual scenes project onto the retina of the eye as two-dimensional images. The third dimension, depth, is projected as subtle differences between left and right retinal images. As early as the 1830s, stereoscopic depth perception was shown to depend on horizontal disparities between these images1. To detect disparity, the visual system must match corresponding parts of the two retinal images. To identify the stimulus elements used in stereo matching, I applied a disparity-adaptation technique to visual patterns whose one-dimensional components and two-dimensional features have very different disparities. Surprisingly, the adaptors that are effective in altering depth perception appear widely separated in depth from the patterns they adapt. I conclude that stereo matching occurs in all directions of two-dimensional space and that one-dimensional components are the stimulus primitives, the fundamental elements of stereo matching. This is a reversal of the classical viewof stereo correspondence as a one-dimensional (horizontal) matching of monocular two-dimensional features2,3,4.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wheatstone, C. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2, 371–393 (1838).
Ogle, K. N. Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, (1950)).
Bishop, P. O. Neurosciences Research Study Program Boulder Symposium (ed. Schmitt, F. O.) (Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York, (1970)).
Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Univ. of Chicago Press, (1971)).
Wallach, H. On Perception (ed. Wallach, H.) (Quadrangle, New York, (1976)).
Farell, B. & Ahuja, S. Binocular disparity of 1- and 2-D contours Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (suppl.) 37, 284 (1996).
Farell, B. Depth coherence and depth reversal in stereo plaids Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (suppl.) 38, 904 (1997).
Ramachandran, V. S. & Cavanagh, P. Subjective contours capture stereopsis. Nature 317, 527–531 (1985).
Schumer, R. A. & Ganz, L. Disparity averaging in random dot stereopsis J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1479 (1979).
Stevenson, S. B. & Schor, C. M. Human stereo matching is not restricted to epipolar lines Vision Res. 37, 2717–2723 (1997).
Morgan, M. J. & Castet, E. The aperture problem in stereopsis Vision Res. 39, 2737–2744 (1997).
Adelson, E. H. & Movshon, J. A. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 300, 523–525 (1982).
DeAngelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R. D. Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 352, 156–159 (1991).
Blakemore, C. & Hague, B. Evidence for disparity detecting neurons in the human visual system J.Physiol. (Lond.) 225, 437–455 (1972).
Hibbard, P. B. & Langley, K. Plaid slant and inclination thresholds can be predicted from components Vision Res. 38, 1073–1084 (1998).
von Helmholtz, H. Treatise on Physiological OpticsVol. 3 (ed. Southall, J. P. C.) (translated from German 3rd edn) (Optical Society of America, (1925)).
Gillam, B., Chambers, D. & Lawergren, B. The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: an empirical and theoretical study Percept. Psychophys. 44, 473–483 (1988).
Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 361, 253–255 (1993).
Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962).
Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C. & Pettigrew, J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination J. Physiol. (Lond.) 193, 327–342 (1967).
Poggio, G. F. & Fischer, B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey J. Neurophysiol. 40, 1392–1405 (1977).
Zeki, S. Functional specialization and binocular interaction in the visual areas of rhesus monkey prestriate cortex Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 204, 379–397 (1979).
Ferster, D. Acomparison of binocular depth mechanisms in area 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex J.Physiol. (Lond.) 311, 623–655 (1981).
LeVay, S. & Voigt, T. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex Vis. Neurosci. 1, 395–414 (1988).
Nikara, T., Bishop, P. O. & Pettigrew, J. D. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex Exp. Brain Res. 5, 353–372 (1968).
Anzai, A., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R. D. Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: Position vs. phase Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5438–5443 (1997).
Mayhew, J. E. W. & Frisby, J. P. Stereopsis masking in humans is not orientationally tuned Perception 7, 431–436 (1978).
Acknowledgements
I thank D. C. Moore for laboratory assistance, and S. Ahuja, R. van Ee, J. Krauskopf, D. Matza, D. G. Pelli and S. B. Stevenson for comments and discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farell, B. Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in human stereopsis. Nature 395, 689–693 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/27192
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/27192
This article is cited by
-
The motor side of depth vision
Nature (2001)
-
Putting plaids in perspective
Nature (1999)
-
reply: Putting plaids in perspective
Nature (1999)
-
Stereoscopic occlusion junctions
Nature Neuroscience (1999)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.