Main

The ability to measure1,2,3,4 and stabilize1,2 the CE phase of few-cycle laser pulses, that is, the ability to completely control ultrashort high-intensity electromagnetic fields, provides access to a whole series of novel physical phenomena, and creates options for their coherent control. An example is the manipulation of the electron recombination process during ‘re-collision’11, with the aim of fully controlling the generation of both intense vacuum-ultraviolet higher-harmonic radiation12,13 as well as of high-intensity single attosecond pulses. The progress has led to the establishment of a new field of research, ‘attosecond science’, with highlights of recent work including the efficient tomography of molecular wavefunctions by coherent diffraction of rescattered electrons14, as well as the preparation of high-intensity, monochromatic femtosecond electron beams evolving from ‘bubble generation’15,16,17,18. Many of the phenomena studied depend critically on the CE phase. Examples include the dynamics of above-threshold ionization (ATI)4, light-induced non-sequential double ionization19, Gouy phase observation20, and quantum interference in photocurrents21. An exciting prospect is the application of the CE phase as a coherent-control tool, for example, to steer bound electrons in molecules22.

Few-cycle pulses can be represented as , with ω being the angular frequency of the carrier wave and E0(t) being the envelope function with its maximum at t=0. Here ϕCE defines the CE (or absolute) phase. The state-of-the-art method for its determination in the case of amplified laser pulses is stereo ATI23,24, whereas the alternative f-to-2f interferometry method1,2, in practice, only tracks changes in the CE phase. In this letter, we present a new approach for CE phase determination on the basis of down-conversion into the THz frequency range in a laser-generated ambient air plasma. The concept relies on the detection of the THz electromagnetic pulses emitted during photo-ionization of the air by the focused few-cycle pulses. The method is easy to apply, because it does not require a vacuum chamber and relies on standard optoelectronic THz detection technology5,8.

THz-pulse emission from laser-generated plasmas has been investigated in the past, but only with much longer laser pulses. There, the transient electric currents responsible for the THz radiation have their origin either in ponderomotive forces25, the Coulomb force of an externally applied d.c. bias5,6, or an optical ‘a.c. bias’ achieved by superimposing the light pulses with their own second-harmonic radiation7,8,9,10. The THz-wave generation mechanism for the latter has been discussed in terms of a four-wave mixing process7,9,10. For the present case where the pulse spectra are octave-spanning, four-wave mixing results in a low-frequency (Ω→0) polarization: , because the CE phases ϕCE of all three input waves with spectral intensities I(ωi) are the same (as all frequency components arise from the same near-transform-limited few-cycle pulse). Therefore, the CE phase is directly imparted onto the single-cycle THz pulse, and thus can be determined by means of electro-optic measurement of the THz field amplitude. The same argument concerning the transfer of the CE phase to the THz field can be readily generalized to the case of higher-order nonlinear contributions. Although such a wave-mixing process illustrates the mechanism for CE phase-sensitive THz generation, we will give an alternative description on the basis of static-tunnelling theory26, which explains the origin of nonlinear polarization on a microscopic level. For simplicity, we assume that the air only consists of N2. Figure 1 shows the calculated ionization rate wtun for N2 at a pressure of 1 atm, and the ionization probability rate of a single molecule, respectively. The strongly nonlinear intensity dependence of the ionization rate translates into temporal ionization patterns as illustrated in Fig. 2. The upper panels display the two pulse shapes considered here, both with the same pulse duration of τ=6 fs (full-width at half-maximum), the same centre wavelength of λ=800 nm, and the same peak electric field of the envelope of Eopt0=4.2×1010 V m−1, but with different CE phases, ϕCE=0 and ϕCE=π/2. The middle panels of Fig. 2 show the time evolution of the ionization rates for the two cases. A common signature is that only the three or four most-intense half-cycles of the pulses ionize a significant amount of molecules. The ionization rate at each half cycle, however, depends sensitively on the CE phase. This becomes even clearer when we calculate the temporal evolution of the plasma density. We distinguish two quantities, ρ+(t) and ρ(t), which describe the densities of free electrons produced at positive and negative polarity of the optical laser field, respectively. The total density of free electrons is given by ρtotal=ρ+(t)+ρ(t). The lower pair of panels of Fig. 2 show that for ϕCE=0, the total plasma density generated at negative field polarity is significantly smaller than the density for positive polarity. For ϕCE=π/2, the densities only differ a little after the pulse has passed through the focus.

