Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of different sample-calibrant composition in gamma-ray spectrometry for the assessment of the radiation dose rate in the luminescence dating of sediments

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the basic steps in luminescence dating is the determination of the annual radiation dose. Among the suitable determination methods in the case of sediment dating is HPGe gamma-ray spectrometry, primarily yielding the concentrations of K, Th and U via measurement of gamma-rays emitted by 40K and by 232Th and 235,238U and their decay products. These determinations involve both large-volume samples (with cylindrical or Marinelli geometry) and low-energy gamma-rays (down to the 210Pb 46.5 keV line). In view of this, calculations have been made in the present work in order to investigate possible inaccuracies related to gamma-ray attenuation, which may be different in samples and calibrants which have considerably different composition (elemental concentration and packing density). The calculations are based on the introduction of correction factors containing “effective solid angles” (proportional to the peak detection efficiencies), which are believed to give “correct” concentration results. It was found that, in some cases, significant errors could be committed when not performing proper corrections. Therefore, it is concluded that in practice this possible source of inaccuracy should be kept in mind, thus making it necessary to have a fair knowledge of the properties of the materials (samples and calibrants) under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. J. Aitken, Thermoluminescence Dating, Academic Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Hossain, F. De corte, D. Vandenberghe, P. Van den haute, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A490 (2002) 598.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Preparation and Certification of IAEA Gamma Spectrometry Reference Materials RGU-1, RGTh-1 and RGK-1, Report IAEA/RL/148, Vienna, 1987.

  4. L. Moens, J. De donder, LIN Xilei, F. De corte, A. De wispelaere, A. Simonits, J. Hoste, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 187 (1981) 451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Jovanovit, A. Dlabat, N. Mihaljevit, P. Vukotit, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 218 (1997) 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Jurado vargas, A. Fernandez timon, N. Cornejo diaz, D. Perez sanchez, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 57 (2002) 893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. R. Dixon, Nucleonics, 8 (1951) 68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. KAYZERO/SOLCOI Software for Using the k0-Standardization Method, V.5A, Ghent Univ. and DSM Research, 2003.

  9. PHOTKOEF (for Windows), AIC Software, 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Corte, F., Vandenberghe, D., Hossain, S.M. et al. The effect of different sample-calibrant composition in gamma-ray spectrometry for the assessment of the radiation dose rate in the luminescence dating of sediments. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 262, 261–267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JRNC.0000040884.16458.de

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JRNC.0000040884.16458.de

Keywords

Navigation