Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New Technique for the Study of Sperm Whale Migration

Abstract

IN the southern hemisphere, female and young male sperm whales (up to about 39 feet long) are not normally found in higher latitudes than 40° S while large males occur in Antarctic waters1–3; clearly many large bulls must migrate from the breeding areas into colder regions. Evidence of the return of large bulls to lower latitudes rests upon marking them in the Antarctic4 or external infestation by Antarctic Cocconeis or Cyamus5. Only a single mark5 has been recovered which provides direct evidence for the return north from Antarctic waters. This mark (USSR No. 650203) was fired on December 25, 1967, at 62° 22′ S 26° 25′ E and the whale was killed on May 13, 1968, off Durban. The small size of the male concerned (35 feet at death) makes this record rather surprising although Jonsgård6 did mention that the smallest whales from Antarctic waters were about 35 feet. Marking can provide information on only a small part of the whale population at considerable cost, freshness of the whale restricts the value of infestation as an indicator but the study of food remnants in sperm whale stomachs provides another method without these disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Townsend, C. H., Zoologica, New York, 19, 1 (1935).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews, L. H., The Sperm Whale, Physeter catodon. Discovery Rep., 17, 93 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Slijper, E. J., Utrecht, W. L. Van, and Naaktgeboren, C., Bijdr. Dierk., Afl., 34, 1 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, S. G., Rep. Intern. Commun. Whal., 21, 51 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Best, P. B., Investl. Rep. Div. Sea Fish. S. Afr., 78, 1 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonsgård, A., Norsk Hvalfangsttid, 49, 289 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, M. R., Norsk Hvalfangsttid, 51, 173 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, M. R., Discovery Rep. (in the press).

  9. Clarke, M. R., Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist., 8, 419 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deacon, G. E. R., Discovery Rep., 15, 1 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mackintosh, N. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 152, 624 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gambell, R., Norsk Hvalfangsttid, 57, 126 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Best, P. B., Invest. Rep. Div. Sea Fish S. Afr., 66, 1 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CLARKE, M. New Technique for the Study of Sperm Whale Migration. Nature 238, 405–406 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/238405a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/238405a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing