Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement

Abstract

Quantum mechanics hinders our ability to determine the state of a physical system in two ways: individual measurements provide only partial information about the observed system (because of Heisenberg uncertainty), and measurements are themselves invasive—meaning that little or no refinement is achieved by further observation of an already measured system1. Theoretical methods have been developed to maximize the information gained from a quantum measurement while also minimizing disturbance2,3,4, but laboratory implementation of optimal measurement procedures is often difficult. The standard class of operations considered in quantum information theory5 tends to rely on superposition-basis and entangled measurements6, which require high-fidelity implementation to be effective in the laboratory7. Here we demonstrate that real-time quantum feedback8,9,10 can be used in place of a delicate quantum superposition, often called a ‘Schrödinger cat state’, to implement an optimal quantum measurement for discriminating between optical coherent states11,12. Our procedure actively manipulates the target system during the measurement process, and uses quantum feedback to modify the statistics of an otherwise sub-optimal operator to emulate the optimal cat-state measurement. We verify a long-standing theoretical prediction13 and demonstrate feedback-mediated quantum measurement10,14 at its fundamental quantum limit over a non-trivial region of parameter space.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Closed-loop quantum state discrimination.
Figure 2: State preparation and control displacement calibration.
Figure 3: Laboratory observation of sub-shot-noise state discrimination.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1955)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kraus, K. Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 190, States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1983)

  3. Peres, A. & Wooters, W. K. Optimal detection of quantum information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1119–1122 (1991)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs, C. A. & Peres, A. Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2038–2045 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Science (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Peres, A. Neumark’s theorem and quantum inseparability. Found. Phys. 20, 1441–1453 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Leibfried, D. et al. Toward Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states. Science 304, 1476–1478 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiseman, H. M. & Milburn, G. J. All-optical versus electro-optical quantum-limited feedback. Phys. Rev. A 49, 4110–4125 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty, A. C., Habib, S., Jacobs, K., Mabuchi, H. & Tan, S. M. Quantum feedback control and classical control theory. Phys. Rev. A 62, 012105–012117 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geremia, J., Stockton, J. K. & Mabuchi, H. Real-time quantum feedback control of atomic spin-squeezing. Science 304, 270–273 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Helstrom, C. W. Detection theory and quantum mechanics. Inform. Control 10, 254–291 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki-Usuda, T. & Hirota, O. in Quantum Communication and Measurement (eds Belavkin, V. P., Hirota, O. & Hudson, L.) 419–428 (Plenum, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dolinar, S. Quarterly Progress Report (Tech. Rep. 111, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Armen, M. A., Au, J. K., Stockton, J. K., Doherty, A. C. & Mabuchi, H. Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 133602–133605 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Helstrom, C. W. Mathematics in Science and Engineering Vol. 123, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic, New York, 1976)

  16. Fuchs, C. A. Distinguishability and Accessible Information in Quantum Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. New Mexico (1996); 〈http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/9601020〉 (1996)

  17. Geremia, J. Distinguishing between optical coherent states with imperfect detection. Phys. Rev. A 70, 062303–062311 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki, M. & Hirota, O. Quantum decision scheme with a unitary control process for binary quantum-state signals. Phys. Rev. A 54, 2728–2736 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiseman, H. M. Adaptive phase measurements of optical modes: Going beyond the marginal Q distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4587–4590 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. M. Wiseman, H. Mabuchi, S. Dolinar, K. Jacobs, A. Landahl, C. Caves, I. Deutsch and P. Jessen for discussions. This work was supported by the AFOSR and the New Mexico NSF EPSCoR programme in nanotechnology.

Author Contributions All authors contributed equally to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Geremia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, R., Martin, P. & Geremia, J. Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement. Nature 446, 774–777 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05655

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing