Abstract
A mathematical model to predict the outcome of preserving plant viruses has been developed. The survival of two cucumber mosaic virus strains lyophilized in leaves and in protected plant sap was evaluated using an accelerated storage test at 28, 37 and 45 °C. The combinations of 5% (w/v) sorbitol and 7% (w/v) glucose with 3.6% (w/v) dextran 40 000 were applied as protecting media. The predicted values to a great extent correspond to the experimental data, achieved after 1, 4 and 7 years of storage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Donev T, Yordanova A, Stoimenova E, Damjanova S (1996) Determination of parameters for tobacco mosaic virus cryogenic treatment and freeze-drying. Biotechnol. Tech. 10: 971–976.
Greiff D, Rightsel W (1966) Recent research in freezing, drying and kinetics of thermal degradation of viruses. In: Rey L, ed. Advances in Freeze-Drying. Paris: Hermann, pp. 103–122.
Hollings M, Stone OM (1970) The long-term survival of some plant viruses preserved by lyophilization. Ann. Appl. Biol. 65: 411–418.
Koshelev AV, Nestorov AI (1987) An express test for predicting the survival of freeze-dried methanotrophous bacterial cultures. Mikrobiologia 56: 492–496.
McKinney HH, Silber G (1968) Methods for preservation and storage of plant viruses. In: Maramorosh K, Koprowski H, eds. Methods in Virology, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 491–501.
Stoimenova E (1995) Investigations of strain variability of tobamoviruses and cucumovirus isolated from Bulgaria. J. Culture Collections 1: 46–52.
Takanami Y (1981) A striking change in symptoms on cucumber mosaic virus-infected tobacco plant induced by a satellite RNA. Virology 109: 120–126.
Yordanova A, Stoimenova E, Donev T (1996) Application of accelerated storage test to lyophilized plant viruses. Biotechnol. Tech. 10: 977–982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yordanova, A., Stoimenova, E. & Donev, T. Prediction of the preservation of freeze-dried cucumber mosaic virus. Biotechnology Letters 22, 1779–1782 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005602320470
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005602320470