Abstract
Understanding tillage system interaction with landscape variability is important in prescribing appropriate tillage systems that are profitable and environmentally sound. A three-year (1997–1999) study was conducted on a gently sloping, poorly drained lacustrine landscape to evaluate tillage, landscape, and soil interactions on grain yield. Tillage systems investigated were a reduced tillage (RT) system [no-tillage after soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr), fall chisel plowing after corn (Zea mays (L.) var. mays)], and a conventional tillage (CT) system (fall chisel plowing after soybean and fall moldboard plowing after corn). Fall primary tillage was followed with a pre-plant field cultivation in the spring. Runoff and pollutant losses from the two tillage systems were also measured under a 63 mm h−1 simulated rainfall. Runoff and pollutant (total solids, chemical oxygen demand, total P, dissolved molybdate reactive P) losses were similar, or lower (6.6, 8.0, 7.7, 5.5, and 4.1 times, respectively) in the RT than the CT system. Tillage system, landscape elevation, and soil type interactions on crop yield varied depending upon whether it was a wet or dry growing season. Using the interactions, soybean yield differences among the modeled fixed-RT, fixed-CT, and variable tillage (VT) systems in a wet year were less than 0.1 Mg ha−1. During a dry year, corn yield was higher in the RT and the VT systems than in the CT system. When no new purchase of tillage equipment(s) is necessary to implement the RT, VT, or CT system, the modest yield benefits during relatively dry years, plus the improved runoff water quality by using reduced tillage system in all or part of the landscape, would justify the use of RT and VT systems over the CT system in the lacustrine landscape.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, J. L. and Laflen, J. M. 1983. Water quality consequences of conservation tillage. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38, 186.
Bhatti, A. U., Mulla, D. J., Koehler, F. E., and Gurmani, A. H. Identifying and removing spatial correlation from yield experiments. 1991. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 1523.
Doerge, T. Weigh wagon vs. yield monitor comparison. 1997. Crop Insight 7, 1.
ESRI. 1998. Arc View GIS Version 3.1 (Environmental Systems Research Intitute Inc., Redlands, CA). Available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcview/ (verified 27 January 2000).
Ghaffarzadeh, M., Garcia, P. F., and Cruse, R. M. 1997. Tillage effect on soil water content and corn yield in a strip intercropping system. Agronomy Journal 89, 893.
Ginting, D., Moncrief, J. F., and Gupta, S. C. 2000. Runoff, solids, and contaminant losses into surface tile inlets draining lacustrine depressions. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 551.
Ginting, D., Moncrief, J. F., Gupta, S. C., and Evans, S. D. 1998a. Corn yield, runoff, and sediment losses from manure and tillage systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 27, 1396.
Ginting, D., Moncrief, J. F., Gupta, S. C., and Evans, S. D. 1998b. Interaction between manure and tillage system on phosphorus uptake and runoff losses. Journal of Environmental Quality 27, 1403.
Golden Software. 1996. Surfer for Windows Version 6 (Golden Software, Golden, CO).
Gupta, S. C., Schneider, E. C., and Swan, J. B. 1988. Planting depth and tillage interactions on corn emergence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 1122.
Laflen, J. M. and Colvin, T. S. 1981. Effects of crop residue on soil loss from continuous row cropping. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24, 605.
Laflen, J. M., Amemiya, M., and Hintz, E. A. 1981. Measuring residue cover J. Soil Water Conserv. 32, 341.
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., and Wolfinger, R. D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Mallarino, A. P., Wittry, D. J., Dousa, D., and Hinz, P. N. 1998. Variable rate phosphorus fertilization. On farm methods and evaluation for corn and soybean. In Precision Agriculture, Proceeding of the 4th International Conference, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Hust, and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI), p. 687.
Moncrief, J., Swan, J. B., and Wagar, T. 1988. Management of soils in south-central Minnesota. AG-FO-3347 (Minnesota Extension Service, Univ. of Minnesota).
Mulla, D. J., Bhatti, A. U., and Kunkel, R. 1990. Methods for removing spatial variability from field research trials. In Dryland Agriculture, edited by R. P. Singh, J. F. Parr, and B. A. Stewart (Springer-Verlag, New York), p. 201.
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31.
Olsen, S. R. and Sommers, L. E., Phosphorus 1982. In Methods of Soil Analysis, edited by A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI), p. 403.
Olson, T. C. and Schoeberl, L. S. 1970. Corn yields, soil temperature, and water use with four tillage methods in the western Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal 62, 229.
Randall, G. W. and Iragavarapu, T. K. 1995. Impact of long-term tillage systems for continuous corn on nitrate leaching to tile drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality 24, 360.
U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center, 1999. Corpscon Version 5.11 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA,). Available at http://crunch.tec.army.mil/software/corpscon/corpscon.html (verified 27 January 2000).
U.S. EPA, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. 1979. EPA-600/4-79-020 (U.S. Gov. Print, Office, Washington, DC).
U.S. EPA, Procedures for Handling and Chemical Analysis of Sediment and Water Samples. 1981. (U.S. Environmental Laboratory-U.S. Army Engineer Water Ways Exp. Stn., Vicksburg, MS).
Wilcox, J. Does your yield monitor lie? 2000. Successful Farming, Mid-March, 22.
Yeh, P. J. F. and Eltahir, E. A. B. 1998. Stochastic analysis of the relationship between topography and the spatial distribution of soil moisture. Water Resource Research 34, 1251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ginting, D., Moncrief, J.F. & Gupta, S.C. Performance of a Variable Tillage System Based on Interactions with Landscape and Soil. Precision Agriculture 4, 19–34 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021806920399
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021806920399