Skip to main content
Log in

Soft Systems Methodology: Other Voices

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This issue of Systemic Practice and Action Research, celebrating the work of Peter Checkland, in the particular nature and development of soft systems methodology (SSM), would not have happened unless the work was seen by others as being important. No significant contribution to thinking happens without a secondary literature developing. Not surprisingly, many commentaries have accompanied the ongoing development of SSM. Some of these are insightful, some full of errors, and some include both insight and absurdity. Checkland (1999, p. A42) opines, in the recently published 30-year retrospective, that "SSM has been ill-served by its commentators." Scrutiny of the secondary literature on SSM provides support for this view and also identifies some general characteristics and trends that are important to the development of SSM and, incidentally, reinforces some existing conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. (1989). Development of Business Information Systems, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. (1984). Metaphor and Systemic Praxis, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. J. (1986). Towards a plurality of soft systems methodology. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E. (1989). An overview of information systems development methodologies. In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., and Fitzgerald, G. (1988). Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., and Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 2nd ed., McGraw—Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1990). Multiview: An Exploration in Information Systems Development, Alfred Waller, Henley-on-Thames.

  • Avison, D. E., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1991). Information systems development research: An exploration of ideas in practice. Comput. J. 34(2), 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., Fitzgerald, G., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1988). Information systems development: A toolkit is not enough. Comput. J. 31(4), 379–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., Golder, P. A., and Shah, H. U. (1992). Towards an SSM toolkit: Rich picture diagramming. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 1(6), 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballé, M. (1994). Managing with Systems Thinking: Making Dynamics Work for You in Business Decision Making, McGraw—Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnden, A., Smith, R., and Watson, R. B. (1995). A framework for analysing SSM-based studies. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B. R., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York, pp. 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeby, R. B. (1993). On the incommensurability of hard and soft systems approaches to information system provision. In Stowell, F. A., West, D., and Howell, J. G. (eds.), Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues, Plenum, New York, pp. 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. (1992). Soft systems methodology. Manage. Account. July/August, 22.

  • Benyon, D. (1990). Information and Data Modelling, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D. (1995). Information and Data Modelling, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D., and Skidmore, S. (1987). Towards a toolkit for the systems analyst. Comput. J. 30(1), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggam, J., and Hogarth, A. (1996). Soft systems methodology (SSM): Fundamental issues. In Jayaratna, N., and Fitzgerald, B. (eds.), Lessons Learned from the Use of Methodologies, British Computer Society, Information Systems Methodologies Specialist Interest Group, pp. 249–255.

  • Brown, A. D. (1992). Grounding soft systems research. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 1(6), 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. (1983). 'systems Thinking, Systems Practice': A review. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri, S. A. (1994). ‘soft’ systems thinking: A pre-condition for organizational learning. Hum. Syst. Manage. 13, 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCTA (1993). Applying Soft Systems Methodology to an SSADM Feasibility Study, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1984). Systems theory and information systems. In Bemelmans, T. M. A. (ed.), Beyond Productivity: Information System Development for Organizational Effectiveness, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1988). Information systems and systems thinking: Time to unite? Int. J. Inform. Manage. 8(4), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Including a 30 Year Retrospective, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., and Holwell, S. E. (1993). Information management and organizational processes: An approach through soft systems methodology. J. Inform. Syst. 3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, L. C-Y., and Holden, T. (1993). Information requirements. In Stowell, F. A., West, D., and Howell, J. G. (eds.), Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues, Plenum, New York, pp. 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, C., and Stuteley, G. (1995). Information Systems—Strategy to Design, Chapman Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, M. R. (1995). Information Systems for Business Management, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, M., Beeby, R., and Gammack, J. (1996). Constructing Systems and Information: A Process View, McGraw—Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, G. (1995). Business Information Systems: Analysis, Design and Practice, 2nd ed., Addison—Wesley, Wokingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbom, B., and Mathiassen, L. (1993). Computers in Context: The Philosophy and Practice of Systems Design, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. J. (1992). On the reality of systems. Syst. Pract. 5(6), 601–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. J., and Ledington, P. (1991). Information in Action, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. J., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1989). Information system development: Theoretical framework. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, E., Clare, P., and Coe, I. (1992). Structured Systems Analysis and Design Method: Application and Context, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. G., and Wood, R. G. (1990). Soft Systems and Systems Enginering: Across the Great Divide, Bristol Polytechnic, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. G., and Wood, R. G. (1991). Systems thinking, systems practice: Dangerous liaisons. Systemist 13(1), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. G., Wood, J. R. G., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1993). Soft systems and systems engineering: On the use of conceptual models in information system development. J. Inform. Syst. 3, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, D. (1995). Surviving seeing medusa. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B. R., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York, pp. 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. K. (1995). Critical considerations in the development of systems thinking and practice. Syst. Pract. 8(2), 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairtlough, G. (1982). A note on the use of the term ‘weltanschauung’ (W) in Checkland's “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice.” J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J-K. (1993). Conceptual modelling and DBS/KBS Design. In Stowell, F. A., West, D., and Howell, J. G. (eds.), Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues, Plenum, New York, pp. 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1991). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners. In Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, P. (1989). The Development and Dissemination of Soft Systems Methodology, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. (1995). The will to systems. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B. R., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammack, J. (1995). Modelling subjective requirements objectively. In Stowell, F. (ed.), Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw—Hill, London, pp. 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, A., Connell, C., Philp, I., and Bray, J. (1994). Stakeholder participation approach and information system development: An action research case study, Discussion Paper No. 94-83, Department of Accounting & Management Science, University of Southampton, Southampton.

