Skip to main content
Originalia

Der Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)

Erste teststatistische Überprüfung einer deutschen Adaption

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000079

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Der Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski, Kraaij & Spinhoven, 2001) erfasst neun Dimensionen kognitiver Emotionsregulation. Fragestellung: Es wurde eine deutsche Adaption des CERQ entwickelt und hinsichtlich Reliabilität, Dimensionalität und Zusammenhängen mit Depressivität und Angstsensitivität getestet. Methode: Die Studie wurde als postalische Fragebogenstudie durchgeführt. Von den zufällig ausgewählt und angeschriebenen 3000 Personen, sendeten 423 den Fragebogen zurück, die finale Stichprobe umfasste N = 414. Angstsensitivität und Depressivität wurden mit dem ASI-3 und dem PHQ-9 erfasst. Ergebnisse: Das 9-Faktorenmodell des CERQ konnte nach einer Verringerung auf drei Items pro Faktor zufriedenstellend repliziert werden. Angstsensitivität und Depressivität zeigten stärkere Zusammenhänge mit dysfunktionalen als mit funktionalen ER-Strategien. Am stärksten waren sie mit Katastrophisierung, Selbstbeschuldigung, Rumination, Neubewertung und Positiver Refokussierung, am schwächsten mit Akzeptanz und Refokussierung auf Planung. Schlussfolgerungen: Der deutsche CERQ ist hinsichtlich Skalenstruktur, Reliabilität und Zusammenhängen mit psychopathologischen Merkmalen vergleichbar mit der niederländischen Originalversion. Obwohl weitere Untersuchungen, insbesondere zur Konstruktvalidität, nötig sind, erscheint der CERQ geeignet für den Einsatz in der Emotionsregulationsforschung.


The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Psychometric evaluation of a German adaptation

Abstract.Background: The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski, Kraaij & Spinnhoven, 2001) consists of nine dimensions measuring cognitive emotion regulation. Objectives: A German adaptation was developed and its structure and reliability were tested. Furthermore its relationships with depressive symptoms and anxiety sensitivity were investigated. Method: The study was designed as a postal questionnaire survey. Of 3000 randomly contacted persons, 423 returned the questionnaire. The final sample comprised 414 participants. Anxiety sensitivity and depressive symptoms were measured with the ASI-3 and the PHQ-9. Results: The theoretical 9-factor-model could be satisfactorily replicated after reducing the number of items to three per factor. The correlation between the dysfunctional strategies and anxiety sensitivity and depressive symptoms exceeded those between the functional ones and psychopathology. The strongest associations were found with Catastrophizing, Self-Blame, Rumination, Positive Reappraisal and Positive Refocusing, the weakest appeared with Refocusing on Planning. Conclusion: The theoretical 9-factor-strucure could be confirmed for the German CERQ. It also proofed to have good reliability. Its correlation to anxiety sensitivity and depression are similar to those of the original. Although further investigation is needed, especially in terms of construct validity, the CERQ appears as an appropriate instrument for further research on emotion regulation.

Literatur

  • Abler, B. , Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire – Eine deutsche Version des ERQ von Gross & John. Diagnostica, 55 (3), 144–152. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Aldao, A. , Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, doi: 10.1016/j.brat. 2010.06.002. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aldao, A. , Nolen-Hoeksema, S. , Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30 (2), 217–237. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Backenstrass, M. , Pfeiffer, N. , Schwarz, T. , Catanzaro, S. , Mearns, J. (2008). Reliabilität und Validität der deutschsprachigen Version der Generalized Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation (NMR) Scale. Diagnostica, 54, 43–51. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (2007). On test and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 825–829. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berking, M. , Znoj, H. (2008). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27). Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 56 (2), 141–152. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Berking, M. , Meier, C. , Wupperman, P. (2010). Enhancing Emotion-Regulation Skills in Police Officers: Results of a Pilot Controlled Study. Behavior Therapy, 41 (3), 329–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, M. W. , Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • D’Acremont, M. , Van der Linden, M. (2007). How is impulsivity related to depression in adolescene? Evidence from a French validation of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Journal of Adolescene, 30, 271–282. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diekmann, A. (1995). Empirische Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ehring, T. , Tuschen-Caffier, B. , Berking, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the German version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. , Myrtek, M. , Pawlik, K. , Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment – Monitoring behavior in daily life settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23 (4), 206–213. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fisseni, H.-J. (2004). Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fresco, D. M. , Frankel, A. N. , Mennin, D. S. , Turk, C. L. , Heimberg R. G. (2002). Distinct and Overlapping Features of Rumination and Worry: The relationship of Cognitive Production to Negative Affective State. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26 (2), 179–188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garnefski, N. , Kraaij, V. , Spinhoven, Ph. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311–1327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garnefskii, N. , Spinnhoven, V. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire – development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1045–1053. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garnefski, N. , Kraaij, V. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionaire: Psychosomatic Features and Prospective Relationships with Depression and Anxiety in Adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23 (3), 141–149. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Glöckner-Rist, A. , Hoijtink, H. (2003). The best of both worlds: Factor analysis of dichotomous data using item respronse theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10 (4), 544–546. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gräfe, K. , Zipfel, S. , Herzog, W. , Löwe, B. (2004). Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem „Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)”. Ergebnisse der deutschen Validierungsstudie. Diagnostica, 50 (4), 171–181. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative rewiew. Review of General Psychology, 2 (3), 271–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. , John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rational and test for the number of factors in a factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179–185. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kemper, C. J. , Ziegler, M. , Taylor, S. (2009). Überprüfung der psychometrischen Qualität der deutschen Version des Angstsensitivitätsindex-3. Diagnostica, 55 (4), 223–233. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • König, D. , Jagsch, R. (2008). Emotionsregulations-Inventar ERI. Abgefragt 04.03.2010, von dk.akis.at/eri.pdf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kraaij, V. , Pruymboom, E. , Garnefski, N. (2002). Cognitive coping and depressive symptoms in the elderly: A longitudinal study. Aging & Mental Health, 6 (3), 275–281. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kroenke, K. , Spitzer, R. L. , Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med., 16 (9), 606–613. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus, Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnorm Psychology, 109, 504–511. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. , Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occuring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotions, 7, 561–570. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. , Wisco, B. E. , Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K. , Cheng, C. M. , Govorun, O. , Stwart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Eid, M. (2007). Richtlinien für die Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica, 53 (1), 1–2. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Selby, E. A. , Anestis, M. D. , Joiner, T. E. (2008). Understanding the relationship between emotional and behavioral dysregulation: Emotional cascades. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 593–611. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SPSS for Windows, Rel. 11.0.1. 2001. Chicago: SPSS Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stadelmaier, U. W. (2009). Deutsche Führungskräfte-Version des Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ-D-FK). In A. Glöckner-Rist (Hrsg.), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. ZIS Version 13.00. Bonn: GESIS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search and definition. In N. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Develpoment, 59 (2–3, Serials no. 240), 225–252. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar