Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Time Course of Grammatical and Phonological Processing During Speaking: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor-related brain potentials were used to examine the time course of grammatical and phonological processes during noun phrase production in Dutch. In the experiments, participants named colored pictures using a no-determiner noun phrase. On half of the trials a syntactic–phonological classification task had to be performed before naming. Depending on the outcome of the classifications, a left or a right push-button response was given (go trials), or no push-button response was given (no-go trials). Lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) were derived to test whether syntactic and phonological information affected the motor system at separate moments in time. The results showed that when syntactic information determined the response-hand decision, an LRP developed on no-go trials. However, no such effect was observed when phonological information determined response hand. On the basis of the data, it can be estimated that an additional period of at least 40 ms is needed to retrieve a word's initial phoneme once its lemma has been retrieved. These results provide evidence for the view that during speaking, grammatical processing precedes phonological processing in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego: Acadamic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue phenomenon.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H., Smid, H. G. O. M., Scheffers, M. K., & Otten, L. J. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In M. D. Rugg, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86-113). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P-F., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Laubert, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 721-750.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 210-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M., & Holmes, V. M. (1978). Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition, 6, 35-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. (1992). Disorders of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143-180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 9 (pp. 133-177). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 231-256). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 1 (pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. III. Language: psychological and biological aspect (pp. 69-96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958). Report to the committee on methods and clinical examination in e electroencephalography. Appendix: The ten-twenty system of the International federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschafts-potential und reafferente Potentiale [Brain potential changes associated with voluntary and passive movements in humans: Readiness potential and reafferent potentials]. Pflüger's Archive, 284, 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1974). Studies of squeezing: Handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential. Science, 186, 545-548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1977). The effects of handedness, of responding hand, and of response force on the contralateral dominance of the readiness potential. In J. Desmedt (Ed.), Attention, voluntary contraction, and event-related potentials (pp. 189-210). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95-115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes, and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In W. Klein & W. Levelt (Eds.). Crossing the boundaries in linguistics (pp. 221-252). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323-350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 19-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. L., Bock, K., & Kelly, M. K. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188-230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524-545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42, 181-211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. O. (1991). Discrete versus continuous information processing: Introduction and psychophysiology. In C. H. M. Brunia, G. Mulder, & M. N. Verbaten (Eds.), Event-related brain research: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Suppl. 42 (pp. 244-259). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment of the analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, J. W., Syndulko, K., & Lindsley, D. B. (1976). Brain wave components of the contingent negative variation in humans. Science, 191, 1055-1057.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers, H. (1992). Lexical access in the production of noun phrases. Cognition, 45, 33-54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Huffnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial-order mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Huffnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 109-136). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J. M., & Brands, G. J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1101-1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1998). Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition, 11, 115-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280, 572-754.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., & Ritter, W. (1968). Topography of the human motor potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 1-10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311-334.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Miranda van Turennout, Peter Hagoort & Colin Brown

Authors
  1. Miranda van Turennout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Hagoort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Colin Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P. & Brown, C. The Time Course of Grammatical and Phonological Processing During Speaking: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. J Psycholinguist Res 28, 649–676 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023221028150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023221028150

Keywords

Search

Navigation