Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging Demography: Contributions from Feminist Theory

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Demography as a field has made limited progress in its work on understanding the role of gender in demographic change for several reasons. This paper explores the theoretical, methodological, and political influences on this understanding. For example, demography can be seen as a field that because of its stability and resources, has not been forced into the “crises” that might force it to question its assumptions and methodologies; it has not developed a tradition of reflexivity, one which might address alternative approaches to this and other issues, such as the political nature of population work. In addition, partly because of a reliance on certain kinds of methodological approaches, demographers tend to use measures of gender that reflect individual characteristics rather than those that allow understanding of gender at a larger level, or provide information beyond the individual. The result is a particular approach to gender within demographic studies. Feminist theoretical approaches to gender could contribute to the field and the study of population change in general in several key ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Acker, Joan, Kate Barry, and Johanna Esseveld 1991 “Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research.” In M. Fonow and J. Cook (eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research: 133–153. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Margaret 1993 Thinking About Women: Sociological Perspectives on Sex and Gender. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Michele and Anne Phillips 1992 “Introduction.” In M. Barrett and A. Phillips (eds.), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates: 1–9. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneria, Lourdes and Martha Roldan 1987 The Crossroads of Class and Gender: Industrial Homework, Subcontracting, and Household Dynamics in Mexico City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla 1990 “Epistemologies of postmodernism: A rejoinder to Jean-Francois Lyotard.” In L. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism: 107–130. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavnani, Kum-kum 1993 “Tracing the contours: Feminist research and feminist objectivity.” Women's Studies International Forum 16:95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birke, Lynda and Gail Vine 1987 “Beyond nature vs. nurture.” Women's Studies International Forum 10:555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Monica 1989 “Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developments and new agendas.” International Migration Review 23:638–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Lenie and Marijke Priester 1983 “Living in between: Turkish women in their homeland and in the Netherlands.” In A. Phizaclea (ed.), One Way Ticket: Migration and Female Labour: 113–129. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner, Carole 1986 “The politics of reproduction in a Mexican village.” Signs 11:710–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Mead 1991 “Widows, sons and old-age security in rural Maharashtra.” Population Studies 45:519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Mead, Syeda Khanam, and Shamsun Nahar 1979 “Class, patriarchy, and women's work in Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review 5:405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, John 1979 “Education as a factor in mortality decline: An examination of Nigerian data.” Population Studies 33:395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Strengths and limitations of the survey approach for measuring and understanding fertility change: Alternative possibilities.” In J. Cleland and J. Hobcraft (eds.), Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the WFS: 45–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review 12:171–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 “The global fertility transition: The need for a unifying theory.” Population and Development Review 23:803–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, John, P. H. Reddy, and Pat Caldwell 1982 “The causes of demographic change in rural South India: A micro approach.” Population and Development Review 8:689–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Lincoln 1981 “Sex bias in the family allocation of food and health care in rural Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review 7:55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, John and C. Wilson 1987 “Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view.” Population Studies 41:5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Susan 1979 Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Effects of education and urbanization on fertility.” In R. Bulatao and R. Lee (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, vol. 2:587–626. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill 1986 “Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of black feminist thought.” Social Problems 33:14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. 1985 “Theorizing gender.” Sociology 19:260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1987 Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Judith and Mary Fonow 1990 “Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist social science research.” In J. Nielsen (ed.), Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences: 69–93. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delphy, Christine 1993 “Rethinking sex and gender.” Women's Studies International Forum 16:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeny, Paul 1988 “Social science and population policy.” Population and Development Review 14:451–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, Sonalde and Devaki Jain 1994 “Maternal employment and family dynamics: The social context of women's work in rural South India.” Population and Development Review 20:115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Ruth 1982 “Women in agriculture: Counting the labor force in developing countries.” Population and Development Review 8:539–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, Ruth 1989 “Patriarchy, fertility, and women's work in rural society.” In Proceedings of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, New Delhi, vol. 2:291–303. Liege, Belgium: IUSSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 Population Policy and Women's Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, Cynthia 1989 Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, Barbara and Catherine Coles 1990 “Demographic surveys and Nigerian women.” Signs 15:259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, Shelley 1990 “Recasting sex, gender and power: A theoretical and regional overview.” In J. Atkinson and S. Errington (eds.), Power and Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia: 1–58. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, Marianne and Julie Nelson 1993 Beyond Economic MAN: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Kelly, Maria Patricia 1983 “Mexican border industrialization, female labor force participation and participation and migration.” In J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly (eds.), Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor: 205–223. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx 1990 “Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family history.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52:866–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, Jason and C. Alison McIntosh, eds. 1994 The New Politics of Population: Conflict and Consensus in Family Planning. New York: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Jane 1990 “Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory.” In L. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism: 39–62. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, Nancy 1983 “Of patriarchy born: The political economy of fertility decisions.” Feminist Studies 9:261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonow, Mary and Judith Cook 1991 Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel 1980 The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy and Linda Nicholson 1990 “Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism,” In L. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism: 19–38. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Stephan and Steven Ward 1994a “Deconstruction: Making facts in science, building cases in law.” American Sociological Review 59:481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994b “The sociology and paradoxes of deconstruction: Reply to Agger.” American Sociological Review 59:506–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, Mary 1988 “Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences.” In M. Gergen (ed.), Feminist Thought and the Structure of the Knowledge: 87–104. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Faye 1989 Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Faye and Rayna Rapp 1991 “The politics of reproduction.” Annual Review of Anthropology 20:311–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Faye and Rayna Rapp, eds. 1995 Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Judith 1993 Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Susan 1994 “Controlling births and bodies in village China.” American Ethnologist 21:3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Susan, ed. 1995a Situating Fertility: Anthropological and Demographic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Greenhalgh, Susan 1995b “Engendering reproductive policy and practice in peasant China: For a feminist demography of reproduction,” Signs 20:601–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996 “The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional and political history of 20th century demography,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(1):26–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, Martyn and Paul Atkinson 1983 Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna 1988 “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.” Feminist Studies 14:575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra 1986 The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998 Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Betsy 1987 Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control and Contraceptive Choice. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, Nancy 1983 “The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism.” In S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: 283–310. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, Susan 1997 “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited.” Signs 22:341–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitlinger, Alena 1993 “Fertility and the status of women: An overview.” Paper presented at the IUSSP International Conference, Montreal.

