Abstract
Many studies on escalation of commitment observe only a single decision following negative feedback, although theoretical approaches to escalation behavior depict escalation as a progression over time. The present paper builds on Brockner and Rubin’s (1985) “tunnel vision” account that suggests a distinction between early and late stages of the escalation process. We used a dynamic paradigm, observing repeated decisions following negative feedback and manipulated choice and accountability in order to examine effects of justification on the progression of escalation behavior. Furthermore, reading times are used as a measure of effortful processing to investigate the mediating cognitive processes that lead to escalation behavior. Results show that the combination of choice with accountability leads to escalation behavior at later stages of the escalation process and that effortful processing mediates this interaction of choice, accountability, and escalation behavior.
References
1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.
(1994). Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 360–363.
(1982). Factors affecting entrapment in escalating conflicts: The importance of timing. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 247–266.
(1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts. New York: Springer.
(1981). Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 68–79.
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(1979). The trapped administrator: Effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 449–471.
(1993). Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences, 24, 977–994.
(2000). Escalation research: Providing new frontiers for applying behavior analysis to organizational behavior. Behavior Analyst, 23, 203–218.
(2005). Der Einfluss versunkener monetärer und zeitlicher Kosten auf Ressourcenallokationen [Sunk-cost effect and allocation of resources]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 49, 35–43.
(1993). Impact of “adverse selection” on managers’ project evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 635–643.
(1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
(1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49–63.
(1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275.
(1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144–158.
(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
(1986). Continuing investment under conditions of failure: A laboratory study of the limits to escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 280–284.
(2002). Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization’s attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 443–452.
(1990). Justification and the processing of information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 702–723.
(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating simple effects in mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
(2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1988). Escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 58–62.
(2002). Escalation of commitment during new product development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 103–118.
(1995). Response to failure, strategic flexibility, and learning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 677–700.
(1992). Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 419–426.
(1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 155–195.
(1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16, 27–44.
(1997). The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In , Organizational decision making (pp. 191–215). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2005). The escalation of commitment. Steps toward an organizational theory. In , Great minds in management (pp. 215–238). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1977). Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a chosen course of action. Human Relations, 30, 431–450.
(1980). Too much invested to quit. New York: Pergamon.
(1997). Log-linear models for event histories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1964/1921). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft
([Economy and society] . Tübingen, Germany: J.C. Mohr.