Abstract
Conceptual and pragmatic issues relevant to the study of persons with autism are addressed within the context of comparison groups and matching strategies. We argue that no choice of comparison group or matching strategy is perfect, but rather needs to be determined by specific research objectives and theoretical questions. Thus, strategies can differ between studies in which the goal is to delineate developmental profiles and those in which the focus is the study of a specific aspect of functioning. We promote the notion of a “mosaic,” rather than a “melting pot,” approach to science in which researchers communicate conservative and precise interpretations of empirical findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Bowler, D. M. (2001). Autism: Specific cognitive deficit or emergent end point of multiple interacting systems? In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 219-235). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Burack, J. A. (1990). Differentiating mental retardation: The twogroup approach and beyond. In R. M. Hodapp, J. A. Burack, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Issues in the developmental approach to mental retardation (pp. 27-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burack, J. A. (1997). The study of atypical and typical populations in developmental psychopathology: The quest for a common science. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 139-165). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burack, J. A., & Volkmar, F. R. (1992). Development of low-and high-functioning autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 33, 607-616.
Burack, J. A., Pastò, L., Porporino M., Iarocci G., Mottron L., & Bowler, D. M. (2001a). Applying developmental principles to the study of autism. In E. Schopler, N. Yirmiya, C. Shulman, & L. M. Marcus (Eds.), The research basis for autism intervention (pp. 25-41). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Burack, J. A., Evans, D. W., Klaiman C., & Iarocci, G. (2001b). The mysterious myth of attention deficit and other defect stories: Contemporary issues in the developmental approach to mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 24, 299-320.
Burack, J. A., Iarocci G., Bowler, D. M., & Mottron, L. (2002). Benefits and pitfalls in the merging of disciplines: The example of developmental psychopathology and the study of persons with autism. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 225-237.
Dunn L., & Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
Dunn L., Dunn L., Whetton C., & Pintillie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Slough, UK: NFER-Nelson Publishing.
Happé, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the Theory of Mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843-855.
Hodapp, R. M., & Zigler, E. (1995). Past, present, and future issues in the developmental approach to mental retardation and developmental disabilities. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 299-331). New York: Wiley.
Klin A., & Volkmar, F. R. (1997). The pervasive developmental disorders: Nosology and profiles of development. In S. S. Luthar & J. A. Burack (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk, and disorder (pp. 208-226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Klin A., Sparrow, S. S., de Bildt A., Cicchetti, D. V., Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (1999). A normed study of face recognition in autism and related disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 499-508.
Mervis C., & Robinson, B. F. (1999). Methodological issues in crosssyndrome comparisons: Matching procedures, sensitivity, and specificity. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 115-130.
Mottron L., & Burack, J. A. (2001). Enhanced perceptual functioning in the development of autism. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 131-148). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mottron L., Burack, J. A., Iarocci G., Belleville S., & Enns, J. T. (2003). Locally oriented perception with intact global processing among adolescents with high-functioning autism: Evidence from multiple paradigms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 904-913.
Pani, J. R., Mervis, C. B., & Robinson, B. F. (1999). Global spatial organization by individuals with Williams syndrome. Psychological Science, 10, 453-458.
Plaisted K., Swettenham J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 733-742.
Rossen M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi U., Bihrle A., & Jones, W. (1996). Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In J. H. Beitchman, N. J. Cohen, M. M. Konstantareas, & R. Tannock (Eds.), Language, learning, and behavior disorders: Developmental, biological, and clinical perspectives (pp. 367-392). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Russo N., Burack, J. A., Flanagan T., Berringer D., Iarocci G., & Zelazo, P. D. (in press). Deconstructing the executive function deficit in autism: Implications for cognitive neuroscience. Brain and Cognition.
Siegel, D. J., Minshew, N. J., & Goldstein, G. (1996). Wechsler IQ profiles in diagnosis of high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 389-406.
Tager-Flusberg H., & Joseph, R. M. (2003). Identifying neurocognitive phenotypes in autism. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 28, 303-314.
Wagner S., Ganiban, J. M., & Cicchetti, D. (1990). Attention, memory and perception in infants with Down syndrome: A review and commentary. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), Children with Down syndrome: A developmental perspective (pp. 147-179). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wing L., & Gould, J. (1979). Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 11-29.
Zelazo, P. D., Burack, J. A., Benedetto E., & Frye, D. (1996). Theory of mind and rule use in individuals with Down syndrome: A test of uniqueness and specificity claims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 479-484.
Zigler, E. (1967). Familial mental retardation: A continuing dilemma. Science, 155, 292-298.
Zigler, E. (1969). Developmental versus difference theories of mental retardation and the problem of motivation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 536-556.
Zigler E., & Hodapp, R. M. (1986). Understanding mental retardation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zigler E., Bennett-Gates D., Hodapp R., & Henrich, C. C. (2002). Assessing personality traits of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 181-193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burack, J.A., Iarocci, G., Flanagan, T.D. et al. On Mosaics and Melting Pots: Conceptual Considerations of Comparison and Matching Strategies. J Autism Dev Disord 34, 65–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000018076.90715.00
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000018076.90715.00