Abstract
Recent research in scientific laboratories shows that inscriptions – graphs, diagrams, photographs, tables, mathematical formulae, and so forth – are central to scientific practice. Research also shows that inscriptions are pervasive elements in science textbooks. This study examines inscriptions in texts usually available to students in high school and undergraduate science courses: course textbooks and journal articles. Four complementary analyses of the content of these resources are presented: (i) an enumeration of the types of inscriptions in those resources; (ii) a semiotic analyses of the content of representative inscriptions; (iii) an interpretation by graduates of a science program of an inscription common to all three resources; and (iv) a comparison of an inscription found in textbooks and lectures with its original presentation in a scientific journal. Differences exist in frequency of different types of inscriptions; these frequencies appear unrelated to interpretive competencies of the students for whom they are intended. We suggest alterations made in inscriptions as they are moved from professional journals to textbooks contributed to confounding their interpretation. Implications for both science education and the use of inscriptions in textbooks are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Andrews, W. A., Andrews, B. J., Balconi, D. A., & Purcell, N. J. (1983). Discovering biological science. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Bastide, F. (1990). The iconography of scientific texts: Principles of analysis. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 187-229). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Begon, M., Harper, J. L., & Townsend, C. R. (1996). Ecology: Individuals, populations, and communities (3rd ed.). Cambridge,MA: Blackwell Science.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Studies. (1985). Biological sciences: A molecular approach (5th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Studies. (1987). Biological sciences: An ecological approach (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (1998). Lecturing graphing: What features of lectures contribute to student difficulties in learning to interpret graphs? Research in Science Education, 28, 77-90.
Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (in review). Graph interpretation practices of science and education majors. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education.
Bowen, G. M., Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Interpretations of graphs by university biology students and practising scientists: Towards a social practice view of scientific representation practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1020-1043.
Cobb, P., & Tzou, C. (in press). Supporting students' learning about data creation. Cognition & Instruction.
Craeger, J. G., Jantzen, P. G., & Mariner, J. L. (1985). Biology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Eickmeier, W. G. (1978). Photosynthetic pathway distributions along an aridity gradient in Big Bend National Park, and implications for enhanced resource partitioning. Photosynthetica, 12, 290-297.
Good, R. (1993). Editorial: Science textbook analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 619.
Greeno, J. G. (1988). Situated activities of learning and knowing in mathematics. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne, & M. M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the PME-NA (pp. 481-521). DeKalb, IL: IGPME.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Amann, K. (1990). Image dissection in natural scientific inquiry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 259-283.
Krebs, C. J. (1994). Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance (4th ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open Univ. Press.
Latour, B. (1993). La clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences [The key to Berlin and other lessons of a science lover]. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
Lynch, M. (1990). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 153-186). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement-ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77-108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Mader, S. S. (1985). Inquiry into life (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Commentary: Comprehension of graphics in texts: An overview. Learning and Instruction, 3, 239-245.
Moody, D. E. (1996). Evolution and the textbook structure of biology. Science Education, 80, 395-418.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Oram, R. F. (1983). Biology: Living systems (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merril.
Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227-238.
Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W.-M. (2002, April). Towards a pedagogy of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Ricklefs, R. E. (1993). The economy of nature: A textbook in basic ecology (4th ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
Roth, W.-M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problems?: Mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 487-527.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1993). An investigation of problem framing and solving in a grade 8 open-inquiry science program. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 165-204.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1994). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open-inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 293-318.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73-128.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999a). Digitising lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29, 627-654.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Complexities of graphical representations during lectures: A phenomenological approach. Learning and Instruction, 9, 235-255.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001a). 'Creative solutions' and 'fibbing results': Enculturation in field ecology. Social Studies of Science, 31, 533-556.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001b). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159-194.
Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 977-1019.
Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: A social practice approach to “representations.” Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
Schnotz, W. (1993). Introduction. Learning and Instruction, 3, 151-155.
Smith, R. L., & Smith, T. M. (1998). Elements of ecology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. (1993). Artificial intelligence as craftwork. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 144-178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 123-152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowen, G.M., Roth, WM. Why Students May not Learn to Interpret Scientific Inscriptions. Research in Science Education 32, 303–327 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020833231966
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020833231966