Abstract
Senescence can influence: (1) leaf area duration, (2) area of transpiringtissue and (3) translocation of nutrients – mainly nitrogen to grain.Therefore, selection for optimum senescence pattern might be efficient forimproving performance of wheat in a given environment. This study wasconducted to investigate the feasibility of a seedling test for estimatinggenotypic differences in senescence rate of wheat. We studied the responseof several wheat genotypes to dark exposure of seedlings, by measuring therate of chlorophyll loss in the first leaf. The rate of chlorophyll loss variedsignificantly among genotypes, the highest rate being more than double ofthe lowest. Linear regression accounted for most of the chlorophyll contentvariation during dark treatment in all cultivars. Significant correlation wasfound between the rate of chlorophyll loss following exposure to darknessand chlorophyll loss during aging in an environment relatively free ofdiseases and stresses. A good correlation was also found between theresponse of several genotypes to dark exposure and chlorophyll loss ofseedlings following starvation. We conclude that a seedling test for darkinduced senescence might allow an easy characterization of senescencepattern, allowing increased genetic progress in its optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banowetz, G.M., 1997. Cultivars of hexaploid wheat of contrasting stature and chlorophyll retentiondiffer in cytokinin content and responsiveness. Ann Bot 79: 185–190.
Boyd, W.J.R. & M.G. Walker,1972. Variation in chlorophyll a content and stability in wheat flag leaves. Ann Bot 36: 87–92.
Buchanan-Wollaston, V., 1997. The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 48(307): 181–199.
Crafts-Brandner, S.J., F.E. Below, V.A. Wittenbach & J.E. Hageman, 1984. Differential senescence of maize hybrids following ear removal. II. Selected leaf. Plant Physiol 74: 368–373.
Duncan, R.R., A.J. Bockholt & F.R. Miller, 1981. Descriptive comparison of senescent and non-senescent sorghum genotypes. Agronomy Journal 73: 849–853.
Fokar, M., A. Blum & H.T. Nguyen, 1998. Heat tolerance in spring wheat. II. Grain filling.Euphytica 104: 9–15.
Noodén, L.D. & A.C. Leopold, 1988. Senescence and aging in plants. AcademicPress Inc. 526 pp.
Oh, S.A., S.Y. Lee, I.K. Chung, C.-H. Lee & H.G. Nam, 1996. A senescence-associated gene ofArabidopsis thaliana is distinctively regulated during natural and artificially induced leaf senescence. Plant Mol. Biol. 30: 739–754.
Pierce, R.O., P.F. Knowles, D.A. Phillips, 1984. Inheritance of delayed leaf senescence in soybean.Crop Sci. 24: 515–517.
Sears, R., 1998. Strategies for improving wheat grain yield. In: Braun, H. J. etal. (Eds.), Wheat: Prospects for Global Improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 17–21.
Thomas, H.,C.M. Smart, 1993. Crops that stay green. Ann Appl Biol 123: 193–219.
Thomas, H.,J.L. Stoddart, 1975. Separation of chlorophyll degradation from other senescence processes in leaves of a mutant genotype of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Plant Physiol, 56: 438–441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saulescu, N., Ittu, G. & Mustatea, P. Dark induced senescence as a tool in breeding wheat for optimum senescence pattern. Euphytica 119, 205–209 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017521218657
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017521218657