Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

Development and Validation of the Perceived Societal Marginalization Scale

Published Online:May 26, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000651

Abstract

Abstract. Current societal conflicts are characterized by identity struggles and discontent concerning globalization and modernization. While the literature identifies several psychological determinants of this discontent, systematic measurement approaches based on well-defined constructs are rare. Here, we present the development and validation of the Perceived Societal Marginalization (PSM) scale, which aims to assess individual differences in people’s subjective perceptions of the insignificance and lack of recognition of their own social groups in the domains of economy, culture, and politics. We first provide a definition of PSM and a conceptual analysis of its components based on (a) a top-down review of relevant psychological, sociological, and political science theories and (b) a bottom-up approach involving semi-structured group interviews with various German citizen associations followed by qualitative content analysis. We then present the results of psychometric validation of the PSM scale (factor structure, reliability) based on three large online surveys with heterogeneous samples (total N = 2,566) and explore sociodemographic, personality, and attitudinal correlates. The discussion focuses on applications of the PSM scale, that is, the role of PSM in explaining societal cleavages as well as threat perceptions towards and rejection of cultural, ethnic, and religious minorities.

References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014201 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3): Ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen [Authoritarianism short scale (KSA-3): An economic measure to assess three subdimensions of authoritarian attitudes] (GESIS-Working Papers No. 2014/35). GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-426711 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS): Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen [Political Efficacy short scale (PEKS): A measure to assess political competence and influence beliefs] (GESIS-Working Papers No. 2012/18). GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollwerk, M., Back, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2019a). Perceived Societal Marginalization. https://osf.io/zf8mx First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollwerk, M., Back, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2019b). Perceived Societal Marginalization. https://osf.io/yek5h First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollwerk, M., Back, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2021a). Data_study1_1_psyweb.csv; data_study1_2_psyweb.csv; data_study1_3_respondi.xlsx; data_study2_respondi.sav [Data Set]. https://osf.io/mu782 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollwerk, M., Back, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2021b, January 13). Perceived Societal Marginalization. https://osf.io/mu782/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Calabrese, R. L., & Adams, J. (1990). Alienation: A cause of juvenile delinquency. Adolescence, 25(98), 435–440. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., Shead, N. W., & Hodgins, D. C. (2008). Gambling as a search for justice: Examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1514–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322956 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, Article 7. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol10/iss1/7/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2017). The global refugee crisis: Empirical evidence and policy implications for improving public attitudes and facilitating refugee resettlement. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 78–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • European Social Survey (ESS). (2013). Round 6 Module on Europeans’ understandings and evaluations of democracy – final module in template. Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. (2017). German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES). https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/dienstleistung/forschungsdatenzentren/gles/Frage.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodhart, D. (2017). The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics, Hurst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Howard, M. C., & Melloy, R. C. (2016). Evaluating item-sort task methods: The presentation of a new statistical significance formula and methodological best practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9404-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP16-026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Issmer, C., & Wagner, U. (2015). Perceived marginalization and aggression: A longitudinal study with low-educated adolescents. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12075 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kovaleva, A., Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Kontrollüberzeugung: Die Skala Internale-Externale Kontrollüberzeugung-4 (IE-4) [A short-scale for measuring locus of control: The Internal-External-Locus-of-Control-Scale-4 (IE-4)] (GESIS-Working Papers No. 2012/19). GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-312096 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landmann, H., Gaschler, R., & Rohmann, A. (2019). What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basic principles and techniques] (rev 12th ed.). Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McLaren, L. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Minkenberg, M. (2000). The renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti‐modernity. Government and Opposition, 35(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peitz, L., Dhont, K., & Seyd, B. (2018). The psychology of supranationalism: Its ideological correlates and implications for EU attitudes and post‐Brexit preferences. Political Psychology, 39(6), 1305–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12542 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., Meertens, R. W., van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pratto, F., Çidam, A., Stewart, A. L., Zeineddine, F. B., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cohrs, J. C., Durrheim, K., Eicher, V., Foels, R., Górska, P., Lee, I., Licata, L., Liu, J. H., Li, L., Meyer, I., Morselli, D., … Henkel, K. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raines, T., Goodwin, M., & Cutts, D. (2017). The future of Europe: Comparing public and elite attitudes, Chatham House. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., Danner, D., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2018). Validation of the short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) and their German adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000481 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England, University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2015). Voluntary commitment to research transparency, Research Transparency. http://www.researchtransparency.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R., & Schulz, U. (2000). BSSS – Berliner Social-Support Skalen [BSSS – Berlin Social-Support Scales]. Freie Universität Berlin, Abteilung für Gesundheitspsychologie. http://userpage.fuberlin.de/~gesund/skalen/Berliner_Social_Support_Skalen/berliner_social_support_skalen.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sheets, P., Bos, L., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2015). Media cues and citizen support for right-wing populist parties. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2009). Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(5), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903232308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Six, B., Wolfrath, U., & Zick, A. (2001). Autoritarismus und Soziale Dominanzorientierung als generalisierte Einstellungen [Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as generalized attitudes]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 9, 23–40. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. J. (2001). Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. WalkerH. J. SmithEds., Relative deprivation (pp. 91–116). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527753.005 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., Esses, V. M., Stephan, C. W., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2017). Intergroup threat theory. In Y. Y. KimEd., The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (Vol. 3, pp. 1–12). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0162 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, B. D., Gulzaib, F., & Morris, D. S. M. (2019). Bridging political divides: Perceived threat and uncertainty avoidance help explain the relationship between political ideology and immigrant attitudes within diverse intergroup contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. JostJ. SidaniusEds., Political Psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • te Riele, K. (2006). Youth “at risk”: Further marginalizing the marginalized? Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500499968 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar