Skip to main content
Log in

Group Formation and Political Conflict: Instrumental and Expressive Approaches

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We construct models of the endogenous formation of politicalgroups designed to capture some of the key features ofpolitical and social conflict. We draw on the `citizencandidate' approach and consider both instrumental andexpressive approaches to understanding group formation andconflict between groups. We argue that the inclusion ofexpressive elements into the analysis of political groupsprovides both new insights and a better fit with certainaspects of the realities of political conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. and Kranton, R.E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 715–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997). An economic model of representative democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1998). Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice 95: 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1999). On political representation. British Journal of Political Science 29: 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic devices and desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1990). Amenity potential, indivisibilities and political competition. In J.E. Alt and K.A. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy, Ch. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M.R. and Skaperdas, S. (Eds.) (1996). The political economy of conflict and appropriation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, A. and Hjortland, M. (2000). Proportional representation with citizen candidates. Public Choice 103: 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1995). One for all: The logic of group conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1988). The analytics of continuing conflict. Synthese 76: 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1995). Theorizing about conflict. In K. Hartley and T. Sandler (Eds.), Handbook of defense economics, Vol. 1, Ch. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M.J. and Slivinski, A. (1996). A model of political competition with citizen candidates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler, A.A. (2000). A logic of expressive choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, D. (1992). The welfare economics of markets, voting and predation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Winden, F. (1999). On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics. Public Choice 100: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamlin, A., Jennings, C. Group Formation and Political Conflict: Instrumental and Expressive Approaches. Public Choice 118, 413–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000019908.98720.1e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000019908.98720.1e

Keywords

Navigation