Figure 1: Ionization rate for N2 versus electric field strength on the basis of the static-tunnelling theory as a function of the optical field strength, and the light intensity respectively.
figure 1

The calculation was carried out with the help of equation (1). An ionization rate of 1015 s −1 corresponds to a probability of 100% for a molecule to be ionized during a time interval of 1 fs. Note that the probability for ionization of a molecule has a value of 1% per fs at a threshold field of 3.3×1010 V m−1 (vertical black line), and that the ionization probability per fs already becomes 100% at 5.5×1010 V m−1, that is, at less than twice the threshold field.

Figure 2: Optical electric field, ionization rate and plasma densities as a function of time for CE phases ϕCE=0 and ϕCE=π/2.
figure 2

The plasma densities ρ+ and ρ, generated at positive and negative field polarities, respectively, are calculated with equations (2) and (3) of the Methods section. The ionization threshold is the arbitrarily chosen electric-field value where the ionization probability is 1% per fs.

In this simplified model, we assume that electrons generated at positive field polarity experience a displacement in the positive field direction due to acceleration in the laser field and incoherent scattering of a majority of the electrons by neighbouring molecules/ions on a timescale of tsc≈1 fs (see the Methods section). Correspondingly, electrons generated at negative polarity are displaced in the negative direction. Such a collective charge displacement after the passage of the pulse () creates a quasi-d.c. macroscopic dipole moment. Because of its transient character, it acts as the source of an electromagnetic pulse, whose polarity and field amplitude are determined by the ratio , a quantity that is proportional to the maximal generated dipole moment. A value of corresponds to the highest possible THz pulse amplitude, with the polarity of the signal depending on the sign of . For , the THz emission vanishes. Figure 3 displays as a function of ϕCE for laser pulses with gaussian envelopes of various durations τ. It is found that the magnitude of is directly related to the CE phase with a nearly cosine-like dependence. The contrast, however, rapidly decays when the pulse duration rises towards 10 fs.

Figure 3: Asymmetry parameter of the plasma density versus CE phase for several pulse durations.
figure 3

is proportional to the macroscopic quasi-d.c. dipole moment, which is responsible for the emission of the THz radiation. The pulse intensity is chosen so that a plasma density ρtotal of 10% of the molecule density ρgas0 is obtained. Inset: Maximal value of at ϕCE=0 as a function of the pulse duration.

Although the theory for stereo ATI requires modelling of both the quiver motion and re-collision of electrons, this is not necessary for THz emission from a plasma generated at atmospheric pressure. The reason for this is that the coherent motion of the majority of electrons is terminated by ultrafast scattering before re-collision, and the THz signal is proportional to the asymmetry in the tunnelling process. Therefore the signal in our method, for tsc≈1 fs, is directly related to the CE phase such that a cosine-like pulse (ϕCE=0) will produce a maximum asymmetry in ionization rates and also a maximum THz signal. A larger tsc would introduce a phase shift. Finally, the THz method introduced would directly measure the absolute CE phase, if the plasma were a point object27. However, the CE phase itself may vary due to dispersion in the plasma, resulting in a concomitant interference of the THz signals generated along the length of the plasma.

