Skip to main content
Log in

Conditional Probability Meets Update Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic update of information states is a new paradigm in logicalsemantics. But such updates are also a traditional hallmark ofprobabilistic reasoning. This note brings the two perspectives togetherin an update mechanism for probabilities which modifies state spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltag, A., Moss, L., and Solecki, S., 1998, “The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions,” pp. 43–56 in Proceedings TARK 1998, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltag, A., Moss, L., and Solecki, S., 2002, Updated version of the preceding, Department of Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, and Department of Computing, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R. and Halpern, J., 1994, “Reasoning about knowledge and probability,” Journal of the ACM 41, 340–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., and Vardi, M., 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I., 1965, The Estimation of Probabilities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenwald, P. and Halpern, J., 2003, “Updating probabilities,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, to appear.

  • Hirshleifer, J. and Riley, J.G., 1992, The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J., Snell, J., and Thompson, G., 1974, Introduction to Finite Mathematics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooi, B., 1999, “The Monty Hall dilemma,” Master's Thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Groningen.

  • Kooi, B., 2001, “Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic,” Department of Computer Science, University of Groningen.

  • van Benthem, J., 2001, “Games in dynamic epistemic logic,” in Bulletin of Economic Research 53, 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., 2002, “Conditional probability is update logic,” Lecture Note, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University.

  • van Benthem, J., 2003, “One is a lonely number,” Report PP-2003-07, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.

  • van Ditmarsch, H., 2000, “Knowledge games,” Dissertation DS-2000-06, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.

  • van Rooy, R., 2002, “Utility, informativity, and protocols,” in Proceedings Logic and the Foundations of the Theory of Games and Decisions, LOFT-5, Torino, Italy, G. Bonanno et al., eds.

  • van Rooy, R., 2003, “Quality and quantity of information exchange,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 423–451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Benthem, J. Conditional Probability Meets Update Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 409–421 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025002917675

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025002917675

Navigation