Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound, a new separation technique to harvest microalgae

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article it is proven that ultrasound can be used to harvest microalgae. The separation process is based on gentle acoustically induced aggregation followed by enhanced sedimentation. In this paper, the efficiency of harvesting and the concentration factor of the ingoing biomass concentration are optimized and the relevance of this process compared to other harvesting processes is determined. For the optimisation, five parameters were modeled simultaneously by the use of an experimental design. An experimental design was chosen, because of possible interaction effects between the different parameters. The efficiency of the process was modeled with a R-squared of 0.88. The ingoing flow rate and the biomass concentration had a lot of influence on the efficiency of the process. Efficiencies higher than 90% were reached at high biomass concentrations and flow rates of 4–6 L day−1. At most, 92% of the organisms could be harvested and a concentration factor of 11 could be achieved at these settings. It was not possible to harvest this microalga with higher efficiencies due to its small size and its small density difference with water. The concentration factor of the process was modeled with a R-squared of 0.75. The ingoing flow rate, biomass concentration and ratio between harvest flow and ingoing flow rate had a significant effect on the concentration factor. Highest concentration factors, up to 20, could be reached at low biomass concentrations and low harvest flows. On industrial scale, centrifuges can better be used to harvest microalgae, because of lower power consumption, better efficiencies and higher concentration factors. On lab- or pilot-plant scale, an ultrasonic harvesting process has the advantages that it can be operated continuously, it evokes no shear stress and the occupation space is very small. Also, when the algae excrete a soluble high valued product this system can be used as a biofilter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bierau H., Perani A., Al-Rubeai M. and Emery A.N. 1998. A comparison of intensive cell culture bioreactors operating with Hybridomas modified for inhibited apoptotic response. J. Biotechnol. 62: 195-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakley W.T., Hawkes J.J., Sobanski M.A., C ousins C.M. and Spengler J. 2000. Analytical scale ultrasonic standing wave manipulation of cells and microparticles. Ultrasonics 38: 638-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblhoff-Dier O., Gaida T. and Katinger H. 1994. A novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal cells. Biotechnol. Progr. 10: 428-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröschl M. 1998. Ultrasonic Separation of Suspended Particles - Part I: Fundamentals. Acust. Acta Acust. 84: 432-447. Gröschl M., Burger W., Handl B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblhoff-Dier O., Gaida T. and Schmatz C. 1998. Ultrasonic Separation of Suspended Particles - Part III: Application in Biotechnology. Acust. Acta. Acust. 84: 815-822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland P.D. 1989. Experimental Design in Biotechnology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York and Basel, 259 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes J.J. and Coakley W.T. 1996. A continuous flow ultrasonic cell-filtering method. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 19: 57-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes J.J., Limaye M.S. and Coakley W.T. 1997. Filtration of bacteria and yeast by ultrasound-enhanced sedimentation. J. appl. Microbiol. 82: 39-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap S., Sundararajan A. and Lu-Kwang J. 1998. Flotation characteristics of cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae for gas vesicle production. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 60: 636-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilburn D.G., Clarke D.J., Coakley W.T. and Bardsley D.W. 1989. Enhanced sedimentation of mammalian cells following acoustic aggregation. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 34: 559-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschek H.E. 1984. Independence of buoyant cell density and growth rate in Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 158: 296-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschek H.E. 1987. Buoyant density variation during the cell cycle in microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 73-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers R.H. and Montgomery D.C. 1995. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippka R., Deruelles J., Waterbury J.B., Herdman M. and Stanier R.Y. 1979. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J. gen. Microbiol. 111: 1-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryll T., Dutina G., Reyes A., Gunson J., Krummen L. and Etcheverry T. 2000. Performance of small-scale CHO perfusion cultures using an acoustic cell filtration device for cell retention: Characterization of separation efficiency and impact of perfusion on product quality. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 69: 440-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler J. and Jekel M. 2000. Ultrasound conditioning of suspensions - studies of streaming influence on particle aggregration on a lab-and pilot-plant scale. Ultrasonics 38: 624-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trampler F., Sonderhoff S.A., Pui P.W.S., Kilburn D.G. and Piret J.M. 1994. Acoustic cell filter for high density perfusion culture of hybridoma cells. Bio/Technology 12: 281-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg H., Oudshoorn A., Trampler F. and Keijzer T. 2001. High density cell cultures in perfusions. A perspective for vaccine production? BIOforum International 5: 37-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmeier P., Glauner B. and Lindl T. 1993. Quantification of cytotoxicity by cell volume and cell profileration. ATLA 21: 269-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J., Collins A., Chen M., Knyazev I. and Gentz R. 1998. High-Density Perfusion Culture of Insect Cells with a BioSep Ultrasonic Filter. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 59: 351-359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosma, R., van Spronsen, W.A., Tramper, J. et al. Ultrasound, a new separation technique to harvest microalgae. Journal of Applied Phycology 15, 143–153 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023807011027

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023807011027

Navigation