Abstract
Abstract. Economic interactions often imply to gauge the trustworthiness of others. Recent studies showed that when making trust decisions in economic games, people have some accuracy in detecting trustworthiness from the facial features of unknown partners. Here we provide evidence that this face-based trustworthiness detection is a fast and intuitive process by testing its performance at split-second levels of exposure. Participants played a Trust game, in which they made decisions whether to trust another player based on their picture. In two studies, we manipulated the exposure time of the picture. We observed that trustworthiness detection remained better than chance for exposure times as short as 100 ms, although it disappeared with an exposure time of 33 ms. We discuss implications for ongoing debates on the use of facial inferences for social and economic decisions.
References
2014). Exploring the unconscious using faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 35–45.
(1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.
(2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 467–484.
(2013). The modular nature of trustworthiness detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 143–150.
(2015). Face-ism and kernels of truth in facial inferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 421–422.
(2017). Can we detect cooperators by looking at their face? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 276–281.
(2012). Does the trust game measure trust? Economics Letters, 115, 20–23.
(2015). Honest signaling in trust interactions: Smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher earnings opportunities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 8–16.
(2010). Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 87–105.
(2007). Inequity aversion and trustees’ reciprocity in the trust game. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 1007–1024.
(2006a). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428–433.
(2006b). Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing in reasoning: Chronometric and dual task considerations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1070–1100.
(2013). The whys and whens of individual differences in thinking biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 172–178.
(2013). Low second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts indiscriminate social suspicion, not improved trustworthiness detection. Biology Letters, 9, 20130037.
(2015). Adolescents gradually improve at detecting trustworthiness from the facial features of unknown adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 17–22.
(2003). Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5, 93–137.
(2013). Viewing men’s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–7.
(2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdale. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1508–1519.
(2009). The psychology (and economics) of trust. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1003–1017.
(2013). Dual process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
(2014). Amygdala responsivity to high-level social information from unseen faces. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 10573–10581.
(2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846.
(2008). Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18, 59–92.
(2005). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 365–385.
(2016). JASP (Version 0.8) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889.
(2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
(2013). Accuracy in discrimination of self-reported cooperators using static facial information. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 507–512.
(2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690.
(2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 566–570.
(2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110.
(2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413–425.
(2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS One, 7, e34293.
(2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426.
(1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1–29.
(2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354.
(2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person-situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19, 249.
(2015). Response to Bonnefon et al.: Limited “kernels of truth” in facial inferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 422–423.
(2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626.
(2014). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545.
(2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813–833.
(2013). Is cooperativeness readable in static facial features? An inter-cultural approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 427–432.
(2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 71–76.
(2008). Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108, 796–803.
(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
(2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t-tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291–298.
(2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after 100 ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
(2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26, 1325–1331.
(