  • Gregory, F. H. (1993a). Cause, effect, efficiency, and soft systems models. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 44(4), 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, F. H. (1993b). Logic and meaning in conceptual models: Implications for information system design. Systemist 15(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, F. H. (1993c). Soft systems methodology to information systems: A Wittgensteinian approach. J. Inform. Syst. 3, 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, M. (1994). Information Systems in Business, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengerer, O. (1995). Strategic Considerations on Soft Systems Methodology, Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. (1985). Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., and Schafer, G. (1988). Requirements analysis: A new look at an old topic. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., and Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchins, D. K. (1991). A unified systems hypothesis. In Jackson, M. C., Mansell, G. J., Flood, R. L., Blackham, R. B., and Probert, S. V. E. (eds.), Systems Thinking in Europe, Plenum, New York, pp. 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, R. (1991). A Quantitative Investigation of SSM Modelling Techniques, Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holwell, S. E. (1996). SSM: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of SSM Research Discussion Workshop, Preston, 15 March.

  • Holwell, S. E. (1997). Soft Systems Methodology and Its Role in Information Systems, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. (1995). Critical thinking in the information systems undergraduate curriculum. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B. R., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York, pp. 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of ‘soft’ systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). The origins and nature of critical systems thinking. Syst. Pract. 4(2), 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1993). Social theory and operational research practice. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 44(6), 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N. (1992). Should we link SSM with information systems. Systemist 14(3), 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N. (1994). Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, McGraw—Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N., and D'Arcy, B. D. (1993). Desirability and feasibility of linking ‘soft’ systems methodology (SSM) with structured methodologies. In Stowell, F. A., West, D., and Howell, J. G. (eds.), Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues, Plenum, New York, pp. 637–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1992). SSM and information systems. Systemist 14(3), 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. K. (1991). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications (second edition). Book review. Syst. Pract. 4(5), 528–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. C. (1993). With a little help from our friends: How third generation system dynamics and the issue structuring techniques of ‘soft’ OR can learn from each other, CUBS Working Paper No. ITM/93/CDL2, Information Technology Division, City University Management School, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledington, P. (1989). An issue-based analysis of the development of soft systems methodology. In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledington, P., and Donaldson, J. (1997). Soft OR and management practice: A study of the adoption and use of soft systems methodology. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 48(3), 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehaney, B., Martin, S., and Clarke, S. (1997). A review of problem structuring methodologies. Systemist 19(1), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. J. (1992). Rich picture building in the soft systems methodology. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 1(5), 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. J. (1994). Information-Systems Development, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1987a). Different perspectives on information systems: Problems and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. 19(1), 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1987b). A taxonomic perspective of information systems development. In Boland, R. J., and Hirschheim, R. A. (eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1988). Stakeholders, information system failures & soft systems methodology: An assessment. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1992). Information systems and critical theory. In Alvesson, M., and Willmot, H. (eds.), Critical Management Studies, Sage, London, pp. 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, G. (1989). Dualism in social theory and systems practice. In Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.), Operations Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum, New York, pp. 171–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D., and Willcocks, L. (1994). Systems Analysis, Systems Design, Alfred Waller, Henley-on-Thames.

