Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing the Financial Risk of Bed-Day and DRG Based Pricing Types Using Parametric and Simulation Methods

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent of random financial risk involved in the Finnish bed-day and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) based hospital pricing systems were estimated and compared using parametric and simulation methods. DRG based payment schemes were found to provide significantly better protection against financial risk for municipalities, but municipality's size was the main determinant of financial risk. Small municipalities should use longer contracts between hospitals or form bigger purchaser-organisations for risk pooling. In addition, the current risk management system proved to be ineffective in decreasing the random variation in total costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Arrow, Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care, American Economic Review 53 (1963) 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Schokkaert, G. Dhaene and C. Voorde, Risk adjustment and the trade-off between efficiency and risk selection: An application of the theory of fair compensation, Health Economics 7 (1998) 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.M. van Barneveld, L.M. Lamers, R.C.J.A. van Vilet and W.P.M.M. van de Ven, Risk sharing as a supplement to imperfect capitation a tradeoff between selection and efficiency, Journal of Health Economics 20 (2001) 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.F. Coulam and G.L. Gaumer, Medicare's prospective payment system: A critical appraisal, Health Care Financing Review, Annual supplement (1991) 45–77.

  5. C. Charpentier and L.A. SamuelsonEffekter av en Sjukvårdsreform (Impacts of a Health Care Reform) (Nerenius & Santérus Förlag, Sollentuna, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Forsberg, R. Axelsson and B. Arnetz, Financial incentives in health care. The Impact of performance-based reimbursement, Health Policy 58 (2001) 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Hagen, T. Iverse and J. Magnussen, Sykehusenes effektivitetsutvikling 1992–1999: Hvilke effekter ga Innsatsstyrt finansiering? (The effect of activity based financing on hospital efficiency) (HERO Skriftserie 5, Oslo, 2001).

  8. E. Kjerstad, Prospective Funding of Somatic Hospitals in Norway – Incentives for Higher Production? (Foundation for Research in Economic and Business Administration, Bergen, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Bachman and G. Bevan, Determining the size of a total purchasing site to manage the financial risks of rare costly referrals: Computer simulation model, BMJ 313 (1996) 1054–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Crumb, J. Cubbon, M. Drummond, R. Hawkes and M. Marchment, Fundholding in general practise and financial risk, BMJ 303 (1991) 1582–1584.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Gpenski and B. Langland-Orban, The financial risk to hospitals inherent in DRG, per diem, and capitation reimbursement methodologies, Journal of Health Care Management 43 (1998) 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Häkkinen, M. Linna and M. Salonen, Korvausmenettelyn ja kuntakoon vaikutus erikoissairaanhoidon taloudelliseen riskiin (The effect of hospital pricing and size of municipality on the financial risk in specialised care), Suomen Lääkärilehti 25 (1994) 2454–2458.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Siegel, K. Jones, E. Laska, M. Meisner and S. Lin, A risk-based prospective payment system that integrates patient, hospital and national costs, Journal of Health Economics 11 (1992) 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Barnum, J. Kutzin and H. Saxenian, Incentives and provider payment methods, International Journal of Health Planning and Management 10 (1995) 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Shavell, Sharing risks of deferred payment, Journal of Political Economy 84 (1976) 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Hornbrook, Economic incentives and control, Journal of Medical Systems 5 (1981) 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Ellis and T. McGuire, Provider behaviour under prospective reimbursement, cost sharing and supply, Journal of Health Economics 5 (1986) 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Panjer, Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions, ASTIN Bulletin 12 (1981) 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Panjer and S. Wang, On the stability of recursive formulas, ASTIN Bulletin 23 (1993) 227–258.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.-H. Waldmann, Modified recursions for a class of compound distributions, ASTIN Bulletin 26 (1996) 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Mustonen, SURVO – An Intergrated Environment for Statistical Computing and Related Areas (Survo Systems, Helsinki, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Mustonen, Programming SURVO, in: C. SURVO Contributions, Vol. 3 (Department of Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Ellis and T. McGuire, Insurance principles and the design of prospective payment systems, Journal of Health Economics 7 (1988) 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Keeler, G. Carter and S. Trude, Insurance aspects of DRG outlier payments, Journal of Health Economics 7 (1988) 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B.H. Gilman, Hospital response to DRG refinements: The impact of multiple reimbursement incentives on inpatient length of stay, Health Economics 9 (2000) 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Mikkola, I. Keskimäki and U. Häkkinen, DRG related prices applied in a public health care system – can Finland learn form Norway or Sweden, Health Policy 59 (2002) 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikkola, H., Sund, R., Linna, M. et al. Comparing the Financial Risk of Bed-Day and DRG Based Pricing Types Using Parametric and Simulation Methods. Health Care Management Science 6, 67–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023341000858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023341000858

Keywords

Navigation