Skip to main content
Log in

Twenty-Five Centuries of Quantum Physics: From Pythagoras to Us, and from Subjectivism to Realism

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three main theses are proposed. The first is that the idea of a quantum or minimal unit is not peculiar to quantum theory, since it already occurs in the classical theories of elasticity and electrolysis. Second, the peculiarities of the objects described by quantum theory are the following: their basic laws are probabilistic; some of their properties, such as position and energy, are blunt rather than sharp; two particles that were once together continue to be associated even after becoming spatially separated; and the vacuum has physical properties, so that it is a kind of matter. Third, the orthodox or Copenhagen interpretation of the theory is false, and may conveniently be replaced with a realist (though not classicist) interpretation. Heisenberg's inequality, Schrödinger's cat and Zeno's quantum paradox are discussed in the light of the two rival interpretations. It is also shown that the experiments that falsified Bell's inequality do not refute realism but the classicism inherent in hidden variables theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballentine, L.E. (ed.): 1988, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics since the Bell Inequalities: Selected Reprints, American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S.: 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables”’, Physical Review 85, 166–179; 180–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1957, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1958, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P.W.: 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1959, Causality: The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Dover reprint, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1967, Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1973, Philosophy of Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1985, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 7, Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part I: Formal and Physical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. and Kálnay, A.J.: 1983, ‘Solution to Two Paradoxes in the Quantum Theory of Unstable Systems’, Nuovo Cimento 77B, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M.: 1983, ‘Quantum Theory of Measurement Without Quantum Collapse’, Nuovo Cimento 73B, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, J.F. and Shimony, A.: 1978, ‘Bell's Theorem: Experimental Tests and Implications’, Reports of Progress in Theoretical Physics 41, 1881–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Peña Auerbach, L.: 1969, ‘New Formulation of Stochastic Theory and Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10, 1620–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, B.: 1981, A la recherche du réel: Regard d'un physicien, 2nd edn, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1948, ‘Quantum Theory and Reality’, Dialectica 2, 32–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 47, 777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. (ed.): 1953, Louis de Broglie: Physicien et penseur, Albin Michel, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W.: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper & Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: 1966, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite-Lopes, J., and Paty, M. (eds): 1977, Quantum Mechanics: A Half Century Later, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, W.: 1961, Aufsätze und Vorträge über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P.A. (ed.): 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: 1955 [1932], Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H. (eds): 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunge, M. Twenty-Five Centuries of Quantum Physics: From Pythagoras to Us, and from Subjectivism to Realism. Science & Education 12, 445–466 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336332476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336332476

Navigation