Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New Types of Kinins and their Action on Fruit Tree Species

Abstract

WE have been engaged in work on the effects of some kinetin analogues on various tree species and have found that they have somewhat different biological activity1,2. Because of the comparatively low solubility of 6-furfurylamino- and 6-benzylaminopurine in water, which complicates the application of these compounds, our interest was directed primarily to the preparation of kinetin derivatives with higher solubility in water. The solubility of kinins can considerably influence their transport and therefore also their practical application. After application of 6-benzylaminopurine-8-14C into the petioles of leaves of one-year-old apple shoots, the applied kinin was found by autoradiography about 10 cm in the basipetal direction from the point of application whereas kinin transport in the apical direction was negligible1,2. The most soluble compounds of this type synthesized by us up to now are N-(6-purinyl)-β-phenylalanine and N-(6-purinyl)-α-phenylglycine and the 6-benzylamino-9-glucosylpurine already described3,4. The first of these had no biological activity. 6-Benzylamino-9-glucosylpurine was about as active as 6-benzylaminopurine, whereas the biological activity of N-(6-purinyl)-α-phenylglycine depended on the type of application. The activity of N-(6-purinyl-α-phenylglycine applied to the bark and bast is more active in stimulating the buds of apple trees from the winter vegetative rest than is 6-benzylaminopurine itself, or 6-benzylaminoglucosylpurine5. Fig. 1, where N-(6-purinyl)-α-phenylglycine was applied to every second bud, shows that leaves of considerable size shot from the stimulated buds within 20 days, whereas no change was observed in the unstimulated control buds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chvojka, L., Vereš, K., and Kozel, J., Biol. Plant., Praha, 3, 140 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chvojka, L., and Vereš, K., Proc. V. Intern. Biochem. Congr., Moscow (1961).

  3. Brown, G. B., and Weliky, V. S., J. Biol. Chem., 204, 1019 (1953).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, G. M., and Johnson, A. W., J. Chem. Soc., 4347 (1960).

  5. Chvojka, L., Kračmar, P., Beneš, J., and Belea, A., Biológia, 8, 579 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BENEŠ, J., VEREŠ, K., CHVOJKA, L. et al. New Types of Kinins and their Action on Fruit Tree Species. Nature 206, 830–831 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/206830b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/206830b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing