Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The same frequency of planets inside and outside open clusters of stars

Nature volume 499, pages 55–58 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Most stars and their planets form in open clusters. Over 95 per cent of such clusters have stellar densities too low (less than a hundred stars per cubic parsec) to withstand internal and external dynamical stresses and fall apart within a few hundred million years1. Older open clusters have survived by virtue of being richer and denser in stars (1,000 to 10,000 per cubic parsec) when they formed. Such clusters represent a stellar environment very different from the birthplace of the Sun and other planet-hosting field stars. So far more than 800 planets have been found around Sun-like stars in the field2. The field planets are usually the size of Neptune or smaller3,4,5. In contrast, only four planets have been found orbiting stars in open clusters6,7,8, all with masses similar to or greater than that of Jupiter. Here we report observations of the transits of two Sun-like stars by planets smaller than Neptune in the billion-year-old open cluster NGC6811. This demonstrates that small planets can form and survive in a dense cluster environment, and implies that the frequency and properties of planets in open clusters are consistent with those of planets around field stars in the Galaxy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The colour–magnitude and colour–period diagrams for NGC6811.
Figure 2: Transit light curves.
Figure 3: Distribution of planetary properties.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lada, C. J. & Lada, E. A. Embedded clusters in molecular clouds. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 41, 57–115 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. http://exoplanet.eu (2012)

  3. Mayor, M. et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets XXXIV. Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets. Astron. Astrophys. (submitted); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2497

  4. Howard, A. et al. Planet occurrence within 0.25 AU of solar-type stars from Kepler. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 201, 15–35 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fressin, F. et al. The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets. Astrophys. J. 766, 81–99 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato, B. et al. A planetary companion to the Hyades giant Epsilon Tauri. Astrophys. J. 661, 527–531 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lovis, C. & Mayor, M. Planets around evolved intermediate-mass stars. I. Two substellar companions in the open clusters NGC2423 and NGC4349. Astron. Astrophys. 472, 657–664 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quinn, S. et al. Two “b”s in the beehive: the discovery of the first hot Jupiters in an open cluster. Astrophys. J. 756, L33–L36 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Saders, J. L. & Gaudi, B. S. Ensemble analysis of open cluster transit surveys: upper limits on the frequency of short-period planets consistent with the field. Astrophys. J. 729, 63–76 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pace, G., Pasquini, L. & Francois, P. Abundances of four open clusters from solar stars. Astron. Astrophys. 489, 403–412 (2008)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. The planet-metallicity correlation. Astrophys. J. 622, 1102–1117 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meibom, S. The Kepler Cluster Study. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 43, (AAS Meeting 218) abstr. 311.03. (2011)

  13. Yi, S. et al. Toward better age estimates for stellar populations: the Y2 isochrones for solar mixture. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 136, 417–437 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G. & Chiosi, C. Evolutionary tracks and isochrones for low- and intermediate-mass stars: from 0.15 to 7 MO, and from Z = 0.0004 to 0.03. Astron. Astrophys. 141 (Suppl.). 371–383 (2000)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins, J. M. et al. Overview of the Kepler Science Processing Pipeline. Astrophys. J. 713, L87–L91 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meibom, S. et al. The Kepler Cluster Study: stellar rotation in NGC6811. Astrophys. J. 733, L9–L12 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Janes, K., Barnes, S. A., Meibom, S. & Hoq, S. NGC6811: an intermediate-age cluster in the Kepler field. Astron. J. 145, 7–21 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss, L. M. et al. The mass of KOI-94d and a relation for planet radius, mass, and incident flux. Astrophys. J. 768, 14–32 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scally, A. & Clarke, C. Destruction of protoplanetary discs in the Orion nebula cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 449–456 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonnell, I. A. et al. Planetary dynamics in stellar clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, 859–865 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, K. W. & Bonnell, I. A. Free-floating planets in stellar clusters? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, L1–L4 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fregeau, J. M., Chatterjee, S. & Rasio, F. A. Dynamical interactions of planetary systems in dense stellar environments. Astrophys. J. 640, 1086–1098 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adams, F. C., Proszkow, E. M., Fatuzzo, M. & Myers, P. C. Early evolution of stellar groups and clusters: environmental effects on forming planetary systems. Astrophys. J. 641, 504–525 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Malmberg, D. et al. Close encounters in young stellar clusters: implications for planetary systems in the solar neighbourhood. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 378, 1207–1216 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spurzem, R., Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C. & Lin, D. N. C. Dynamics of planetary systems in star clusters. Astrophys. J. 697, 458–482 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haisch, K. E., Lada, E. A. & Lada, C. J. Disk frequencies and lifetimes in young clusters. Astrophys. J. 553, L153–L156 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kroupa, P. The IMF of simple and composite populations. Astron. Soc. Pacif. Conf. Ser. 390, 303–315 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gautier, T. N. et al. Kepler-20: a Sun-like star with three sub-Neptune exoplanets and two Earth-size candidates. Astrophys. J. 749, 15–33 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kepler was competitively selected as the tenth Discovery mission. Funding for this mission is provided by NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. S.M. acknowledges support through NASA grant NNX09AH18A (The Kepler Cluster Study) and from the Kepler mission via NASA Cooperative Agreement NCC2-1390. G.T. acknowledges support through NASA’s Kepler Participating Scientist Program grant NNX12AC75G. L.A.R. acknowledges NASA support through Hubble Fellowship grant HF-51313.01-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    Søren Meibom, Guillermo Torres, Francois Fressin & David W. Latham

