Skip to main content
Log in

Tensegrity Behaviour of Cortical and Cytosolic Cytoskeletal Components in Twisted Living Adherent Cells

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to relate the multicomponent response of the cytoskeleton (CSK), evaluated in twisted living adherent cells, to the heterogeneity of the cytoskeletal structure - evaluated both experimentally by means of 3D reconstructions, and theoretically considering the predictions given by two tensegrity models composed of (four and six) compressive elements and (respectively 12 and 24) tensile elements. Using magnetic twisting cytometry in which beads are attached to integrin receptors linked to the actin CSK of living adherent epithelial cells, we specifically measured the elastic CSK response at quasi equilibrium state and partitioned this response in terms of cortical and cytosolic contributions with a two-component model (i.e., a series of two Voigt bodies). These two CSK components were found to be prestressed and exhibited a stress-hardening response which both characterize tensegrity behaviour with however significant differences: compared to the cytosolic component, the cortical cytoskeleton appears to be a faster responding component, being a less prestressed and easily deformable structure. The discrepancies in elastic behaviour between the cortical and cytosolic CSK components may be understood on the basis of prestress tensegrity model predictions, given that the length and number of constitutive actin elements are taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albrecht-Buehler, G. (1987). Role of cortical tension in fibroblast shape and movement. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 7: 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, J.H., and D.W. Scharpf (1972). Large Deflection Analysis of Prestressed Networks. Journal of the Structural Division 106: 633–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, A.R., U. Hellerer, M. Essler, M. Aepfelbacher and E. Sackmann (2001). Rapid stiffening of integrin receptor-actin linkages in endothelial cells stimulated with thrombin: a magnetic bead microrheology study. Biophysical Journal 80: 2649–2657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, A.R., F. Ziemann, A.A. Boulbitch, K. Jacobson and E. Sackmann (1998). Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophysical Journal 75: 2038–2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretscher, A. (1991). Microfilament structure and function in the cortical cytoskeleton. Annual Reviews Cell & Developmental Biology 7: 337–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caille, N., O. Thoumine, Y. Tardy and J.J. Meister (2002). Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. Journal of Biomechanics 35: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañadas, P., V.M. Laurent, C. Oddou, D. Isabey and S. Wendling (2002). A cellular tensegrity model to analyze the structural viscoelasticity of the cytoskeleton. Journal of Theoretical Biology 218: 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.S., and D.E. Ingber (1999). Tensegrity and mechanoregulation: from skeleton to cytoskeleton. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7: 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., C.A. Hartemink, J.H. Hartwig and C.F. Dewey, Jr. (2000). Three-dimensional reconstruction of the actin cytoskeleton from stereo images. Journal of Biomechanics 33: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicurel, M.E., C.S. Chen and D.E. Ingber (1998). Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 10: 232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, D., D.P. Felsenfeld and M.P. Sheetz (1997). Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 88: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, M.F., and D. Stamenovic (1997). A Tensegrity Structure with Buckling Compression Elements: Application to Cell Mechanics. Journal of Applied Mechanics 64: 480–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discher, D.E., and N. Mohandas (1996). Kinematics of red cell aspiration by fluorescence-imaged microdeformation. Biophysical Journal 71: 1680–1694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discher, D.E., N. Mohandas and E.A. Evans (1994). Molecular maps of red cell deformation: hidden elasticity and in situ connectivity. Science 266: 1032–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, C., R. Skalak and K.L. Sung (1991). Cytoplasmic rheology of passive neutrophils. Biorheology 28: 557–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E., and A. Yeung (1989). Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophysical Journal 56: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabry, B., G. Maksym, R. Hubmayr, J. Butler and J. Fredberg (1999). Implications of heterogeneous bead behavior on cell mechanical properties measured with magnetic twisting cytometry. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 194: 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.E., and J.K. Boyles (1988). The membrane skeleton—a distinct structure that regulates the function of cells. Bioessays 8: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.B. (Ed.) (1975). Synergetics; Explorations of the geometry of thinking, Vol. 1. Macmillan Publishing Co, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.B., and R. Marks (Eds) (1973). The Dymaxion World of Buckminster Fuller. Doubleday & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Y.C. (Ed.) (1981). Biomechanics; Mechanical properties of living tissues, Vol. 1. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittes, F., B. Mickey, J. Nettleton and J. Howard (1993). Flexural Rigidity of Microtubules and Actin Filaments Measured from Thermal Fluctuations in Shape. The Journal of Cell Biology 120: 923–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, O.P., and B. Martinac (2001). Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiological Reviews 81: 685–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, J.H., and P. Shevlin (1986). The architecture of actin filaments and the ultrastructural location of actin-binding protein in the periphery of lung macrophages. Journal of Cell Biology 103: 1007–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann, S.R., S. Kaech, R.E. Buxbaum and A. Matus (1999). Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. Journal of Cell Biology 145: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmuth, R.M. (2000). Micropipette aspiration of living cells. Journal of Biomechanics 33: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmuth, R.M., and R.E. Waugh (1987). Erythrocyte membrane elasticity and viscosity. Annual Review of Physiology 49: 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., and D.E. Ingber (2002). A discrete cell cycle checkpoint in late G(1) that is cytoskeleton-dependent and MAP kinase (Erk)-independent. Experimental Cell Research 275: 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E. (1993). Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science 104: 613–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E. (1997). Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annual Review Of Physiology 59: 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E. (2000). Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics. Journal of Applied Physiology 89: 1663–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E., and J.D. Jamieson (1985). Cells as tensegrity structures: architectural regulation of histodifferentiation by physical forces transduced over basement membrane. In: Andersson, L., C. Gahmberg and P. Ekblom (Eds). Gene expression during normal and malignant differentiation. Academic Press, Orlando: 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E., L. Dike, L. Hansen, S. Karp, H. Liley, A. Maniotis, H. McNamee, D. Mooney, G. Plopper and J. Sims (1994). Cellular tensegrity: exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. International Review of Cytology 150: 173–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, D.E., J.A. Madri and J.D. Jamieson (1981). Role of basal lamina in the neoplastic disorganization of tissue architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: 3901–3905.

