Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological Challenges in Studying Recurrence of Low Back Pain

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recurrences of low back pain (LBP) have been shown to be both frequent and costly, with reported recurrence rates ranging from 5 to 82%. Numerous methodological approaches have been developed to identify recurrence but there has been no standardized definition of LBP recurrence or required follow-up time. The objective of this study was to compare the methodological approaches used to analyze LBP recurrence in seminal contributions and to describe the differences in definitions of LBP recurrence and follow-up structure. Twelve seminal articles were identified for review during which four types of LBP recurrence definition and two types of follow-up structure were recognized. Definitional and follow-up differences considerably contributed to variations in computed recurrence rates due either to measurement or other methodological shortcomings, such as loss to follow-up and sick person effect. The results suggest that there is a need to develop a standardized definition of LBP recurrence and a standardized approach to follow-up to allow direct comparisons of published research findings. The use of alternative definitions is also likely to impact analyses of risk factors contributing to LBP recurrence and direct and indirect costs associated with treating LBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Nierenberg A, DeCecco L. Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: A focus on treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nierenberg A, Alpert J. Depressive breakthrough. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000; 23(4): 731–742.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drury V, Birchwood M, Cochrane R, Macmillan F. Cognitive therapy and recovery from acute psychosis. 2. Impact on recovery time. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 602–607.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haddock G, Tarrier N, Morrison A, Hopkins R, Drake R, Lewis S. A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of individual inpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy in early psychosis. Soc Psychiarty Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 254–258.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuipers E, Fowler D, Garety P, Chisholm D, Freeman D, Dunn G, Bebbington P, Hadley C. London-East Anglia randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis. III. Follow-up and economic evaluation at 18 months. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 173: 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Musil C, Morris D, Haug M, Warner C, Whelan A. Recurrent symptoms: Well-being and management. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52(11): 1729–1740.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tol J, Verheyen C, Van Dijk C. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior impingement in the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83-B: 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mohr J, Thompson J, Lazar R, Levin B. A comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(20): 1444–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gong T, Wang X. Long-term follow-up study of 72 patients with transient ischemic attacks. Chin Med J 2001; 114(12): 1270–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute low back pain in industry. Acta Orthop Scand 1977; S170: 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biering-Sorensen F. A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. Scand J Rehab Med 1983; 15: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacDonald M, Sorock G, Volinn E, Hashemi L, Clancy E, Webster B. A descriptive study of recurrent low back pain claims. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39(1): 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spengler D, Bigos S, Martin N, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. Back injuries: A retrospective study. Spine 1986; 11: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Von Korff M, Deyo R, Cherkin D, Barlow W. Back pain in primary care: Outcomes at 1 year. Spine 1993; 18(7): 855–862.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelsey J, White A. Epidemiology and impact of low back pain. Spine 1980; 5: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andersson G. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999; 354: 581–585.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hornbrook M, Hurtado A, Johnson R. Health care episodes: Definition, measurement, and use. Med Care Rev 1985; 42: 163–218.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roos N, Roos L, Mossey J, Havens B. Using administrative data to predict important health outcomes: Entry to hospital, nursing home and death. Med Care 1988; 26: 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schulman K, Yabroff K, Kong J, Gold K, Rubenstein L, Epstein AJ, Glick H. A claims data approach to defining an episode of care. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10(5): 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wennberg J, Roos N, Sola L, Schori A, Jaffe R. Use of calims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes: Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. JAMA 1987; 257(7): 933–936.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lestina D, Miller T, Smith G. Creating injury episodes using medical claims data. J Trauma 1998; 45(3): 565–569.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abenhaim L, Suissa S, Rossignol M. Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over 3-year follow-up. Br J Ind Med 1988; 45: 829–833.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garcy P, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling spinal disorders: Tertiary prevention efficiacy of functional restoration treatment. Spine 1996; 21(8): 952–959.

    Google Scholar 

  24. PubMed. National Library of Medicine, www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov/entrez

  25. Science Citation Index. ISI, http://www-isinet-com/isi/products/citation/scie/index-html

  26. Shekelle P, Markovich M, Louie R. An epidemiologic study of episodes of back pain care. Spine 1995; 20(15): 1668–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Troup J, Martin J, Lloyd D. Back pain in industry: A prospective study. Spine 1981; 6(1): 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. The evolution of compensated occupational spinal injuries: A three-year follow-up study. Spine 1992; 17(9): 1043–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Watson P, Main C, Waddell G, Gales T, Purcell-Jones G. Medically certified work loss, recurrence and costs of wage compensation for back Pain: A follow-up study of the working population of jersey. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Carey T, Mills-Garrett J, Jackman A, Hadler N. Recurrence and care seeking after acute back pain: Results of a long-term follow-up study. Med Care 1999; 37(2): 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Von Korff M. Studying the natural history of back pain. Spine 1994; 19(18S): 2041S-2046S.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGorry R, Webster B, Snook S, Hsiang S. The relationship between pain intensity, disability, and the episodic nature of chronic and recurrent low back pain. Spine 2000; 25(7): 834–841.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fransen M, Woodward M, Norton R, Coggan C, Dawe M, Sheridan N. Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain. Spine 2002; 27(1): 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers' compensation data. Am J Ind Med 1999; 35(6): 604–618.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dasinger L, Krause N, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L. Duration of work disability after low back injury: A comparison of administrative and self-reported outcomes. Am J Ind Med 1999; 35(6): 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liang K, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear model. Biometrika 1986; 1986: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koch G, Landis J, Freeman J, Lehnen R. A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen P, Wong E, Dominik R, Steiner M. A transitional model of barrier methods compliance with unbalanced loss to follow-up. Stat Med 2000; 19: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wen C, Tsai S, Gibson R. Anatomy of the healthy worker effect: A critical review. J Occup Med 1983; 25: 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sterling T, Weinkam J. Extent, persistence, and constancy of the healthy person effect by all and selected causes of death. J Occup Med 1986; 28: 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Monson R. Observations on the healthy worker effect. J Occup Med 1986; 28: 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McMichael A. Standardized mortality ratios and the “healthy worker effect”: Scratching beneath the surface. J Occup Med 1976; 18: 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sterling T, Weinkam J, Weinkam J. The sick person effect. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43(2): 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nachemson A, Bigos S. The low back. In: Cruess J, Rennie W, eds. Adult orthopedics. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1984, pp. 843–937.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liberty Mutual Center for Disability Research, Hopkinton, Massachusetts

    Radoslaw Wasiak, Glenn S. Pransky & Barbara S. Webster

  2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

    Glenn S. Pransky

Authors
  1. Radoslaw Wasiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Glenn S. Pransky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara S. Webster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wasiak, R., Pransky, G.S. & Webster, B.S. Methodological Challenges in Studying Recurrence of Low Back Pain. J Occup Rehabil 13, 21–31 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021893706683

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021893706683

Search

Navigation