  • Mathiassen, L., Munk-Madsen, A., Nielsen, P. A., and Stage, J. (1991). Soft systems in software design. In Jackson, M. C., Mansell, G. J., Flood, R. L., Blackham, R. B., and Probert, S. V. E. (eds.), Systems Thinking in Europe, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears-Young, B. (1995). Logistics awareness. In Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B. R., and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York, pp. 577–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merali, Y. (1992). Analytic data flow diagrams: An alternative to physicalism. Systemist 14(3), 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. K. (1988). Combining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ systems practice: Grafting or embedding? J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. K. (1992). Combining ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ systems practice: Grafting and embedding revisited. Systemist 14(2), 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1984). Subjectivism and soft systems methodology—A critique. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 11, 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1988). Comparing conceptual models and data flow diagrams. Comput. J. 31(4), 376–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1992). Questions and suggestions in using soft systems methodology. Systemist 14(2), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and Taylor, S. (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 43(4), 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyes, P. (1993). Using pictures to plan and manage change. Systemist 15(3), 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, J. S. (1993). Total Quality Management, 2nd ed., Butterworth Heinemann.

  • Pidd, M. (1996). Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, R. (1992). Linking SSM and IS development. Systemist 14(3), 128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, S. K. (1991). A Critical Study of the National Computing Centre's Systems Analysis and Design Methodology and Soft Systems Methodology, Unpublished M. Phil thesis, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, S. K. (1999). A critical analysis of the practical relationship between soft systems methodology, Husserlian phenomenology and systems development. In Wood-Harper, A. T., Jayaratna, N., and Wood, J. R. G. (eds.), Methodologies for Developing and Managing Emerging Technology Based Information Systems, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, H. G. (1989). North Labrador and the Torngat Co-Op: An Exploration of Checkland's Soft Systems Methodology Through Its Application to Fisheries Development, Unpublished M.A. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. (1995). Knowing as intervention: Reflections on the application of systems ideas. Syst. Pract. 8(2), 137–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1989). Diverse unity: The principles and prospects for problem structuring methods. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B. (1989). Be prepared—With soft analysis. OR Insight 2(2), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, A., and Mingers, J. (1996). A framework for linking soft systems methodology (SSM) and Jackson System Development (JSD). Inform. Syst. J. 6(2), 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (1992). A contribution towards the debate on linking SSM to IS. Systemist 14(3), 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, G. (1988). Functional Analysis of Office Requirements: A Multiperspective Approach, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, S. (1994). Introducing Systems Analysis, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F. (1993). Hermeneutics and organisational inquiry. Systemist 15(2), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F. (1995a). Empowering the client: The relevance of SSM and interpretivism to Client-Led Design. In Stowell, F. (ed.), Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw—Hill, London, pp. 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F. (ed.) (1995b). Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw—Hill Information Systems, Management and Strategy, McGraw—Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F., and West, D. (1994). Client-Led Design: A Systemic Approach to Information Systems Definition, McGraw—Hill, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Hum. Relat. 45(7), 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, D. J., and Tudor, I. J. (1995). Systems Analysis and Design: A Comparison of Structured Methods, NCC Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visala, S. (1991). Broadening the empirical framework of information systems research. In Nissen, H., Klein, H. K., and Hirschheim, R. A. (eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. (1991). A new course in systems analysis and design. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 11(3), 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H., Wood-Harper, T., and Wood, B. (1995). Interpreting methodology under erasure: Between theory and practice. Syst. Pract. 8(4), 441–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., and Smith, R. (1988). Applications of the Lancaster soft systems methodology in Australia. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1989). OR as a problem situation: From soft systems methodology to critical systems. In Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.), Operations Research and the Social Sciences, Plenum, New York, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. R. G. (1992). Linking soft systems methodology and information systems. Systemist 14(3), 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. R. G., and Doyle, K. G. (1989). Doing the right thing right: An exploration between soft systems methodology and Jackson System Development. Proceedings of 33rd Annual Meeting of ISGR Conference, Program on Information Systems, Edinburgh, 2—7 July.

  • Wood-Harper, A. T., and Fitzgerald, G. (1982). A taxonomy of current approaches to systems analysis. Comput. J. 25(1), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolles, M. I. (1994). Generic metamodelling. Systemist 16(4), 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holwell, S. Soft Systems Methodology: Other Voices. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 773–797 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026479529130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026479529130

Navigation