Skip to main content
Log in

Arthropod diversity in alley cropped black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) stands in eastern Missouri, USA

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge of the complex interactions among trees, crops and their associated fauna is necessary to determine the viability of a particular agroforestry practice. Information is lacking concerning these interactions, particularly in temperate agroforestry practices. We examined the effects of two forages on the growth, nut production, and arthropod communities of alley cropped eastern black walnut, Juglans nigra L. Experimental plots of eastern black walnut, intercropped with alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., smooth bromegrass, Bromis inermis Leyss., or no vegetation were sampled with sweep nets prior to each cutting date for the forages. Comparisons were made between treatments and sampling dates. Tree growth measurements, nut yield and other nut quality measurements were taken at the end of each growing season. There were no differences in tree growth among alleyway treatments. The first season's nut yield was greater from trees with vegetation-free alleyways; otherwise nut production did not differ among the treatments. Arthropods were more numerous and diverse in alley cropped alfalfa than in alley cropped bromegrass or in the vegetation-free controls. Alley cropped bromegrass supported a more diverse population of arthropods than did the vegetation-free control. Arthropod diversity in the tree canopies did not differ among treatments. Alley cropped forages supported a more diverse and even arthropod fauna than did adjacent monocropped forages. We conclude that alley cropped forages had a relatively minor impact on the growth and nut yield of walnut trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andow D.A. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population respose. Annu Rev Entomol 36: 561-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliddawa C.W. 1985. Plant species diversity and crop pest control. Insect Sci Applic 6(4): 479-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin T.J., Hoover W.L., Seifert J.R. and Gillespie A.R. 2000. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA: 4. The economic return of ecological knowledge. Agrofor Syst 48: 79-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset Y. and Burckhardt D. 1992. Abundance, species richness, host utilization and host specificity of insect folivores from a woodland site, with particular reference to host architecture. Revue suisse Zool 99: 771-791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloszyk E., Nawrot J., Harmatha J., Drozdz B. and Chmielewicz Z. 1990. Effectiveness of antifeedants of plant origin in protection of packaging materials against storage insects. J Appl Entomol 110: 96-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk D.T. 1979. Black walnuts for nuts and timber. In: Jaynes R.A. (ed.), Nut Tree Culture in North America. Northern Nut Growers Association, Inc, Hamden CT, pp. 51-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E. and Buck L.E. 1997. Agroforestry practice and policy in the United States of America. For Ecol Manage 91: 5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett H.E. and Jones J.E. 1993. Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) agroforestry as a land-use alternative. North Nut Growers Assoc Ann Rep 84: 47-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A.R., Jose S., Mengel D.B., Hoover W.L., Pope P.E., Seifert J.R. et al. 2000. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 1. Production physiology. Agrofor Syst 48: 25-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J.E., Garrett H.E., Haines J. and Loewenstein E.F. 1995. Genetic selection and fertilization provide increased nut production under walnut-agroforestry management. Agrofor Syst 29: 265-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S., Gillespie A.R., Seifert J.R. and Biehle D.J. 2000a. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 2. Competition for water. Agrofor Syst 48: 41-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S., Gillespie A.R., Seifert J.R., Mengel D.B. and Pope P.E. 2000b. Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics. Agrofor Syst 48: 60-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearby W.H. 1975. insects that affect the growth and form of black walnut in a multicrop system. North Nut Grower Assoc Annu Rep 66: 119-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J.H. 1978. Host-plant influences on insect diversity: the effects of space and time. In: Mound L.A. and Waloff N. (eds), Diversity of insect faunas. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 105-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J.H. and Schroder D. 1977. Effects of plant type, size of geographical range and taxonomic isolation on number of insect species associated with British plants. Nature 265: 137-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. systems. For Ecol Manage 45: 5-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D. and Wheeler A.G. 1972. Species and diversity of arthropods in the alfalfa community. Environ Entomol 2(4): 659-668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule L.C., Colletti J.P., Liu T.P., Jungst S.E., Mize C.W. and Schultz R.C. 1994. Agroforestry and forestry-related practices in the Midwestern United States. Agrofor Syst 27: 79-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps W.T. and Linit M.J. 1998. Plant diversity and arthropod communities: Implications for temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 39: 73-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1992. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 6th edn. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 705 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M.W., Arnold D.C., Eikenbary R.D., Rice N.R., Shiferaw A., Cheary B.S. et al. 1996a. Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Bio Control 6: 164-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M.W., Arnold D.C., Eikenbary R.D., Rice N.R., Shiferaw A., Cheary B.S. et al. 1996b. Influence of ground cover on phytophagous and saprophagous arthropods in pecan trees. South-west Entomol 21: 303-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong D.R. and Levin D.A. 1979. Species richness of plant parasites and growth form of their hosts. Amer Nat 14:1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sambeek J.W. 1985. Intercropping black walnu. North Nut Grow Annu Rep 76: 157-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.A. and Gordon A.M. 1992. The potential of intercropping as an alternative land use system in temperate North America. Agrofor Syst 19: 253-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.A. and Gordon A.M. 1995. Microclimate and soil moisture effects of three intercrops on the rows of a newly-newly planted intercropped plantation. Agrofor Syst 29: 285-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss E. 1996. The effects of artificial weed strips on diversity and abundance of arthropod fauna in a Swiss experimental apple orchard. Agric Ecosys Environ 60: 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Terrell Stamps.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stamps, W.T., Woods, T.W., Linit, M.J. et al. Arthropod diversity in alley cropped black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) stands in eastern Missouri, USA. Agroforestry Systems 56, 167–175 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021319628004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021319628004

Navigation