Skip to main content
Log in

The Spanish version of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AETM)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to obtain a conceptually equivalent Spanish version of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AETM), and to test its feasibility, reliability and preliminary construct validity. The methodology used for adaptation was forward-back translation, including two focus groups with adolescents and a panel of experts. Reliability and validity were assessed in healthy convenience samples from school settings (n = 417). Three different illness groups (n = 67) were used to examine differences in health status between healthy, acutely ill, chronically ill and mentally ill adolescents. Preliminary construct validity was examined by comparing mean scores for each of the subdomains to determine if they differed in predicted ways according to age, gender and illness group. The majority of items (154 out of 203) were conceptually equivalent to the original version. Some items (46) had to be modified to increase clarity and/or to adapt them for use in Spain and 3 items were considered not applicable. Single construct subdomains achieved α coefficients between 0.65 and 0.92, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between 0.57 and 0.93. The mentally ill group presented the worst scores in most domains. The Spanish CHIP-AE is acceptable for Spanish adolescents and shows adequate metric characteristics, which are similar to those reported in the US version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality of life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5(4): 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garc?á E, González MP, Saiz PA, Bobes J. The Spanish version of the AUQUEI questionnaire (child pictured selfreport). 5th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 596.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tauler E, Vilagut G, Grau G, et al. The Spanish version of the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ): Metric characteristics and equivalence with the original version. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Badia X, Garc?á-Hernández G, Cobos N, L ópez-David C, Nocea G, Roset M. Validity of the Spanish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire for evaluating quality of life in asthmatic children. Med Clin (Barc) 2001; 116: 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Climent JM, Reig A, Sanchez J, Roda C. Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine 1995; 20: 2006–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Starfield B. Child health status and outcome of care: A commentary on measuring the impact of medical care in children. J Chron Dis 1987; 40(S): 109S–115S.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen M, Donald CA, Ware Jr JE, Brook RH. Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Children in the Health Insurance Study. Santa M ónica, California: Rand, R-2313 HEW, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newacheck P. Adolescents with special needs: Prevalence, severity, and access to health services. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 872–884.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 913–923.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi-Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186–3191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1569–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Abel T, et al. Quality of life in children and adolescents: A European public health perspective. Soc Prev Med 2001; 46: 294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Starfield B, Bergner M, Ensminger M, et al. Adolescent health status measurement: Development of the Child Health and Illness Profile. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starfield B, Riley A, Green B, et al. The Child Health and Illness Profile. A population-based measure of health. Med Care 1995; 33: 553–566.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Starfield B. Measurement of outcome: A proposed scheme. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1974; 52: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boyle MH, Offord DR, Hofmann HGM, et al. Ontario child health study. I. Methodology. Arch Gen Paychiatry 1987; 44: 826–831.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Nerry JW (eds), Field Methods in Cross-cultural Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986; 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 349–351.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alonso J, Ant ó JM, Moreno C. Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: Translation and preliminary validity. Am J Public Health 1990; 80: 704–708.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chinn S, Burney P. On measuring repeatability of data from self-administered questionnaires. Int J Epidemiol 1987; 16: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mc Horney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SPSS User's Manual. Base 8.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 1998.

  25. Álvarez-Dardet C, Alonso J, Domingo A, Regidor E. La medici ón de la clase social en ciencias de la salud. Informe de un grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Espan Õla de Epidemiología. Barcelona: Sociedad Espan Õla de Epidemiología, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric consideration in evaluating quality of life measures. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Starfield B, Forrest Ch, Ryan SA, et al. Health status of well vs ill adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150: 1249–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Payer L. Medicine and Culture: Varieties of Treatment in the United States, England, West Germany and France. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riley A, Green B, Forrest C, Starfield B, Kang M, Ensminger M. A taxonomy of adolescent health. Development of the adolescent health profile. Med Care 1998; 36: 1228–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riley A, Forrest C, Starfield B, Green B, Kang M, Ensminger M. Reliability and validity of the adolescent health profile-type. Med Care 1998; 36: 1237–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riley A, Harris S, Ensminger M, et al. Behaviour and injury in urban and rural adolescents. Injury Prevention 1996; 2: 266–273.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Forrest CB, Tambor E, Riley AW, Ensminger ME, Starfield B. The health profile of incarcerated male youths. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 286–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajmil, L., Serra-Sutton, V., Alonso, J. et al. The Spanish version of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AETM). Qual Life Res 12, 303–313 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023220912211

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023220912211

Navigation