Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Origins of the Franco-German EMU Controversies

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

EMU represented an important change in the economic constitution of the European Union. It is, to a large extent, a culmination of a process of Franco-German reconciliation and understanding. However, in the postwar period, there were significant differences in thought and economic policy-making in Germany and France. France was dominated by the “tradition républicaine”, giving a central role to the state in economic life. In Germany, the federal structure of the state went together with the social market economy. In this paper an analysis is presented of these differences in thought and economic policy-making, how they evolved through time, and how they contributed to shaping the nature and economic constitution of the European Union. The focus of the paper is on the Rome Treaties, the Werner Report and the Maastricht Treaty process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena, R. & Schmidt, C. (1999). “Keynes Before and After the General Theory: The Theoretical Contents of French Economists' Reactions, 1929-69.” In L. Pasinetti & B. Schefold (eds.), The Impact of Keynes on Economics in the 20th Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, G. & Padoa-Schioppa, T. (1988). “The Werner Report Revisited, Collection of Papers.” Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union. Luxembourg, April 1989, pp. 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balladur, E. (1988). “Mémorandum sur la Construction Monétaire Européenne.” ECU. 3, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. & Gordon, D. (1983). “A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model.” Journal of Political Economy. 91(4), 589–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. & Jonung, L. (2000). Lessons for EMU from the History of Monetary Unions, IEA Readings no. 50.

  • Bibow, J. (2002). “Zur (Re-) Etablierung zentralbankpolitischer Institutionen und Traditionen in Westdeutschland: Theoretische Grundlagen und politisches Kalkül (1946-67).” In C. Scheer (ed.), Studien zur Entwicklung der Ökonomischen Theorie XXII. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union. (1989). “Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community.” Delors Report, Luxembourg.

  • Council-Commission of the European Communities. (1970). “Report to the Council and the Commission on the Realisation by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community.” Werner Report, Luxembourg, October.

  • Dyson, K. & Featherstone, K. (1999). The Road to Maastricht. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emminger, O. (1977). The D-Mark in the Conflict between Internal and External Equilibrium, 1948-75. Essays in International Finance, no. 122, Princeton.

  • Fischer, F. (1994). “Modern Central Banking.” In F. Capie et al. (eds.), The Future of Central Banking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratianni, M. & von Hagen, J. (1992). The European Monetary System and European Monetary Union. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1968). “The Role of Monetary Policy.” American Economic Review. March, 1-17.

  • Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D. & Tabellini, D. (1991). “Institutions and Policies.” Economic Policy. (13), 341-392.

  • Gros, D. & Thygesen, N. (1998). European Monetary Integration, 2nd ed. Longman.

  • Haberer, J.-Y. (1981). “Les Problèmes de l'Identité Monétaire Européenne.” Statistiques et Etudes Financières. 3-16.

  • Hagemann, H. (2000). “The Post-1945 Development of Economics in Germany.” In A.W. Coats (ed.), The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge, pp. 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdegen, M. (1998). “Price Stability and Budgetary Restraints in the Economic and Monetary Union: The Law as Guardian of Economic Wisdom.” Common Market Law Review. 35, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, E. (2000). Decision Making for European Economic and Monetary Union, Group of Thirty Occasional Paper, No 62.

  • Hutchison, T. (1979). “Notes on the Effects of Economic Ideas on Policy: The Example of the German Social Market Economy.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. 135(3), 426–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klump, R. (1997). “Wege zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft.” Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik. 115/XVI, 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küsters, H. J. (1998). “Walter Hallstein and the Negotiations on the Treaties of Rome 1955-57.” In W. Loth, W. Wallace, & W. Wessels (eds.), Walter Hallstein. The Forgotten European? London: Macmillan, pp. 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1976). “Economic Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Journal of Monetary Economics. 104-129.

  • Maes, I. (1998). “Macroeconomic Thought at the European Commission in the 1970s: The First Decade of the Annual Economic Reports.” Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. (207), 387-412.

  • Maes, I. (2002). Economic Thought and the Making of European Monetary Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, I. & Quaglia, L. (2002). “The Process of European Monetary Integration: A Comparison of the Belgian and Italian Approaches.” Paper Presented at the 7th UACES Research Conference. Queen's University, Belfast, Sept. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjolin, R. (1963). “Rapport Général.” In P. Campilli (ed.), La Programmation Economique Européenne et la Programmation Economique Nationale dans les Pays de la C.E.E. Actes du Colloque de Rome, Vallecchi, pp. 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjolin, R. (1986). Architect of European Union. Memoirs 1911-1986, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (1992). The Bundesbank. London: Mandarin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massé, P. (1963). “La Programmation en France.” In P. Campilli (ed.), La Programmation Economique Européenne et la Programmation Economique Nationale dans les Pays de la C.E.E. Actes du Colloque de Rome, Vallecchi, pp. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnet, J. (1976). Mémoires. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer, C. (1992). “A Propos du Statut et de l'Indépendance des Banques Centrales.” Revue d'Economie Financière. (2), 13-18.

  • Padoa-Schioppa, T. (1994). The Road to Monetary Union in Europe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patat, J.-P. (1992). “Quelques Remarques sur la Question de l'Indépendance de la Banque Centrale.” Revue d'Economie Financière. Sept., 5-12.

  • Pöhl, K.-O. (1988). “The Further Development of the European Monetary System, Collection of Papers.” Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union, Luxembourg, 1989, pp. 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieter, H. & Schmolz, M. (1993). “The Ideas of German Ordoliberalism 1938-45.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1(1), 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallan, P. (1992). “l'Etat au Tournant.” In R. Lenoir & J. Lesourne (eds.), Où va l'Etat? Paris: Le Monde Editions, pp. 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunier, C. (2002). “L'Elysée et l'Organisation Economique de l'Europe 1981-1985.” In E. Bussière, S. Schirmann, & M. Dumoulin (eds.), Milieux Economiques et Intégration Européenne au XXe siècle. Paris: CHEFF, pp. 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schefold, B. (1998). Die Wirtschafts-und Sozialordnung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Spiegel des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 1948 bis 1989, mimeo.

  • Schmidt, C. (2000). “Economics in France: A Manifold System. A.W. Coats (ed.), The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge, pp. 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfelder, W. & Thiel, E. (1996). Ein Markt-Eine Währung, 2nd ed., Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, J. Maes, I. & Michielsen, J. (2000). “EMU from a Historical Perspective.” H. Ooghe et al. (eds.), The Economic and Business Consequences of EMU, New York: Kluwer, pp. 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. & Müssler, W. (1998). “Evolution of the Economic Constitution of the European Union.” In P. Newman (ed.), The New Palgrave of Economics and the Law, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan, pp. 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietmeyer, H. (1999). The Social Market Economy and Monetary Stability, London: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1954). International Economic Integration, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Groeben, H. (1979). “The Role of European Integration in the West German Economic Order.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. 135(5), 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, P. (1991). Itinéraires Luxembourgeois et Européens, Luxembourg: Editions Saint-Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Department, National Bank of Belgium, de Berlaimontlaan, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    Ivo Maes

Authors
  1. Ivo Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maes, I. On the Origins of the Franco-German EMU Controversies. European Journal of Law and Economics 17, 21–39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026333808962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026333808962

Search

Navigation