Skip to main content
Log in

Power and Personality: An Analysis of Gay Male Intimate Abuse

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the issue of gay male intimate abuse in a sample of 52 couples. The objective of the study was to explore the association between relationship power dynamics and the perpetration of psychological abuse, and to investigate the correspondence between intimate abuse and factors associated with the Abusive Personality [D. G. Dutton and A. J. Starzomski (1993) “Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse,” Violence and Victims, Vol. 8, pp. 327–337; D. G. Dutton (1994a) “Behavioral and Affective Correlates of Borderline Personality Organization in Wife Assaulters,” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 17, pp. 265–279.] The majority of participants were middle to upper class and their ethnic/racial breakdown is as follows: White (86%), Native American (7%), Asian (4%), and Other (3%). In terms of power, results indicated that the more frequent form of psychological abuse was significantly higher in relationships characterized by divided power (i.e., partners sharing decision-making authority by the partners each making decisions in different domains). This finding supports the supposition that abuse can occur in relatively egalitarian relationships. An association between intimate abuse and the Abusive Personality was also clearly observed and this personality profile seemed to characterize both members of abusive dyads. Conclusions are drawn regarding the generalizability of intimate abuse across lines of sexual orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Loseke, D. R., & Rauma, D. (1981). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., Jr. & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In M. Bograd & K. Yllo (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. (1992). Are women as violent as men? Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA.

  • Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Read, S. L. (1990). Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 644–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1994a). Behavioral and affective correlates of Borderline Personality Organization in wife assaulters. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17, 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D.G. (1994b). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Starzomski, A. J. (1993). Borderline personality in perpetrators of psychological and physical abuse. Violence and Victims, 8, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Starzomski, A. J., & Ryan, L. (1996). Antecedents of borderline personality organization in wife assaulters. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1367–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, N. (1996). A survey of factors contributing to gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerslma, A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (1990). Anxiety, depression and perception of early parenting: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1996). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., & Burk, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Attachment processes in adulthood (Vol. 5). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G. (1984). Borderline Personality Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Characteristics of male spouse abusers: Is psychopathology part of the picture? Paper presented at American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and nonviolent men: Some continuities and discontinuities. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implication for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1982). Gay children grown up: Gender culture and gender deviance. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1989). Parental physical abuse and sexual orientation in males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1990). A probability sample of gay males. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Dutton, D. G., & Newlove, T. (1993). The prevalence of personality disorder among wife assaulters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. L., Perry, J. C. & van der Kolk, B. A. (1989). Childhood trauma in Borderline Personality Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Island, D., & Letellier, P. (1991). Men who beat the men who love them. New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., & Painter, S. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. E., & Warshafsky, L. (July, 1987). Partner abuse in gay male and lesbian couples. Paper presented at the Third National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.

  • Kenny, D. A. (1988). The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1977). The structural diagnosis of borderline personality organization. In P. Hartocollis (Ed.), Borderline Personality Disorder: The concept, the syndrome, the patient. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letellier, P. (1994). Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: Challenges to feminist theory. Violence and Victims, 9, 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, G. S. (1996). Ruling the exceptions: Same-sex battering and domestic violence theory. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., & Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In T. H. McGlashan (Ed.), The Borderline: Current empirical research. The progress in psychiatry series. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Cromwell, R. E. (1975). Power in families. In R. E. Cromwell, & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (1993). Lesbian and gay relationships. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male experiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1983). The intimate relationships of lesbian and gay men. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), The changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 61, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, R., & Segrist, A. E. (1981). The association of selected “masculine” sex-role variables with length of relationship in gay male couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 7, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. W., Campbell, R. L., & Clayter, J. R. (1982). New inventory of measurement of parental rearing patterns: An English form of the EMBU. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 66, 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1988). Other “truths” about domestic violence: A reply to McNeely and Robinson-Simpson. Social Work, 33, 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. M. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, C. (1988). The borderline personality disorder and gay people. Journal of Homosexuality, 15, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of the feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J., & Straus, M. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring family conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1980). The Evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Psychologist, 44, 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitam, F. L. (1977). Childhood indicators of male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K., & Straus, M. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M., & Coryell, W. (1989). DSM-III personality disorder diagnosis in a nonpatient sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 682–689.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landolt, M.A., Dutton, D.G. Power and Personality: An Analysis of Gay Male Intimate Abuse. Sex Roles 37, 335–359 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025649306193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025649306193

Keywords

Navigation