Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of a Derivative of the Antiviral Agent 9-[(1,3-Dihydroxy-2-propoxy)-methyl]Guanine (DHPG) with Improved Oral Absorption

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various diesters of 9-[(l,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)-methyl]guanine (DHPG) were screened in order to identify a derivative with improved oral absorption. The solubilities and dissolution rates decreased with increasing chain length and branching of the ester group. However, the dipropionate ester showed an anomalously faster dissolution rate. The rates of hydrolysis to DHPG in the presence of intestinal homogenates were found to increase with increasing carbon number for the straight-chain alkyl esters and decreased with branching. The shorter-chain alkyl esters were relatively more stable in intestinal homogenates than in liver homogenates. Therefore they may have a better membrane permeability than DHPG due to their intact ester group. The hydrolysis rates in human blood increased with increasing carbon number for the straight-chain alkyl esters. The dipropionate ester appeared to be the most promising derivative because of its rapid dissolution rate, slower hydrolysis in the intestine, and rapid conversion to DHPG in liver and blood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. F. Smee, J. C. Martin, J. P. H. Verheyden, and T. R. Matthews. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23:676–682 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. C. Martin, C. A. Dvorak, D. F. Smee, T. R. Matthews, and J. P. H. Verheyden. J. Med. Chem. 26:759–761 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Physicians' Desk Reference, 39th ed., Medical Economics, Oradell, N.J., 1985.

  4. Pharm. J. 232:20 (1983).

  5. P. D. Miranda, H. C. Krasny, D. A. Page, and G. B. Elion. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 219:309–315 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. J. Rogers and A. S. E. Fowle, J. Clin. Hosp. Pharm. 8:89–102 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Higuchi and V. Stella. Prodrugs as Novel Drug Delivery Systems, ACS Symposium Series 14, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. B. Roche. Design of Biopharmaceutical Properties Through Prodrugs and Analogs, American Pharmaceutical Association/Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Symposium, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Sinkula and S. H. Yalkowsky. J. Pharm. Sci. 64:181–210 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Colla, E. De Clerq, R. Busson, and H. Vanderhaeghe. J. Med. Chem. 26:602–604 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. C. Baker, T. H. Haskell, and S. R. Putt. J. Med. Chem. 21:1218–1221 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. C. Baker, T. H. Haskell, S. R. Putt, and B. J. Sloan, J. Med. Chem. 22:273–279 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Verheyden and J. Martin. U.S.A. Patent 4, 556,659, Dec. 3, 1985.

  14. H. Hoeksema, G. B. Whitfield, and L. E. Rhuland. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 6:213–216 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. D. Welch. Cancer Res. 21:1475–1490 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. J. Benjamin, B. A. Firestone, and J. A. Schneider. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 23:168–170 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. H. Wood, J. E. Syarto, and H. Letterman. J. Pharm. Sci. 54:1068 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. J. Benjamin and L.-H. Lin. Drug Dev. Indust. Pharm. 11:771–790 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. H. Yalkowsky. In E. B. Roche (ed.), Design of Biopharmaceutical Properties Through Prodrugs and Analogs, American Pharmaceutical Association/Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Symposium, Washington, D.C., 1977, Chap. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Yamaoka, R. D. Roberts, and V. J. Stella. J. Pharm. Sci. 72:400–405 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Sasak, M. Fukumoto, M. Hashida, T. Kimura, and H. Sezaki. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 31:4083–4090 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. F. H. Ho, J. Y. Park, W. Morozowich, and W. I. Higuchi. In E. B. Roche (ed.), Design of Biopharmaceutical Properties Through Prodrugs and Analogs, American Pharmaceutical Association/Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Symposium, Washington, D.C., 1977, Chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Burr, H. Bundgaard, and E. Falch. Int. J. Pharm. 24:43–60 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Kawaguchi, Y. Suzuki, Y. Nakahara, N. Nambu, and T. Nagai. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 33:301–307 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Higuchi, P. Niphadkar, and T. Kawaguchi. In L. Benet, G. Levy, and B. Ferraiola (ed.), Pharmacokinet (Proc. Sidney Riegelman Meml. Symp.), Plenum, New York, 1982, pp. 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Dixon and E. C. Webb. Enzymes, 2nd ed., Longmans, Green, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benjamin, E.J., Firestone, B.A., Bergstrom, R. et al. Selection of a Derivative of the Antiviral Agent 9-[(1,3-Dihydroxy-2-propoxy)-methyl]Guanine (DHPG) with Improved Oral Absorption. Pharm Res 4, 120–125 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016462801968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016462801968

Navigation