Abstract
This study investigates the role of self-citation in the scientific production of Norway (1981-1996). More than 45,000 publications have been analysed. Using a three-year citation window we find that 36% of all citations represent author self-citations. However, this percentage is decreasing when citations are traced for longer periods. We find the highest share of self-citation among the least cited papers. There is a strong positive correlation between the number of self-citations and the number of authors of the publications. Still, only a minor part of the overall increase in citation rates that can be found for multi-authored papers is due to self-citations. Also, the share of self-citation shows significant variations among different scientific disciplines. The results are relevant for the discussion concerning use of citation indicators in research assessments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. J. Phelan, A compendium of issues for citation analysis, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 117–136.
S. M. Lawani, On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1982) 281–284.
P. O. Seglen, Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy, 52 (1997) 1050–1056.
M. H. Macroberts, B. R. Macroberts, Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 342–349.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990, p. 220.
E. Garfield, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 359–375.
R. Tagliacozzo, Self-citation in scientific literature, Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 251–265.
S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Patterns of self citation across fields of inquiry, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 27 (1990) 204–207.
H. Snyder, S. Bonzi, Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989), Journal of Information Science, 24 (1998) 432–435.
T. N. van Leeuwen, E. J. Rinia, A. F. J. van Raan, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Physics Research in the Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS 96–09, Leiden, 1996.
H. F. Moed, J. G. M. van der Velde, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Chemistry Research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS-93–08, Leiden, 1993.
A. J. Nederhof, R. F. Meijer, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. van Raan, Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 157–178.
H. Herbertz, Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 117–122.
A. F. J. van Raan, The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results, Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 423–428.
E. Garfield, Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979, p. 245.
S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others, Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 245–254.
E. Garfield, A. Welljams-Dorof, Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making, Science and Public Policy, 19 (1992) 321–327.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aksnes, D.W. A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56, 235–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021919228368
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021919228368