  • Janmey, P.A. (1998). The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiological Reviews 78: 763–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh, K., Y. Kano, M. Masuda, H. Onishi and K. Fujiwara (1998). Isolation and contraction of the stress fiber. Molecular Biology of the Cell 9: 1919–1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh, K., M. Masuda, Y. Kano, Y. Jinguji and K. Fujiwara (1995). Focal adhesion proteins associated with apical stress fibers of human fibroblasts. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 31: 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, V.M., S. Hénon, E. Planus, R. Fodil, M. Balland, D. Isabey and F. Gallet (2002). Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 124: 408–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodish, H., A. Berk, S.L. Zipursky, P. Matsudaira, D. Baltimore and J.E. Darnell (1999). Cell Motility and Shape. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th ed., W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniotis, A.J., C.S. Chen and D.E. Ingber (1997). Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 849–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, A.B., G.A. Truskey and W.M. Reichert (2000). Atomic force and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the study of force transmission in endothelial cells. Biophysical Journal 78: 1725–1735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motro, R. (1990). Tensegrity Systems and Geodesic Domes. International Journal of Space Structures 5: 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, D., and R.M. Hochmuth (1992). A sensitive measure of surface stress in the resting neutrophil. Biophysical Journal 61: 1664–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planus, E., S. Galiacy, M. Matthay, V. Laurent, J. Gavrilovic, G. Murphy, C. Clérici, D. Isabey, C. Lafuma and M.P. d'Ortho (1999). Role of collagenase in mediating in vitro alveolar epithelial wound repair. Journal of Cell Science 112: 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourati, J., A. Maniotis, D. Spiegel, J.L. Schaffer, J.P. Butler, J.J. Fredberg, D.E. Ingber, D. Stamenovic and N. Wang (1998). Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? American Journal of Physiology 274: C1283–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, A. (Ed.) (1976). Introduction to tensegrity. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M., M.J. Levesque and R.M. Nerem (1987). An application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of the mechanical properties of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 109: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Schonbein, G.W., T. Kosawada, R. Skalak and S. Chien (1995). Membrane model of endothelial cells and leukocytes. A proposal for the origin of a cortical stress. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 117: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafrir, Y., and G. Forgacs (2002). Mechanotransduction through the cytoskeleton. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology 282: C479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamenovic, D., and M.F. Coughlin (1999). The Role of Prestress and Architecture of the Cytoskeleton and Deformability of Cytoskeletal in Mechanics of Adherent Cells: a Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 201: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamenovic, D., and M.F. Coughlin (2000). A quantitative model of cellular elasticity based on tensegrity. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 122: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamenovic, D., D.E. Ingber, N. Wang and J.J. Fredberg (1996). A Microstructural Approach to Cytoskeletal Mechanics based on Tensegrity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 181: 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoumine, O. (1996). Control of Cellular Morphology by Mechanical Factors. Journal of Physics III 6: 1555–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachsstock, D.H., W.H. Schwarz and T.D. Pollard (1994). Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels. Biophysical Journal 66: 801–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. (1998). Mechanical interactions among cytoskeletal filaments. Hypertension 32: 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., J.P. Butler and D.E. Ingber (1993). Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260: 1124–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., and D.E. Ingber (1994). Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. Biophysical Journal 66: 2181–2189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., K. Naruse, D. Stamenovic, J.J. Fredberg, S.M. Mijailovich, I.M. Tolic-Norrelykke, T. Polte, R. Mannix and D.E. Ingber (2001). Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 7765–7770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, S., C. Oddou and D. Isabey (1999). Stiffening response of a cellular tensegrity model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 196: 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, S., C. Oddou and D. Isabey (2000a). Approche Structurale de la mécanique du cytosquelette: solide alvéolaire vs modèle de tenségrité. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 328 (Série IIb): 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, S., E. Planus, V.M. Laurent, L. Barbe, A. Mary, C. Oddou and D. Isabey (2000b). Role of cellular tone and microenvironmental conditions on cytoskeleton stiffness assessed by tensegrity model. The European Physical Journal Applied Physics 9: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, S., D. Wirtz and S.C. Kuo (2000). Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. Biophysical Journal 1: 1736–1747.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laurent, V.M., Cañadas, P., Fodil, R. et al. Tensegrity Behaviour of Cortical and Cytosolic Cytoskeletal Components in Twisted Living Adherent Cells. Acta Biotheor 50, 331–356 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022676903680

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022676903680

Navigation