  • Higginbotham, Evelyn Brooks 1992 “African-American women's history and the metalanguage of race.” Signs 17:3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Charles 1994 “Why fertility changes.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Charles and Philip Guest 1990 “Multilevel models of fertility determination in four southeast Asian countries: 1970 and 1980.” Demography 27:369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Dennis 1991 “The ideological origins of the PAA.” Population and Development Review 17:1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierette 1994 Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Pauline 1984 “Women in 19th century Irish immigration.” International Migration Review 18:1004–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggars, Alison and Paula Rothenberg 1993 Feminist Frameworks. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquette, Jane 1982 “Women and modernization theory: A decade of feminist criticism.” World Politics 34:267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, Toby and Abigail Stewart 1991 “Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies” In M. Fonow and J. Cook (eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research: 85–106. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, Shireen 1995 Women's Education, Autonomy, and Reproductive Behaviour: Experience from Developing Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox 1984 Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Just what IS so difficult about the concept of gender as a social category? (response to Richards and Schuster).” Social Studies of Science 19:721–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, David I. and Tom Fricke, eds. 1997 Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. University of Chicago Press.

  • Komter, Aafke 1989 “Hidden power in marriage.” Gender and Society 3:187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, Ron and Johan Surkyn 1988 “Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change.” Population and Development Review 14:1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Robert, Emily Dexter, Patricia Velasco, Sarah Levine, Arun Joshi, Kathleen Stuebing and Medardo Tapia-Uribe 1994 “Maternal literacy and health care in three countries: A preliminary report.” Health Transition Review 4:186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, Linda 1994 Gender Roles: A Sociological Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, Helen 1990 Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith 1994 Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Anju 1991 “Gender and changing generational relations: Spouse choice in Indonesia.” Demography 28:549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Barbara 1994 Engendering Modernity: Feminism, Social Theory, and Social Change. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Karen Oppenheim 1986 “The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies.” Sociological Forum 1:284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “The impact of women's social position on fertility in developing countries.” Sociological Forum 2:718–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Karen Oppenheim and Anju M. Taj 1987 “Differences between women's and men's reproductive goals in developing countries.” Population and Development Review 13:611–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas, Rafael Alarcon, Jorge Durand, and Humberto Gonzalez 1987 Return to Aztlan: The Social Processes of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Susan 1996 “Toward a synthesis of feminist and demographic perspectives on fertility.” Sociological Quarterly 37:83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, Geoffrey 1992 “The agenda of population studies: A commentary and complaint.” Population and Development Review 18:399–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Maria 1991 “Women's research or feminist research? The debate surrounding feminist science and methodology.” In M. Fonow and J. Cook (eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research: 60–84. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade 1991 “Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses.” In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres (eds.), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism: 51–80. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres eds. 1991 Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Joyce 1990 “Introduction.” In J. Nielson (ed.), Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences: 1–37. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, Carla M. 1992 “Islam, women, and politics: The demography of Arab countries.” Population and Development Review 18:33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Mary 1981 The Politics of Reproduction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, Yuko 1998 Office Ladies and Salaried Men: Power, Gender, and Work in Japanese Companies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppong, Christine 1983 “Women's roles, opportunity costs, and fertility.” In R. Bulatao and R. Lee (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, vol. 1:547–589. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, Harriet 1993 “Ain't I am Feminist?” Panel presentation, Annual meetings of the Population Association of America Annual Meetings, Miami. Panel: The Feminist Question in Demography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, Sarah 1990 “Between health and labor market: The recruitment of peasant women in the Andes.” International Migration Review 24:229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit 1992 Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Nancy E. 1992 “Studying gender: What can we learn from the census?” Presented at the International Seminar on China's 1990 Population Census. Beijing, 19–23 October 1992.

