Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to Teach Inquiry Science in a Technology-Based Environment: A Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a 2-year study designed to investigate the trajectory of change in an urban 5th grade teacher as she introduces science inquiry using the Web-Based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE). Data for this study included videotapes and transcripts of classroom instruction, and audiotapes and transcripts of interviews conducted with the teacher as she was implementing the curriculum. We also conducted retrospective interviews that enabled us to validate our account of the observational-based changes in the teacher's practices. The results suggest that the teacher's classroom practices shifted over time, from a greater focus on logistics to more of an inquiry orientation. The results further suggest that this shift can be attributed to repeated opportunities to teach a WISE curricular unit. They also show that support from the curriculum and other professionals, allowed the teacher to reflect on how her practices support students' learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts, B. (2000). Some thoughts of a scientist on inquiry. In Minstrell, J., and van Zee, E. H. (Eds.), Inquiring Into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp. 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, P., and Black, A. (1998). Development psychology as a guide for teaching and teacher preparation. In Lambert, N. M., and McCombs, B. L. (Eds.), How Students Learn: Reforming Schools Through Learner-Centered Education, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 409-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H., Ravitz, J., and Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and Teacher-Directed Student Use of Computers and Software, No. 3. Teaching Learning and Computing: 1998 National Survey, Center for Research in Information Technology in Organization, University of California at Irvine, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., and Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 393-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (2002). Connecting learning theory and instructional practice: Leveraging some powerful affordances of technology. In O'Neill, H., and Perez, R. (Eds.), Technology Application in Education: A Learning View, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 173-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., and Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education 19(6): 643-658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladewski, B. G., Krajcik, J. S., and Harvey, C. L. (1994). A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal 94: 499-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, A. L. (2002). Emerging Patterns of Technology Affordances in Teacher Discourse, Report No. IR-021-422. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 467501.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4: 103-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Clark, D., and Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Building Sustainable Science Curriculum: Acknowledge and Accommodating Local Adaptation 87: 517-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., and Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology 3: 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Eylon, B. S. (1996). Lifelong science learning: A longitudinal case study. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Society, 1996, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 597-602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Slotta, J. D. (2000, October). WISE science. Educational Leadership 58: 29-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., and Meyer, K. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal 94: 517-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1: 117-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, J. E., and Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Technology in science teacher education: Survey of current uses and desired knowledge among science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education 11: 131-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaen, C. L., and Roth, K. J. (1993). Similarities and Contrasts Between Writing During a Writers' Workshop and Writing in Science: Examining the Teacher's Role, Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 94, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 547.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J. (1996). Making learners and concepts central: A learner-centered, conceptual change approach to fifth-grade American history planning and teaching. Advances in Research on Teaching 6: 115-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G. (2000). Facilitating meaningful discussions about mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 6: 186-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator 10: 9–15, 43-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15: 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57: 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A., and Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher's perspective from the researchers' perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers' practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30: 252-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotta, J. D. (2004). The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., and Bell, P. (Eds.), Internet Environments for Science Education, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., and Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 5: 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R. G., and Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning and Schooling in Social Context, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y., and Frederiksen, J. R. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In Minstrell, J., and van Zee, E. H. (Eds.), Inquiring Into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp. 331-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., and Linn, M. C. (2002). WISE inquiry in fifth grade biology. Research in Science Education 32: 415-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., and Linn, M. C. (2003, September). Collaborating with WISE scientists. Science and Children 41: 31-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., and Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37: 318-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., and Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 443-463.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, M., Linn, M.C., Ammon, P. et al. Learning to Teach Inquiry Science in a Technology-Based Environment: A Case Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13, 189–206 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48

Navigation