Skip to main content
Original Communication

Attitudes Toward Gender Equality and Opposition to Muslim Full-Face Veils

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000181

Abstract. Often presented and perceived as incompatible with Western values, Muslim full-face veils meet strong opposition. Despite antiveil discourses often being based on concerns for gender equality, it is unclear whether those championing the equal treatment of men and women are also those who oppose full-face veils. Through two online studies conducted in French-speaking Switzerland, the present research aims to shed light on the complex relationship between attitudes toward gender equality and reactions to Muslim full-face veils. Study 1 showed that, as expected, people concerned about gender equality were less opposed to the public wearing of full-face veils because they supported Muslim minorities to a greater extent. Study 2 further revealed that people who believed that gender equality could be reached only by being enforced by all means opposed the wearing of full-face veils to a greater extent. Taken together, these results highlight both the complex underpinnings of attitudes toward the Muslim headscarf and the multidimensionality of positive attitudes toward gender equality.

References

  • Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 20–49. doi 10.1080/ 0141987042000280003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492. doi 10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17. doi 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Braun, M. (2008). Using egalitarian items to measure men’s and women’s family roles. Sex Roles, 59, 644–656. doi 10.1007/s11199-008-9468-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 309–328. doi 10.1146/annurev.soc. 012809.102651 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chakraborti, N., & Zempi, I. (2012). The veil under attack: Gendered dimensions of Islamophobic victimization. International Review of Victimology, 18, 269–284. doi 10.1177/0269758012446983 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • El-Geledi, S., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2012). Testing the impact of the Islamic veil on intergroup attitudes and host community acculturation orientations toward Arab Muslims. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 694–706. doi 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012. 03.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Values Study (2011). European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008) [Data file]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file version 3.0.0. doi 10.4232/1.11004 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Everett, J. A., Schellhaas, F. M., Earp, B. D., Ando, V., Memarzia, J., Parise, C. V., ... Hewstone, M. (2015). Covered in stigma? The impact of differing levels of Islamic head-covering on explicit and implicit biases toward Muslim women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 90–104. doi 10.1111/jasp.12278 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fasel, N., Green, E. G. T., & Sarrasin, O. (2013). Unveiling naturalization: A multilevel study on minority proportion, conservative ideologies and attitudes toward the Muslim veil. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 242–251. doi 10.1027/2151-2604/a000154 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandez, S. (2009). The crusade over the bodies of women. Patterns of Prejudice, 43, 269–286. doi 10.1080/00313220903109185 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gianettoni, L. (2011). Egalité des sexes et régulation institutionnelle de l’altérité racisée: Une analyse psychosociale des attitudes politiques envers les musulmans en Suisse [Gender equality and institutional regulation of racialized otherness: A social psychological analysis of political attitudes toward Muslims living in Switzerland]. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 37, 507– 524. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gianettoni, L., & Roux, P. (2010). Interconnecting race and gender relations: Racism, sexism and the attribution of sexism to the racialized other. Sex Roles, 62, 374–386. doi 10.1007/s11199-010-9755-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helbling, M. (2014). Opposing Muslims and the Muslim headscarf in Western Europe. European Sociological Review, 30, 242–257. doi 10.1093/esr/jct038 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fix indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1986). Validity of the sex-role egalitarianism scale: Discriminating egalitarianism from feminism. Sex Roles, 15, 207–214. doi 10.1007/BF00287485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krings, F., Tschan, F., & Bettex, S. (2007). Determinants of attitudes toward affirmative action in a Swiss sample. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 585–611. doi 10.1007/s10869-007-9042-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krivenko, E. Y. (2012). The Islamic veil and its discontents: How do they undermine gender equality. Religion & Human Rights, 7, 11–29. doi 10.1163/187103212X624229 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leckey, R. (2013). Face to face. Social Identities, 19, 743–758. doi 10.1080/13504630.2013.842672 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2009). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Neill, B., Gidengil, E., Côté, C., & Young, L. (2015). Freedom of religion, women’s agency and banning the face veil: The role of feminist beliefs in shaping women’s opinion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 1886–1901. doi 10.1080/01419870.2014.887744 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pedersen, A., & Hartley, L. K. (2012). Prejudice against Muslim Australians: The role of values, gender and consensus. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 239–255. doi 10.1002/casp.1110 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roux, P., Gianettoni, L., & Perrin, C. (2006). Féminisme et racisme: Une recherche exploratoire sur les fondements des divergences relatives au port du foulard [Feminism and racism: An exploratory study on the divergent attitudes toward the wearing of the headscarf]. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 25, 84–106. doi 10.3917/nqf.251.0084 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saroglou, V., Lamkaddem, B., Van Pachterbeke, M., & Buxant, C. (2009). Host society’s dislike of the Islamic veil: The role of subtle prejudice, values, and religion. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 419–428. doi 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.02.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sarrasin, O., Fasel, N., & Green, E. G. T. (2015). Gender differences in the acceptance of the Muslim headscarf. In K. FanikoF. Lorenzi-CioldiO. SarrasinE. MayorEds., Gender and social status: Perspectives from social psychology (pp. 159–174). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71, 113–124. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000078 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sarrasin, O., Green, E. G. T., Fasel, N., & Davidov, E. (2015). Does survey respondents’ immigrant background affect the measurement and prediction of immigration attitudes? An illustration in two steps. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 264–272. doi 10.1093/ijpor/edu015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schalk-Soekar, S. R. G., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2008). The concept of multiculturalism: A study among Dutch majority members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2152–2178. doi 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00385.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Swim, J., Aikin, K., Hall, W., & Hunter, B. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi 10.1037/0022-3514. 68.2.199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. P. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849. doi 10.1177/0146167295218007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van der Noll, J. (2014). Religious toleration of Muslims in the German public sphere. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 60–74. doi 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.01.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. S. (2012). The veil and Muslim women’s identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18, 521–541. doi 10.1177/1354067X12456713 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, W-h., & Lee, P-l. (2013). Decomposing gender beliefs: Cross-national differences in attitudes toward maternal employment and gender equality at home. Sociological Inquiry, 83, 591–621. doi 10.1111/soin.12013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zick, A., Wolf, C., Küpper, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (2008). The syndrome of group-focused enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross-sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 363–383. doi 10.1111/ j.1540-4560.2008.00566.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar