Abstract
Digital acquisition systems are widely used nowadays. The digitization of the cath lab environment is now directed towards the change in the exchange media from an analog (i.e. cinefilm) to a digital (i.e. CD-R) medium. An important consequence of this development is the need for another type of review system. This article focuses on the replacement of the cineprojector by a digital equivalent: the DICOM review station. Since the technologies differ fundamentally, the DICOM review station has very little in common with its analog predecessor. This article explains the basics of DICOM review stations. Different approaches, both in hardware and in software, are possible, each showing their advantages and drawbacks. The impact of choices made by the industry will be illustrated by a number of commercially available DICOM review stations. Further, the article discusses the topics of diagnostic image quality and performance. In our opinion, these are the major topics when it comes to an objective comparison of the capabilities of DICOM review stations. The relation of these subjects with design choices in terms of hardware and software are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc Group, ‘ACC, ACR and industry develop a standard for digital transfer of angiographic images’, J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 800-2.
The Cardiac and Vascular Information Working Group of DICOM, 'Digital Cardiac Imaging in the 21st Century: A Primer;, ACC/ASNC/ESC/ASE, 1997.
Parisot C, 'The DICOM standard;, Int J Cardiac Imag 1995; 11 (3): 171-7.
Goedhart B, Reiber JHC, ‘The Role of DICOM in the Digital Catheterization Laboratory’, In ‘Cardiovascular Imaging’, Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, 1996; 171-84.
Zwet PMJ van der, Reiber JHC, ‘The influence of image enhancement and recon-struction on quantitative coronary analysis’, Int J Cardiac Imag 1995; 11: 211-21.
Bronkalla M, Kennedy T, ‘Holding out for a digital solution’, J Cardiovasc Management 1993; 11/12: 21-4.
Weisteen Bjerde K, ‘IPI, MEDICOM and DICOM: Relations and possible future’, Int J Cardiac Imag 1995; 11 (3): 165-70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goedhart, B., Brand, GJ. & Reiber, J.H. The DICOM review stations: are they truly different?. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 14, 317–322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006025826795
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006025826795