Skip to main content
Log in

Going Quasi: The Premature Disclosure Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a randomized clinical trial investigating a stress management program for women with breast cancer, which inadvertently turned quasi-experimental. Due to logistical considerations, group assignment was disclosed to participants (n = 63) prior to baseline assessment. Analyses of baseline measures unexpectedly revealed statistically significant differences between groups on psychological functioning. We suggest that what appears to be failed randomization may in fact point toward an important phenomenon which we have termed premature disclosure effect (PDE). A hierarchical regression model, developed to help explain the PDE, accounted for 47% of the variance. The findings indicate the importance of considering participant belief, preferences, and attributes when designing research protocols and interventions. Potential implications of PDE for clinical research in behavioral medicine are discussed and specific statistical methodologies suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unveiling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., and Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4: 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., and Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions, Irvington, New York.

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Morrow, G. R., Fetting, J., Penman, D., Piastesky, S., Schmale, A. M., Henrichs, M., and Carnicke, C. L. M. (1983). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA 249: 751–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiClemente, R. J., and Temoshok, L. (1985). Psychological adjustments to having cutaneous malignant melanoma as a predictor of follow-up clinical status. Psychosom. Med. 47: 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1971). Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrics 58: 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenbergs, I., Gordon, W., Hibbard, M., Levine, L., Wolf, C., and Diller, L. (1982). Psychosocial aspects of living with cancer: A review of the literature. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 11: 303–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1987). Psychobiological factors predicting the course of breast cancer. J. Person. 55: 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Three methods of analyzing limited time series (N of 1) data. Behav. Assess. 5: 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S., Morris, T., and Pettingale, K. W. (1979). Psychological response to breast cancer: Effect on outcome. Lancet 2: 785–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S., and Silberfarb, P. M. (1982). Psychological concomitants of cancer: Current state of research. Psychol. Med. 12: 563–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L. M. (1989). Random sampling, randomization, and equivalence of contrasted groups in psychotherapy outcome research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I., and Weixel, L. J. (1998). Double-blind versus deceptive administration of a placebo. Biomed. Ther. XVI(3): 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline J.P., and Schwartz, G. E. (1995). Repression, emotional disclosure, and health: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical considerations. In Pennebaker, J.W. (ed.), Emotion, Disclosure and Health, pp. 177–193.

  • McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., and Droppleman L. F. (1981). Profile of Mood States (POMS), 2nd Ed. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego,CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., and Melvin, M. M. (1995). Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol. 14(2): 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettingale, K.W., Morris, T., Greer, S., and Haybittle, J. (1985). Mental attitudes to cancer: An additional prognostic factor. Lancet I: 750.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1996). SAS Language and Procedures, Version 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E. (1984). Psychobiology and health: A new synthesis. In Hammonds, B. L., and Scheirer, C. J. (eds.), Psychology and Health: Master Lecture Series, 3, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 145–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. K., and Shapiro, E. (1997). The Powerful Placebo: From Ancient Priest to Modern Physician, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. H. (1992). Shapiro Control Inventory (SCI), Behaviordyne, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.C., and Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shauna L. Shapiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, S.L., Figueredo, A.J., Caspi, O. et al. Going Quasi: The Premature Disclosure Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Behav Med 25, 605–621 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020693417427

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020693417427

Navigation