  • 1997a “Gender, power, and population change.” Population Bulletin 52(1).

  • 1997b “Similarities and differences: Anthropological and demographic perspectives on gender.” In D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds.), Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis: 115–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Nancy E. and Robert W. Gardner 1993 “Migration decisions: The role of gender.” In Internal Migration of Women in Developing Countries: 195–206. Proceedings of the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on the Ferminization of Migration. Aguascalientes, Mexico. October 1991. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Michelle 1980 “The uses and abuses of anthropology.” Signs 5:389–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathar, Zeba, Nigel Crook, Christine Callum, and Shahnaz Kazi 1988 “Women's status and fertility change in Pakistan.” Population and Development Review 14:415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, Nancy 1993 Death Without Weeping. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 “Demography without numbers,” In D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds.), Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis: 201–222. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, Sidney, Syed Hashemi, and Ann Jenkins 1995 “Bangladesh's family planning success story: A gender perspective.” International Family Planning Perspectives 21(4): 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan Wallach 1988 Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Judith 1991 “Transsexualism: Reflections on the persistence of gender and the mutability of sex.” In J. Epstein and K. Straub (eds.), Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity: 248–279. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Vickie R. and Brenda Dervin 1993 “Sense-making in feminist social science research.” Women's Studies International Forum 16:65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy 1987 The Everyday World as Problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, Elizabeth 1988 Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith and Barrie Thorne 1985 “The missing feminist revolution in sociology.” Social Problems 32:301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichter, Sharon 1990 “Women, employment and the family: Current debates.” In S. Stichter and J. Parpart (eds.), Women, Employment and the Family in the International Division of Labor: 11–72. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, Simon 1993 “The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: A critical intellectual history.” Population and Development Review 19:659–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Nicholas 1997 “An anthropological approach to the concept of fertility: Parenthood, fertility, and social reproduction.” In D. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds.), Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlassof, Carol 1990 “The value of sons in an Indian village: How widows see it.” Population Studies 44:5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992 “Progress and stagnation: Changes in fertility and women's position in an Indian village.” Population Studies 46:195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vock, Jane 1988 “Demographic theories and women's reproductive labor.” In S. Stichter and J. Parpart (eds.), Patriarchy and Class: African Women in the Home and the Workforce: 81–96. Boudler, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Lise 1993 Mothers on the Job: Maternity Policy in the U.S. Workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Martha 1986 Poor Women, Powerful Men: America's Great Experiment in Family Planning. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Susan 1993 “If all we knew about women were what we read in Demography, what would we know?” Demography 30:551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, Chris 1987 Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Sarah 1992 Arguing with the Crocodile. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Diane (ed.) 1996 Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Margery 1972 Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Naomi 1991 The Beauty Myth. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisako, Sylvia and Jane Collier 1987 “Toward a unified analysis of gender and kinship.” In J. Collier and S. Yanagisako (eds.), Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis: 14–50. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riley, N.E. Challenging Demography: Contributions from Feminist Theory. Sociological Forum 14, 369–397 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021443401795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021443401795

Navigation