Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructivism has become an important referent for research and practice in science education. A variety of more or less divergent forms of constructivism have developed: discussion between these is occasionally heated. Six such forms are briefly described in order to provide an overview of the field of constructivist theory. A scheme for characterising constructivist writing on the basis of its relative emphasis on (a) personal versus social construction of knowledge and (b) objectivist versus relativist views of the nature of science is suggested. Issues of theory creation and reflexivity, central to constructivist practice, are discussed. It is suggested that debate about the "best" form of constructivism is counterproductive. A more powerful approach to epistemology is that described by Feyerabend, the holding in dialectical tension of a variety of incompatible perspectives:

The following essay is written in the conviction that anarchism, while perhaps not the most attractive political philosophy, is certainly excellent medicine for epistemology, and for the philosophy of science (Feyerabend, 1975, 17, italics in original).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bauersfeld, H.: 1988, ‘Interaction, construction and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education’, in Grouws, Cooney & Jones (eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, A.: 1993, ‘The construction of knowledge: A radical constructivist view’, in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, (Ch 3), American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W.: 1993, ‘Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science’, in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, (Ch 4), American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V.: 1986, ‘A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science’, Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. & Easley, J.: 1978, ‘Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students’, Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P.: 1992, ‘The nature of mathematics: Towards a social constructivist account’, Science & Education, 1, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P.: 1993, ‘Constructivism, the psychology of learning and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues’, Science & Education, 2, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K.: 1975, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosnot, C.T.: 1993, ‘Rethinking science education: A defence of Piagetian constructivism’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9): 1189–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J.: 1995, ‘From construction in context to reconstruction in education’, in L.P. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E.: 1989, ‘Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching’, Synthese. 80, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E.: 1993, ‘Questions and answers about radical constructivism, in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, (Ch 2), American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R.: 1993, ‘The many forms of constructivism’, Editorial, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, (2nd ed.), J.J. Shapiro (trans.), Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1978, Legitimation Crisis, T. McCarthy (trans.), Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A.: 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin, M.: 1992, ‘Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin, M.: 1993, ‘Some further questions for Piagetian constructivists: A reply to Fosnot’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, A.L. & West, L.H.T.: 1986, ‘Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework’, Science Education, 70(5), 583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J.: 1994, ‘The rise and fall of constructivism’, Studies in Science Education, 23, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J.: 1987, ‘Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science’, Studies in Science Education, 14, 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F.: 1991, Research and Reflexivity, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F.: 1995, ‘From universing to conversing: An ecological constructionist approach to learning and multiple description’, in L.P. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.C.S.: 1994a, Private communication.

  • Taylor, P.C.S.: 1994b, ‘Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom’, National Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University, Perth, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.C.S. & Campbell-Williams, M.: 1993, ‘Critical constructivism: Towards a balanced rationality in the high school mathematics classroom’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Organisation, Atlanta, GA.

  • Tobin, K.: 1993, (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K.: 1990, ‘Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education’, Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(4), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S.: 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cole, John-Steiner, Scribner & Souberman (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U 1987, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia

    David R. Geelan

Authors
  1. David R. Geelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geelan, D.R. Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism. Science & Education 6, 15–28 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017991331853

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017991331853

Keywords

Search

Navigation