An experimental test of these theoretical findings was carried out by THz-emission spectroscopy with phase-stabilized 8-fs amplified laser pulses (see the Methods section for a detailed description of the setup shown in Fig. 4). We measured the THz field value from a laser-generated air plasma at a fixed temporal position (that with the largest amplitude of the THz transients) while continuously varying the CE phase by slowly ramping the set-point of the control loop (with a slope of 2π per minute). An exemplary time series spanning 8 min is shown in Fig. 5a. The CE phase data measured in the frequency domain by two f-to-2f interferometers2 (CEP2 and CEP3) are compared with the THz data. The THz signal varies with the ramped CE phase, as expected from the model calculations shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 4: Experimental setup.
figure 4

a, Schematic diagram of the laser system. AOM, acousto-optical modulator; CEP1, f-to-2f interferometer used for CE phase stabilization with fast feedback; CPA, chirped pulse amplification and compression; CEP2, f-to-2f interferometer used for compensation of slow drifts of the CE phase; gas-filled fibre used for spectral broadening; CEP3, f-to-2f interferometer only used for CE phase measurements; BS, beam splitter. b, THz system used for electro-optical THz detection. Inset: A temporal THz wave-form obtained with applied d.c. bias.

Figure 5: Experimental results.
figure 5

a, Variation of the CE phase of 8-fs pulses obtained by slowly ramping the set-point of the control loop. The CE phase is measured by a f-to-2f interferometer (CEP2) directly behind the laser amplifier, another f-to-2f interferometer (CEP3) behind the recompressor, and by the THz measurement system by means of electro-optical detection of the THz radiation generated in an ambient air plasma. The integration time constant of the lock-in amplifier in the THz measurements was 100 ms. In addition, a sliding average was calculated numerically, bringing the effective integration time constant to 5 s. Dispersion effects result in an arbitrary offset between the CE phases measured by CEP2, CEP3 and the THz system. b, Variation of the CE phase of 8-fs pulses by a change of the dispersion in the beam path, realized by two variable glass wedges. c, Adjacent average of the correlation of the CEP3 and the THz data. The window chosen for averaging was ±0.5 rad of CEP3. For the averaging, the total data pool recorded within 74 min is taken into account. The error bar shows the standard deviation of this averaging. The solid line shows the results of model calculations of for an 8-fs pulse (constant scaling factor between theory and experiment). The peak electric field used for calculations is Eopt0=4×1010 V m−1 corresponding to the expected value in the experiment.

In a second experiment, the CE phase was kept constant in the oscillator and laser amplifier (CEP2), but varied with the help of a piezo-driven glass-wedge pair behind the pulse compressor and in front of both the third f-to-2f interferometer (CEP3) and the THz system (also with a phase ramping of 2π per minute). The results are shown in Fig. 5b. The measurements again consolidate the expected change of the THz signal with varying CE phase.

To provide a more quantitative analysis of the measurements, in Fig. 5c we show the THz signal as a function of the CEP3 data (open circles), averaged over a 74-min time series, where we ramped the phase of the oscillator as in Fig. 5a. The error bar indicates the standard deviation of the THz signal values. The correlation between THz signal and CEP3 compares well to the dependence predicted in Fig. 3 for 8-fs pulses (full line in Fig. 5c). The slight deviation of the theoretical data from the experimental data may be a consequence of a non-gaussian shape of the envelope.

The status of the THz approach for CE phase determination can be considered as a proof-of-principle. Nevertheless, to classify its current precision, we compare it with stereo ATI, which achieves a 3σ error of 100 mrad for 10 s of data acquisition and for 6.5-fs 20-μJ pulses24. The precision reached with the THz system is 700 mrad for 10 s of data acquisition for 8-fs 66-μJ pulses. Considering the factor-of-four improvement to be achieved with 6.5-fs instead of 8-fs pulses (see Fig. 3), the THz approach compares well to the much more mature ATI method already. The sensitivity of low-repetition-rate THz-detection can be enhanced significantly by box-car techniques or by THz interferometry with intensity detection over a large THz-photon bandwidth.

Methods

Ionization model used in the simulations

We base the quantitative description of the photo-ionization process of atoms and molecules on static-tunnelling theory26, with the following expression for the ionization rate:

where ωa=4.13×1016 s−1 is the atomic frequency unit, Ea=5.145×1011 V m−1 is the atomic unit of the electric field, and Eopt is the optical field strength. denote the ionization potentials of atomic hydrogen and molecular nitrogen, respectively. The simple tunnelling model is known to describe the experimental data for N2 well if the intensity of the laser pulses is above 1014 W cm−2, and to achieve a fair agreement down to 5×1013 W cm−2 (ref. 28).

