Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Preliminary Data of the Metrix™ Atrioverter Expanded Indication Trial

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Metrix™ Atrioverter Expanded Indication Trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of an implantable atrial defibrillator in patients with symptomatic, recurrent and drug refractory atrial fibrillation who also have structural heart disease. In this ongoing multicenter study, all patients are anticoagulated and concomitant antiarrhythmic drug treatment is left to the preference of the physician. Holter monitoring is performed prior to enrollment in the study. Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) are treated under physician observation and when patients are ambulatory, the device is programmed in a monitoring mode. The atrial defibrillation threshold is measured at implantation and at 3, 6 and 12 months thereafter. The performance of the AF detection and R-wave synchronization algorithm is assessed at implantation, at regular follow-up intervals, and each time the patient visits the hospital for treatment of a spontaneous episode of AF. An echocardiogram is performed prior to implantation, at 3 and 6 month follow-up and for patients with an implanted heart valve, after 20 and 50 atrial defibrillation shocks have been delivered. The study started on October 1997 and will end after the last patient enrolled completes his/her six-month post-implantation follow-up, unless a safety issue arises. As of September 1998, 6 patients (2 patients with tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, 1 patient with a mitral valve prosthesis, 2 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 1 patient with congenital heart disease) have been enrolled in the study. Over 350 shocks have been delivered for atrial defibrillation testing or termination of spontaneous AF episodes. There have been no reported cases of ventricular proarrhythmia or inaccurately synchronized shocks and no complications of device therapy in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wellens HJJ, Lau CP, Lüderitz B, Akhtar M, Waldo AL, Camm AJ, Timmermans C, Tse HF, Jung W, Jordaens L, Ayers G. The Atrioverter, an implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1998;98:1651–1656.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. J Am Med Assoc 1994;271:840–844.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flaker GC, Blackshear JL, McBride R, Kronmal RA, Halperin JL, Hart RG. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falk RH. Proarrhythmia in patients treated for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coplen SE, Antman EM, Berlin JA, Hewitt P, Chalmers TC. Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation 1990;82:1106–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1967;29:469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ayers GM, Alferness CA, Ilina M, Smith WM, Cooper RAS, Ideker R. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation. Circulation 1994;89:413–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmermans, C., Rodriguez, LM., Ayers, G.M. et al. Design and Preliminary Data of the Metrix™ Atrioverter Expanded Indication Trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 4 (Suppl 1), 197–199 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009871724481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009871724481

Navigation