Skip to main content
Log in

Ranking Accounting Ph.D. Programs and Faculties Using Social Science Research Network Downloads

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We rank accounting Ph.D. programs and accounting faculties based on downloads individuals' working papers posted to the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) receive. We retain 185 individuals included in Accounting Faculty Directory 2002–2003 (Hasselback, 2002) whose work has been most heavily downloaded as of August 21, 2002. We rank Ph.D. programs (faculties) both adjusting and not adjusting for program (faculty) size. We provide rankings both without regards to when individuals graduated and for individuals graduating during three consecutive sub-periods: pre-1982, 1982–1991 and 1992–2001. We first provide rankings without regards to teaching or research area. After dichotomizing individuals into those whose teaching/research area is financial versus non-financial we provide additional rankings focusing on non-financial research areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazley, J. D. and L. A. Nikolai, “A Comparison of Published Accounting Research and Qualities of Accounting Faculty and Doctoral Programs.” The Accounting Review 51(July), 605-610 (1976).

  • Brown, L. D., “Ranking Journals Using Social Science Research Network Downloads.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 20(May), 291-307 (2003).

  • Brown, L. D. and J. C. Gardner, “Applying Citation Analysis to Evaluate the Research Contributions of Accounting Faculty and Doctoral Programs.” The Accounting Review 50(April), 262-277 (1985).

  • Bublitz B. and R. Kee, “Measures of Research Productivity.” Issues in Accounting Education 39-60 (1984).

  • Carpenter, C. G., L. D. Crumbley and R. H. Strawser, “A New Ranking of Accounting Faculties and Doctoral Programs.” Journal of Accountancy (June), 90-94 (1974).

  • Christensen, A. L., C. A. Finger and C. K. Latham, “New Accounting Scholars' Publications in Accounting and Nonaccounting Journals.” Issues in Accounting Education 17(August), 233-251 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Croom, D. L., “Dangers in the Use of the Science Citation Index.” Nature 227(5263), 1173 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, D., “Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review.” History of Science 17, 102-134 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselback, J. R., Accounting Faculty Directory 2002–2003, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselback, J. R. and A. Reinstein, “A Proposal for Measuring Scholarly Productivity of Accounting Faculty.” Issues in Accounting Education 10(Fall), 269-306 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, F. A., A. L. Hartgraves and L. H. Beard, “Publication Productivity of Doctoral Alumni: A Time-Adjusted Model.” The Accounting Review 51(January), 179-187 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRoberts, M. H. and B. R. MacRoberts, “Problems of Citation Analysis: A Critical Review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5), 342-349 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkowitz, L., “Research Dissemination and Impact: Evidence from Web Site Downloads.” Journal of Finance 57(February), 485-499 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trieschmann, J. S., A. R. Dennis, G. B. Northcraft and A. W. Niemi, Jr., “Serving Multiple Constituencies in Business Schools: MBA Program versus Research Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 43(6), 1130-1141 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, L.D., Laksmana, I. Ranking Accounting Ph.D. Programs and Faculties Using Social Science Research Network Downloads. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 22, 249–266 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REQU.0000025763.61552.0e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REQU.0000025763.61552.0e

Navigation