Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Taste Polymorphism in Mice involving a Bitter Sugar Derivative

Abstract

BECAUSE of the high correspondence between bitterness and the toxicity of naturally occurring bitter products1, it is important for many free-ranging animals to be able to recognize and reject bitter tasting stimuli. The wild rat and mouse have also been subjected to synthetic rodenticides, many of which are bitter tasting2. Selection pressures would therefore be expected to be directed toward maintaining sensitivity to bitter stimuli. By the same reasoning, sensitivity to bitter stimuli might well have been lost in some of the highly inbred strains of laboratory mice. Evidence of individual differences in responsiveness in non-homogeneous strains is suggestive of this trend3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter, C. P., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 43, 358 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moncrieff, R. W., The Chemical Senses (Leonard Hill Bks., London, 3rd ed., 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warren, R. P., Science, 140, 808 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, G., Ferguson, J., and Dodds, M., Indust. Eng. Chem., 25, 967 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, M., Bull. Nat. Formul. Comm., 10, 131 (1942).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krizenecky, J., Z. Untersuch. Lebensm., 81, 21 (1941).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linegar, C., Bull. Nat. Formul. Comm., 11, 59 (1943).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Warren, R. P., and Pfaffmann, C., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 52, 263 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren, R. P., and Vince, M. A., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 56, 910 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brindley, L. D., Animal Behaviour, 13, 507 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann, G., Ann. Eugen., 9, 123 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs, B. B., J. Hered., 53, 183 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goedde, H. W., and Ohligmacher, H., Humangenetik, 1, 423 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dawson, W., West, G. B., and Kalmus, H., Ann. Hum. Genet., 30, 273 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ford, E. B., Genetic Polymorphism (Faber and Faber, London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WARREN, R., LEWIS, R. Taste Polymorphism in Mice involving a Bitter Sugar Derivative. Nature 227, 77–78 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/227077a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227077a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing