Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clitic Placement after Syntax: Evidence from Wolof Person and Locative Markers

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an empirical contributionto the typology of functional nominals(pronouns), and to the theory of clitics. Its primary goal is to present an adequate descriptive analysis of the attached person and locative markers of Wolof, a language whose ‘special clitics’ partly pattern like those of Berber, described by Dell and Elmedlaoui (1989), Ouhalla (1989), and Boukhris (1998). Our study leads us to discard an all-syntactic account of the special position of clitics, of the sort developed by Ouhalla and Boukhris for Berber, and by Njie (1982) and Dunigan (1994) for Wolof, and to adopt an approach crucially separating the syntactic and morphophonological properties of clitics, along the lines set by various scholars working on the syntax-phonology interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, Steven. 1992. A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Steven. 1993. ‘Wackernagel's Revenge: Clitics, Morphology, and the Syntax of Second Position’, Language 69(1), 68–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit (ed.). 1986. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Syntax and Semantics 19, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2000. ‘Cliticization and the Syntax-Phonology Interface’, unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.

  • Bouchard, Denis. 1982. On the Content of Empty Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT [published 1984 by Foris, Dordrecht].

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukhris, Fatima. 1998. Les clitiques en berbère tamazighte: approche minimaliste, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Université Mohamed V, Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaletti, Anna and Michael Starke. 1999. ‘The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns’, in H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 145–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, Eric. 1981. Le système verbal du wolof, Documents Linguistiques 27, Publications of the Department of General and African Linguistics, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris. 1997. Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, François and Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 1989. ‘Clitic Ordering, Morphology and Phonology in the Verbal Complex of Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber’, Langues orientales anciennes. Philologie et Linguistique 2–3, Peeters, Leuven/Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, Amadou. 1981a. Une phonologie du wolof, Les langues nationales au Sénégal 78, Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, Amadou. 1981b. Structures verbales du wolof contemporain, Les langues nationales au Sénégal 80, Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diouf, Jean-Léopold. 1982. Introduction à une étude du système verbal du wolof: relation modes, pronoms sujets et autres modalités du prédicat, Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1999. ‘The Typology of Pronouns and the Distinction between Syntax and Morphophonology’, in H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunigan, Melynda. 1994. The Clausal Structure of Wolof: A Study of Focus and Cliticization, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph. 1975. ‘A Transformational Analysis of French Clitics without Positive Output Constraints’, Linguistic Analysis 1(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fal, Aram, Rosine Santos and Jean-Léonce Doneux. 1990. Dictionnaire wolof-français, Karthela, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fal, Aram. 1991. Alphabétisation in wolof: Guide orthographique, Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frota, Sonia. 1992. ‘Is Focus a Phonological Category in Portuguese?’, Proceedings of ConSole, Utrecht University, pp. 69–86.

  • Givón, Talmy. 1972. ‘Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist's Field Trip’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 7, 394–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, Talmy. 1976. ‘Topic, Pronoun, and Grammatical Agreement’, in C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York, pp. 149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. The Languages of Africa, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. ‘Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, Aaron. 1995. On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James. 1997. ‘Why n'ho is pronounced [li] in Barceloní Catalan:Morphological Impoverishment, Merger, Fusion and Fission’, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 26, 61–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James. 1998. ‘Spanish Imperatives: Syntax Meets Morphology’, Journal of Linguistics 34, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, Sharon and Draga Zec (eds.). 1990. The Phonology-Syntax Connection, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ka, Omar. 1978. L'accent en wolof: essai d'analyse phonétique et linguistique, unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Dakar, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ka, Omar. 1994. Wolof Phonology and Morphology, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ka, Ousman. 1982. La syntaxe du wolof: essai d'analyse distributionnelle, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Dakar University, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, Ellen. 1983. ‘The Syntax of Auxiliary Reduction in English’, Language 59, 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, Ellen. 1990. ‘Toward a Typology of Postlexical Rules’, in S. Inkelas and D. Zec (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, pp. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1989. ‘Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1991. ‘Romance Clitics, Verb Movement, and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1999. ‘A Note on Clitic Doubling in French’, unpublished manuscript, New York University.

  • Keenan, Edward. 1996. ‘Morphology Is Structure: A Malagasy Test Case’, in M. Pearson and I. Paul (eds.), The Structure of Malagasy, Vol. 1, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, Department of Linguistics, University of California, LA, pp. 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihm, Alain. 1995. ‘Le capuchon de mon stylo-mon capuchon de stylo: morphosyntaxe et sémantique des compléments du nom en wolof’, in J. Guéron (ed.), Rencontres: études de syntaxe et de morphologie, Publidix, Université Paris-10, Nanterre, pp. 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, Judy. 1980. Some Problems in a Theory of Clitics, Ph.D. dissertation, University College London. Published 1982 by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, Judith. 1985. ‘The Independence of Syntax and Phonology in Cliticization’, Language 61, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Geraldine. 1997. ‘Optimal Romanian Clitics: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective’, Technical Report JHU-CogSci 98–9, Department of Cognitive Science, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip. 1992. Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar, Garland, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip, Geoffrey Pullum, and Arnold Zwicky. 1997. ‘The Principle of Phonologyfree Syntax: Four Apparent Counterexamples in French’, Journal of Linguistics 33, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip and Ivan Sag. 1997. ‘French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 573–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Lea and Alain Rouveret. 1999. ‘Feature Fission and the Syntax of Argument DPs and Clitics’, paper presented at the Clitic Round Table, Département de Recherches Linguistiques, Université Paris-7, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Njie, Codu Mbassy. 1982. Description syntaxique du wolof de Gambie, Les Nouvelles Editions Africaines, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, Jamal. 1989. ‘Clitic Movement and the ECP: Evidence from Berber and Romance Languages’, Lingua 79, 165–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey and Arnold Zwicky. 1988. ‘The Syntax-Phonology IInterface’, in F. Newmeyer (ed.), Cambridge Survey of Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 255–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. ‘The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge, Yves. 1990. The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Stéphane. 1991. Approche énonciative du système verbal. Le cas du wolof, Editions du CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouveret, Alain. 1999. ‘Clitics, Subjects and Tense in European Portuguese’, in H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 639–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauzet, Patrick. 1996. ‘Ordre des mots, ordre dans les mots’, Langue française 111, 10–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauzet, Patrick. 1998. ‘Enamourer, enivrer, enorgueillir: le statut des préfixes’, in P. Sauzet (ed.), Langues & Grammaire II & III: Phonologie, Linguistics Department, Université Paris-8, Saint-Denis, pp. 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauzet, Patrick. 1999. ‘Linéarité et consonnes latentes’, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 28, 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauzet, Patrick. 2000. ‘Clitiques: comment bouger sans changer de place, ou: si la phonologie remplaçait le mouvement?’, paper presented at the Langues & Grammaire weekly seminar, Paris.

  • Sauvageot, Serge. 1965. Description synchronique d'un dialecte wolof: le parler du Dyolof, Institut Français d'Afrique Noire, Dakar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, Ur. 1994. ‘Semitic Clitics’, Geneva Generative Papers 2, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. ‘Clitic Constructions’, in J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN, pp. 213–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. ‘Uber ein Gezets der indogermanischen Wortstellung’, Indogermanische Forschungen 1, 333–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, Karen. 1982. Government and Proper Government of Verbal Projections, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2000. ‘Les pronoms forts du français sont-ils [+animés]? Spécification morphologique et spécification sémantique’, in M. Coene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale and Y. D'Hulst (eds.), Traiani Augusti Vestigia Pressa Sequamur: Studia Linguistica in Honorem Lilianae Tasmowski, Unipress, Padova, pp. 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne and Lamine Diagne. 1999, ‘Description linguistique et grammaire universelle: réflexions sur la notion de finitude à partir de la grammaire du wolof’, in A. Söres and C. Marchello-Nizia (eds.), Typologie des langues, universaux linguistiques, special issue of LINX, Linguistics Department, Université Paris-10, Nanterre, pp. 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne and Liliane Mbolatianavalona. 1999. ‘Towards a Modular Theory of Linguistic Deficiency: Evidence from Malagasy Personal Pronouns’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17, 161–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1977. On Clitics, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1982. ‘Stranded to and Phonological Phrasing in English’, Linguistics 20, 3–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. ‘Clitics and Particles’, Language 61, 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1986. ‘The Unaccented Pronoun Constraint in English’, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 32, 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1990. ‘Syntactic Representations and Phonological Shapes’, in S. Inkelas and D. Zec (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, pp. 379–397.

  • Zwicky, Arnold and Geoffrey Pullum. 1983. ‘Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't’, Language 59, 502–513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UPRESA 7023, CNRS/Paris-8 Département de Linguistique, Générale UniversitéParis-8, 2 rue de la Liberté, F-93526, Saint-Denis Cedex 02, France

    Anne Zribi-Hertz & Lamine Diagne

Authors
  1. Anne Zribi-Hertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lamine Diagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zribi-Hertz, A., Diagne, L. Clitic Placement after Syntax: Evidence from Wolof Person and Locative Markers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 823–884 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020494714861

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020494714861

Keywords

Search

Navigation