The Unitary Ability of IQ and Indexes in WAIS-IV
Abstract
Abstract.Lichtenberger and Kaufman (2009, p. 167) defined unitary ability as “an ability […] that is represented by a cohesive set of scaled scores, each reflecting slightly different or unique aspects of the ability.” Flanagan and Kaufman (2009) and Lichtenberger and Kaufman (2012), to define unitarity of IQ, use a difference of 23 IQ points between the highest score (Max) and the lowest score (Min) obtained by a subject in the four Indexes of WAIS-IV. A similar method has been used to assess the unitary ability for the four Indexes, with the threshold of 5. Such difference score (of 23 for IQ and 5 for Indexes) are considered high and infrequent and, the authors therefore conclude that the corresponding Full-Scale IQ score or Index score is uninterpretable. In this paper we argue that these thresholds are inappropriate because they are based on the wrong standard deviation. The main aim of this study was to establish variability thresholds for IQ and the WAIS-IV Indexes for the American standardization sample and to compare these thresholds with those for the Italian standardization sample. We also consider an alternative approach to determining whether an IQ score represents a unitary ability based on the maximum difference score for the 10 core subtests that contribute to Full-Scale IQ.
References
(2001). Use of the Tellegen & Briggs formula to determine the Dumont-Willis Indexes (DWI-1 & DWI-2) for the WISC-IV. Retrieved from http://alpha.edu/psychology/
(2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.) (Trad. It., Fondamenti per l’assessment con la WISC-IV. Firenze: Giunti-OS, 2012). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(1998). Tables for the use of range and studentized range in tests of hypotheses. New York, NY: CRC Press.
(2009). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(2012). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment, (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(2007). Psychometrie et WISC-IV: quel avenir pour l’identification des enfants à haut potentiel intellectuel?
[Psychometrics and WISC-IV: Which future for identifying children with high potential intelligence?] . Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 55, 214–219.(2012). Profils psicométriques de 60 enfants à haut potentiel au WISC-IV
[Psychometric profiles of 60 children with high potential in the WISC-IV] . Pratiques Psychologiques, 18, 63–74.(1966). Simultaneous statistical inferente. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2013). WAIS-IV. Contributo alla taratura italiana
[WAIS-IV. Contribution to the Italian standardization] . Firenze, Italy: Giunti OS.(2014). The unitary ability on IQ in the WISC-IV and its computation. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 173–175. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.023
(1962). Handbook of statistical table. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(1998).
The WISC-III in context . In A. PrifiteraD. H. SaklofskeEds., WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 1–38). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.(1987). Two Indexes of subtest scatter on Wechsler’s intelligence scales: Estimated vs. empirical values. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 409–414.
(1988). Estimated vs. empirical values of scaled score range on Wechsler’s intelligence scales: A correction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 259–260.
(1989). Reliability and abnormality of scaled-score ranges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 926–929.
(2008a). WAIS-IV administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
(2008b). WAIS-IV. Technical and Interpretive Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
(2013). WAIS-IV. Manuale di somministrazione e scoring. Firenze, Italy: Giunti OS.