Temporal evolution of plasma density and THZ polarization

The emitted THz field is proportional to the second time derivative of the slowly varying component of the plasma polarization. In the following treatment, we assume that each ionization event contributes the same average dipole moment to this polarization, with the sign depending on the direction of the laser field during each optical half cycle. This reduces the problem to finding the generated plasma densities at each laser field polarity ρ± (see below). This approximate model is supported by the following considerations. The spatial amplitude of electron motion for the electric fields considered here is comparable to the average distance between the molecules at atmospheric pressure (3 nm). Hence, it is probable that a large fraction of the electrons collide with neighbouring atoms and ions during the first excursion away from their parent ions. This scattering will terminate their coherent contribution to the plasma polarization on the associated timescale tsc≈1 fs. We find experimental evidence for such ultrafast scattering in measurements of the type reported in ref. 8 but extended to above-ambient pressure (data to be published). It is observed that the THz signal strongly decreases above 2 bar, which can be explained by a further decrease in the scattering time below that of an optical half cycle.

We compute the plasma densities ρ+(t) and ρ(t) by solving the following coupled differential equations:

Here, ρgas0=2.7×1019 cm−3 is the density of N2 molecules at atmospheric pressure assuming that air only consists of N2. Eopt(t) denotes the electric field strength of the laser pulse. We neglect plasma recombination, which occurs on a much longer timescale29. We assume the following temporal wave-form of the laser pulse:

where A(t) is a gaussian envelope. Although such a product separation of carrier and envelope can become ill-defined as the pulse duration approaches the sub-cycle range30, it is perfectly reasonable for the shortest pulse durations we consider here. Eopt0 is assumed to be limited in the calculations as a consequence of self-defocusing of the light beam in the plasma31. The Eopt0 value in the calculations in this paper is chosen so that the resulting total plasma density is 10%.

Light source

The experiments were carried out with a light source as shown in Fig. 4a. A commercially available Ti:sapphire Multipass CPA System ‘Femtopower Compact Pro’ (Femtolasers) is seeded with a self-built laser oscillator (pulse energy 4 nJ, pulse duration 20 fs, centre wavelength 810 nm, CE phase stabilized with f-to-2f self-referencing1 (CEP1)) and driven at a repetition rate of 2.8 kHz. Its output (500 μJ, 30 fs, at 805 nm) is focused into a gas-filled hollow fibre (inner diameter 200 μm, length 82 cm, 4.5 bar neon). A small fraction of the CPA output (few μJ) are used for a f-to-2f interferometer2 (CEP2) to correct for slow CE phase drifts in the amplifier. The fibre output is then compressed to its bandwidth-limited duration of 8 fs using dispersive mirrors and a prism-compressor sequence with two fused silica prisms, with final output parameters (83 μJ, 8 fs, at 750 nm (centre wavelength)).

THZ-emission spectroscopy system

80% of the final output is fed into the THz detection setup, which is shown in Fig. 4b. 10% (the residual 10% are unused) is used for a third f-to-2f interferometer2 (CEP3), which traces CE phase changes for direct comparison with the THz data in respect to a constant arbitrary offset. The THz system is a typical THz pump–probe measurement system with balanced electro-optical THz detection5,8, the whole setup is fitted on a 30×45-cm breadboard. The pump beam is mechanically chopped at half the laser repetition rate. The plasma is generated in the focus of an off-axis paraboloidal mirror with an effective focal length of 76 mm. For optimization of the alignment and a first determination of the zero-delay point for the THz detection, an additional d.c. bias field can be applied to the focal region5. The probe beam passes along a variable delay line and is focused collinearly with the THz beam into the electro-optical ZnTe detector crystal. The THz wave-form, as measured with a d.c.-biased air plasma, is shown in the lower left part of Fig. 4b. For the CE phase measurements, the delay stage of the probe beam is positioned at the zero-delay point where the strongest THz signal is obtained, and the external bias field is switched off.