Skip to main content
Log in

Topsoil Magnetic Susceptibility Mapping: Data Reproducibility and Compatibility, Measurement Strategy

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic susceptibility measurements on topsoils have often been used during the last few years to detect anthropogenic pollution. In most cases, a Bartington susceptibility meter for field measurements was used. However, up to now, no standard procedure has been developed for carrying out such investigations. The purpose of our study was to test the compatibility of different set-ups of instruments used for this purpose and the possible influences of subjective (human) factors. Field magnetic susceptibility measurements, carried out with four different Bartington MS2D instruments in strictly defined positions, are very consistent both for low and high values. The correlation coefficient between the magnetic susceptibility values recorded with different Bartington MS2D probes reached 97–98%. A test area was mapped independently by two groups, without any restrictions concerning the choice and distribution of the measured points, but respecting a few standard conditions (e.g., measuring at a distance from tree trunks; on the flattest place possible; recording between 10–30 values per point). The resulting susceptibility maps show the same general features in both cases, suggesting that the measuring strategy applied is suitable for topsoil magnetic screening. The methodology proposed can be used to map magnetic susceptibility on a larger scale—for example Europe—providing large sets of representative data and eliminating border-transition biases and human errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cressie N.A.C., 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 900 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J.A., Maher B.A. and Oldfield F., 1985. Geomorphologic linkages between soils and sediments: the role of magnetic measurements. In: K.S. Richards, R.R. Arnett, S. Ellis (Eds.), Geomorphology and Soils. Allen and Unwin, London, 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J.A, Hay K.L., Baban S.M.J., Huddleston A.S., Wellington E.M.H. and Loveland P.J., 1996. Magnetic susceptibility of soil: an evaluation of conflicting theories using a national data set. Geophys. J. Int., 127, 728–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J., 1999. Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility. Using the Bartington MS2 System (Second Edition). Chi Publishing, England, 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers M.J. and Pietersen H.S., 1992. Magnetic properties of low-Ca fly ash: a rapid tool for Fe-assessment and survey for potentially hazardous elements. In: F.P. Glasser, G.J. McCarthy, J.F. Young, T.O. Masson and P.L. Pratt (Eds.), Advanced Cementitious Systems: Mechanisms and Properties. Materials Research Society Symp. Proceedings, Pittsburgh, 245, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine P., Singer M.J., La Ven R., Verosub K. and Southard R.J., 1989. Role of pedogenesis in distribution of magnetic susceptibility in two California chronosequences. Geoderma, 44, 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders P.J., 1994. Collection, measurements and analysis of airborne magnetic particulates from pollution in the environment. J. Appl. Phys., 75, 5931–5936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgeaud V.M., Rochette P., Ambrosi J.P., Vandamme D. and Williamson D., 1997. Relationship between heavy metals and magnetic properties in a large polluted catchment: the Étang de Berre (south of France). Phys. Chem. Earth, 22, 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay K.L., Dearing J.A., Baban S.M.J. and Loveland P.J., 1997. A preliminary attempt to identify atmospherically-derived pollution particles in English topsoils from magnetic susceptibility measurements. Phys. Chem. Earth, 22, 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller F., Strzyszcz Z. and Magiera T., 1998. Magnetic record of industrial pollution in forest soils of Upper Silesia, Poland. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (B8), 17767–17774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann V., Knab M. and Appel E., 1999. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of roadside pollution. J. Geochem. Explor., 66, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A., Jones J. and Oldfield F., 1984. Magnetic measurements and heavy metals in atmospheric particulates of anthropogenic origin. Sci. Total Environ., 33, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks E.H. and Srinivastava R.M., 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapička A., Petrovský E. and Jordanova N., 1997. Comparison of in situ field measurements of soil magnetic susceptibility with laboratory data. Stud. geophys. geod., 41, 391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapička A., Petrovský E., Jordanova N. and Podrázský V., 2001. Magnetic parameters of forest top soils in Krkonoše Mountains, Czech Republic. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (A), 26, 917–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoanet H., Leveque F. and Seguna S., 1999. Magnetic susceptibility in environmental applications: comparison of field probes. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins C.E., 1977. Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science — a review. J. Soil Sci., 28, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovský E., Kapička A., Jordanova N., Knab M. and Hoffmann V., 2000. Low-field magnetic susceptibility: a proxy method of estimating increased pollution of different environmental ecosystems. Environ. Geol., 39, 312–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholger R., 1996. Magnetic susceptibility and heavy metal contamination of sediments in the river Mur (Styria, Austria). Geol. Carpath, 47, 191–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholger R., 1998. Heavy metal pollution monitoring by magnetic measurements applied to sediments of the river Mur (Styria, Austria). European Journal of Environment and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzyszcz Z., 1991. Ferromagnetism of soil in some Polish National Parks. Mitt. Stsch. Bodenk. Ges., 66, 1119–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzyszcz Z., 1993. Magnetic susceptibility of soils in the areas influenced by industrial imissions. In: Soil Monitoring. Monte Verita, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 225–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzyszcz Z., Magiera T. and Heller F., 1996. The influence of industrial imissions on the magnetic susceptibility of soils in Upper Silesia. Stud. geoph. geod., 40, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R. and Oldfield F., 1986. Environmental Magnetism. Allen and Unwin, London, 227 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vassilev S.V., 1992. Phase mineralogy studies of solid waste products from coal burning at some Bulgarian thermoelectric power plants. Fuel, 71, 625–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schibler, L., Boyko, T., Ferdyn, M. et al. Topsoil Magnetic Susceptibility Mapping: Data Reproducibility and Compatibility, Measurement Strategy. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 46, 43–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019885532390

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019885532390

Navigation