  2. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035, California, USA

    Jason F. Rowe, Steven T. Bryson, Christopher E. Henze & Steve B. Howell

  3. NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA

    David R. Ciardi

  4. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA

    Leslie A. Rogers

  5. Boston University, Boston, 02215, Massachusetts, USA

    Kenneth Janes

  6. Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics, Potsdam 14467, Germany,

    Sydney A. Barnes

  7. Space Science Institute, Boulder, 80301, Colorado, USA

    Sydney A. Barnes

  8. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Geoffrey W. Marcy & Howard Isaacson

  9. Yale University, New Haven, 06520, Connecticut, USA

    Debra A. Fischer

  10. Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, 06515, Connecticut, USA

    Elliott P. Horch

  11. SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035, California, USA

    Jon M. Jenkins

  12. National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, 85719, Arizona, USA

    Simon C. Schuler

  13. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, 46556, Indiana, USA

    Justin Crepp

Authors
  1. Søren Meibom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillermo Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francois Fressin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David W. Latham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jason F. Rowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David R. Ciardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Steven T. Bryson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Leslie A. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christopher E. Henze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kenneth Janes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sydney A. Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Geoffrey W. Marcy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Howard Isaacson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Debra A. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Steve B. Howell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Elliott P. Horch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jon M. Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Simon C. Schuler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Justin Crepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.M. is the Principal Investigator of The Kepler Cluster Study and led the writing of the paper and the effort to identify members of NGC6811. He worked with G.T. and F.F. on characterization and validation of Kepler-66b and Kepler-67b, and with K.J. and S.A.B. on determination of the properties of NGC6811. G.T. developed the BLENDER software used to validate the planets, and determined the stellar properties of the host stars. F.F. worked on the BLENDER validation of the two planets and the Monte-Carlo simulation of the cluster yield. D.W.L. contributed follow-up spectroscopy of host stars. J.F.R. performed the light-curve analysis to extract the planet characteristics. D.R.C. provided constraints on angular separation of potential background blends from adaptive optics imaging. S.T.B. performed pixel-level centroid analysis. C.E.H. assisted in running BLENDER on the NASA Pleiades supercomputer. L.A.R. modelled the planets’ interior structure to constrain the range of possible masses and compositions. K.J. led the supporting photometric study from which the bulk properties of NGC6811 are derived. S.A.B. participated in the acquisition of ground-based spectroscopic and photometric data on NGC6811. G.W.M. and H.I. obtained and analysed high-resolution Keck HIRES spectra of the host stars used for the BLENDER analysis. D.A.F. analysed HIRES spectra using the Spectroscopy Made Easy software. S.B.H. and E.P.H. obtained and analysed speckle observations of the host stars. J.M.J. led the efforts of data collection, data processing and data review that yielded the Kepler time series photometry. S.C.S. did spectroscopic analysis of stellar members of NGC6811 to aid in the determination of cluster parameters including metallicity. J.C. obtained adaptive optics imaging observations.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Meibom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-4, Supplementary Figures 1-3 and additional references. (PDF 3389 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meibom, S., Torres, G., Fressin, F. et al. The same frequency of planets inside and outside open clusters of stars. Nature 499, 55–58 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12279

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing