Skip to main content
Original Article

The Motivation for Facebook Use – Is it a Matter of Bonding or Control Over Others?

Evidence From a Cross-Cultural Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000273

Abstract. In the present study, we investigated individual differences in the motivation for Facebook use. In total N = 736 participants from Europe and Asia took part in the study. They filled in the Facebook questionnaire (FQ), including the two factors Attitude toward Facebook and Online Sociability, and the Unified Motive Scale (UMS-3), measuring the motives Achievement, Affiliation, Intimacy, Power, and Fear. The results showed that the Attitude toward Facebook was more positive in the subsample from Asia, but no differences could be found between the Asian and European sample with respect to the frequency of use of different activities on Facebook. The motives Fear, Power, Affiliation, and Intimacy significantly predicted the FQ factor Attitudes. Furthermore, the Attitude toward Facebook mediated the associations between the motives Power/Affiliation and Online Sociability. However, these results were only found for the European sample. The associations found suggest the important role of different motives such as Power/Affiliation for the study of Facebook use. The present work shows the possibility of motivational factors for Facebook use to differ depending on the culture. The study adds to the literature by investigating a classic motivation theory in the context of Facebook use.

References

  • Abell, L. & Brewer, G. (2014). Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.076 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ames, D. R., Rose, P. & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beyens, I., Frison, E. & Eggermont, S. (2016). “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof-Kastner, C., Kuntsche, E. & Wolstein, J. (2014). Identifying problematic internet users: Development and validation of the internet motive questionnaire for adolescents (IMQ-A). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e230. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3398 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., Benvenuti, M., Cannata, D., Ciobanu, A. M., Senol-Durak, E., … Popa, C. (2016). Cultural and personality predictors of Facebook intrusion: A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01895 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodroža, B. & Jovanović, T. (2016). Validation of the new scale for measuring behaviors of Facebook users: Psycho-social aspects of Facebook use (PSAFU). Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.032 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K. & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific internet-use disorders: An interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chabrol, H., Laconi, S., Delfour, M. & Moreau, A. (2017). Contributions of psychopathological and interpersonal variables to problematic Facebook use in adolescents and young adults. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction, 6, e32773. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.32773 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, W. M. & Klinger, E. (1988). A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.97.2.168 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cutler, N. E. & Danowski, J. A. (1980). Process gratification in aging cohorts. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 57, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700210 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • DSM History. (2017). DSM-5 table of contents. Retrieved April 10, 2017 from https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/history-of-the-dsm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Engeser, S. & Langens, T. (2010). Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five‐factor model of personality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Facebook. (2016). Facebook: Company info. Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fox, J. & Rooney, M. C. (2015). The dark triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia, D. & Sikström, S. (2014). The dark side of Facebook: Semantic representations of status updates predict the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, L. T. & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Personality profiles associated with different motivations for playing World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0090 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.1.7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London, UK: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, N. (1977). Communication effects: Review and commentary. Communication Yearbook, 1, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1977.11923670 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marino, C., Vieno, A., Altoè, G. & Spada, M. M. (2016). Factorial validity of the problematic Facebook use scale for adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marino, C., Vieno, A., Moss, A. C., Caselli, G., Nikčević, A. V. & Spada, M. M. (2016). Personality, motives and metacognitions as predictors of problematic Facebook use in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.053 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marino, C., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., Albery, I. P., Frings, D. & Spada, M. M. (2016). Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 63, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McAdams, D. P. (1980). A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(80)90001-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation, CUP Archive. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miles, J. & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montag, C. & Panksepp, J. (2017). Primary emotional systems and personality: An evolutionary perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R. & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, T., Chester, A., Reece, J. & Xenos, S. (2014). The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, T. & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D. & Gerstenberg, F. X. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The unified motive scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schonfeld, E. (2010). Facebook closing in on 500 million visitors a month. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2010/04/21/facebook-500-million-visitors-comscore/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shepherd, R. & Edelmann, R. J. (2005). Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sigerson, L. & Cheng, C. (2018). Scales for measuring user engagement with social network sites: A systematic review of psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.023 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sokolowski, K. & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Social bonding: Affiliation motivation and intimacy motivation. In J. HeckhausenH. HeckhausenEds., Motivation and action (pp. 184–201). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N. & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.06.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wegmann, E. & Brand, M. (2016). Internet-communication disorder: It’s a matter of social aspects, coping, and internet-use expectancies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01747 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wegmann, E., Oberst, U., Stodt, B. & Brand, M. (2017). Online-specific fear of missing out and internet-use expectancies contribute to symptoms of internet-communication disorder. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 5, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D. & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar