Predators avoid look-alikes of venomous snakes only when the real thing is around.
Batesian mimicry holds that palatable species look like dangerous species because both are then protected from predation1,2,3,4,5. But this protection should break down where the dangerous model is absent, when predators would not be under selection to recognize the model or any other species resembling it as dangerous2,4,5. Here we provide experimental evidence to support this critical prediction of Batesian mimicry by demonstrating that predators avoid harmless look-alikes of venomous coral snakes only in areas that are inhabited by these deadly snakes.
Many coral snakes and non-venomous kingsnakes possess red, yellow (or white), and black ringed markings6, which predators avoid7, though often without prior experience8. To determine whether this avoidance depends on the model's presence in the vicinity, we constructed snake replicas7 (1.5 cm × 18 cm cylinders of pre-coloured, non-toxic plasticine threaded onto an S-shaped wire) with a tricolour ringed pattern, a striped pattern with identical colours and proportions as the ringed replicas, or a plain brown pattern.
Ringed replicas conformed to the local mimic: scarlet kingsnakes (Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides), which resemble eastern coral snakes (Micrurus fulvius)9, or sonoran mountain kingsnakes (L. pyromelana), which resemble western coral snakes (Micruroides euryxanthus)10; striped and brown replicas served as controls. We arranged three different replicas (triplets) 2 m apart in natural habitat (each was used once only). At each site, 10 triplets were placed 75 m apart in a line. After collection, a person without knowledge of the replica's location scored attacks by noting any impressions corresponding to a predator7.
We tested whether predators avoid L. t. elapsoides only in areas inhabited by Micrurus by placing 10 triplets at eight sympatric sites (sites with mimic and model) and eight allopatric sites (sites with only the mimic) in North and South Carolina, USA (480 replicas; allopatric sites were more than 80 km outside Micrurus's range9,11; sites were 16–420 km apart). After 4 weeks, 25 (5.2%) replicas had been attacked by carnivores. The mean (±s.e.m.) proportion of ringed replicas attacked was significantly greater in allopatry (0.654 ± 0.107) than in sympatry (0.083 ± 0.116; P = 0.009, 2-tailed Wilcoxon two-group test).
We next investigated whether predators avoid L. pyromelana only in sympatry with Micruroides by placing 10 triplets at 24 sites (720 replicas) along an elevational gradient (1,204–2,866 m) near Portal, Arizona (Micruroides only occur at altitudes below 1,770 m (ref. 10); there were 14 sympatric and 10 allopatric sites 3–100 km apart). After 2 weeks, 49 (6.8%) replicas had been attacked by carnivores.
The mean proportion of ringed replicas attacked was significantly greater in allopatry (0.496 ± 0.078) than in sympatry (0.138 ± 0.060; P = 0.006). Moreover, in sympatry, the proportion of ringed replicas attacked (0.138) was significantly less than randomness (0.33; P = 0.010, 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test). By contrast, attacks were random in allopatry (P = 0.188). Thus, predators avoid coral snake mimics only in sympatry with the model.
Coral snakes become increasingly rare with increasing latitude (Spearman ρ = − 0.57, P = 0.014)11 and elevation (ρ = − 0.77, P = 0.026; our unpublished results). Consequently, selection to avoid ringed patterns should weaken with increasing latitude and elevation. As expected, the proportion of ringed replicas attacked increased gradually with latitude and elevation (Fig. 1), suggesting that selection to avoid ringed patterns is indeed sensitive to the abundance of coral snakes.
Our results do not fully resolve why mimetic patterns occur where models are absent6,9,10,11. Possibly selection for mimicry in sympatry, coupled with gene flow between sympatric and allopatric populations12, maintains mimetic patterns in both regions. Nevertheless, our results verify the critical prediction of Batesian mimicry and demonstrate that the benefits of mimicry depend on abundance of the model.
References
Bates, H. W. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 495–566 (1862).
Wallace, A. R. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection (Macmillan, London, 1870).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. A Complete Variorum Edition (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999).
Waldbauer, G. P. Evol. Biol. 22, 227–259 (1988).
Maynard Smith, J. Evolutionary Genetics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
Greene, H. W. & McDiarmid, R. Y. Science 213, 1207–1212 (1981).
Brodie, E. D. Evolution 47, 227–235 (1993).
Smith, S. M. Science 187, 759–760 (1975).
Conant, R. & Collins, J. T. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1998).
Stebbins, R. C. Western Reptiles and Amphibians (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1985).
Palmer, W. M. & Braswell, A. L. Reptiles of North Carolina (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, 1995).
King, R. B. & Lawson, R. BioScience 47, 279–286 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pfennig, D., Harcombe, W. & Pfennig, K. Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410, 323 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35066628
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35066628
This article is cited by
-
Effects of predator associative learning and innate aversion on mimicry complexes
Evolutionary Ecology (2023)
-
Predator-based selection and the impact of edge sympatry on components of coral snake mimicry
Evolutionary Ecology (2022)
-
Colours as aggregation signals in Lepidoptera: Are Heliconius Müllerian mimics?
Evolutionary Ecology (2022)
-
Intrasexual variability of a conspicuous social signal influences attack rate of lizard models in an experimental test
Evolutionary Ecology (2021)
-
Batesian mimicry has evolved with deleterious effects of the pleiotropic gene doublesex
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.